User talk:Mint Keyphase

Hi there, Mint Keyphase! Welcome to wikipedia! I noticed your contributions and wanted to greet you with pleasure to the free encyclopedia. Please sign your name on talk pages with 4 tildes (~ 4x). Alright, get out there, and have fun editing!!😀😀😀🤠☻ MrActiniuM (talk) 10:30, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mint Keyphase. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2–3 days of inactivity. Message added by ClaudineChionh (she/her · talk · contribs · email) 03:20, 16 July 2024 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template.[reply]

Hi Mint Keyphase. Welcome to Wikipedia. I hope you don't mind if I share some of my thoughts on starting out as a new editor on Wikipedia: If I could get editors in your situation to follow just one piece of advice, it would be this: Learn Wikipedia by working only on non-contentious topics until you have a feel for the normal editing process and the policies that usually come up when editing casually. You'll find editing to be fun, easy, and rewarding. The rare disputes are resolved quickly and easily in collaboration.

Working on biographical information about living persons is far more difficult. Wikipedia's Biographies of living persons policy requires strict adherence to multiple content policies, and applies to all information about living persons including talk pages.

If you have a relationship with the topics you want to edit, then you will need to review Wikipedia's Conflict of interest policy, which may require you to disclose your relationship and restrict your editing depending upon how you are affiliated with the subject matter. Regardless, editing in a manner that promotes an entity or viewpoint over others can appear to be detrimental to the purpose of Wikipedia and the neutrality required in articles.

Some topic areas within Wikipedia have special editing restrictions that apply to all editors. It's best to avoid these topics until you are extremely familiar with all relevant policies and guidelines.

If you work from reliable, independent sources, you shouldn't go far wrong. WP:RSP and WP:RSN are helpful in determining if a source is reliable.

If you find yourself in a disagreement with another editor, it's best to discuss the matter on the relevant talk page.

I hope you find some useful information in all this, and welcome again. --Hipal (talk) 20:29, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Whelp, what did I mess up? —Mint Keyphase (Did I mess up? What have I done?) 06:45, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing, Hipal is just saying hi! Polygnotus (talk) 12:05, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Phew, I thought I accidentally committed some unpardonable sins of wikipedia, lol. —Mint Keyphase (Did I mess up? What have I done?) 02:16, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Wildlife Drones, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mapping software. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 07:55, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. Just so you know, the personnel section at The Monkees was laid out and sourced properly, as per MOS:ALBUM, specifically WP:PERSONNEL. It states, In some instances, an album will have a wide variety of performers from track to track. In these cases, it is helpful to list which tracks feature which performers. This can be done in one of two ways: by listing the track's name and then giving a list of performers, or by providing a single list of performers which notes parenthetically which tracks feature this artist. Thanks.—The Keymaster (talk) 07:30, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

However, is it necessary to separate lead vocal, harmony vocal, backing vocal, and vocal vocal? I think just grouping it under "vocals" would work. —Mint Keyphase (Did I mess up? What have I done?) 07:36, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I laid it out exactly as it was in the liner notes. I'm a very active editor in WT:ALBUMS and have edited hundreds of pages in a similar manner. You may have a point about the redundancy of the different vocal credits, but this is exactly the way they were listed by the band's historian Andrew Sandoval in the most current edition of the album, for some reason (which is cited there with a ref). If you want, you can always start a discussion about this at the WT:ALBUMS page and try to solicit more editors' opinions on it. I'm going to go ahead and restore the edit for now. Cheers. The Keymaster (talk) 07:47, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'll just self-revert for you. —Mint Keyphase (Did I mess up? What have I done?) 07:48, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

nvm. you've done so already. —Mint Keyphase (Did I mess up? What have I done?) 07:50, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Balsam Cottonwood. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to User talk:Blocked user have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Balsam Cottonwood (talk) 04:54, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

In User talk:Example

This is an example of a user talk page. See Help:Talk pages for help on using user talk pages. To mess around and test things, try User talk:Sandbox or User talk:Blocked user.

So I had the impression that i was allowed to do a test there. —Mint Keyphase (Did I mess up? What have I done?) 05:49, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oh. Sorry. I'm new here too (I created this account on Jan. 26, 2025), and I thought I was looking at disruptive editing. Next time I'll try to be more mindful. Keep editing!

Sorry! Balsam Cottonwood (talk) 18:04, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Don't worry, we are all human, mistake happen every now and then. —Mint Keyphase (Did I mess up? What have I done?) 01:01, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thanks. Balsam Cottonwood (talk) 01:23, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This is a very bad idea. Don't. Polygnotus (talk) 10:23, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

And so is using images of real accidents in which people were injured or killed in Wikipedia:April Fools/April Fools' Day 2025/The Falls at Wikipedia Commons. Meters (talk) 20:45, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

2008_Chatsworth_train_collision#Casualties. Polygnotus (talk) 20:53, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oops, sorry, didn't realize that —Mint Keyphase (Did I mess up? What have I done?) 09:16, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

belated  Self-trout —Mint Keyphase (Did I mess up? What have I done?) 07:12, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Mint Keyphase! The thread you created at the Teahouse, "User does not exist", has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread. See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:24, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mint Keyphase. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2–3 days of inactivity. Message added by Tarlby ^{(t) (c)} 04:01, 22 April 2025 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template.[reply]

Hello Mint Keyphase! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Was my course of action correct?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread. See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:42, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I don't believe for Hindley Street Country Club, the achievement of 3 quarters of a billion views is "in excessive detail". This is the reason they are famous. One of the two founders leaving the band is also significant. Please cease removing cited material. V260z (talk) 04:26, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No, we do not simply remove the name of an individual from the history of a group just because they have left. As for the 3 quarter billion views claim, I will restore it after I check the source. —Mint Keyphase (Did I mess up? What have I done?) 01:57, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No, youtube videos are not reliable sources. —Mint Keyphase (Did I mess up? What have I done?) 02:04, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Social blade was the resource, not Youtube... https://socialblade.com/youtube/channel/UCPbEcJyVcETaWrubYOg4UTw

Current count is at 777,289,165

You also have misunderstood. I was not removing a founding member's name, I had added the date when he left the band.

It appears AlphaLemur has since fixed your edits anyway.

So, no need to debate this anymore. V260z (talk) 14:09, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Mint Keyphase! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Some idle questions about sourcing, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread. See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:10, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]