User talk:ZeroOne

Old discussions

• /Archive 1
• /Archive 2

Speedy deletion has to be based on one of the specific guidelines that have been established. If you just make up a reason, as on Pakistan Vs Australia UAE 2009, your request will be declined. Also, if you do mark an article for deletion, it is very strongly recommended that you notify the author (you can use the template message that appears in the speedy deletion box itself). --R'n'B (call me Russ) 15:19, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Chess_position has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. SunCreator (talk) 00:28, 6 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello ZeroOne! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 0 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

1. Harry Harkimo - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 00:02, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for User:ZeroOne/Userboxes/Bureaucracy :) I used this box for my user page!--Tim32 (talk) 05:22, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Happy to help. :) —ZeroOne (talk / @) 14:36, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello ZeroOne. You have been invited to join WikiProject Java, a WikiProject dedicated to improving the Java-related articles on Wikipedia. You received this invitation due to your interest in, or edits relating to or within the scope of the project or the Java Portal. If you would like to join or just help out a bit, please visit the project page, and add your name to the list of project members. You may also wish to add to your userpage: {{Wikipedia:WikiProject Java/Userbox}} and to the top of your talk page: == WikiProject Java (announcements) == {{Wikipedia:WikiProject_Java/Announcements}} Know someone who might be interested? Please pass the message to others by pasting the code in their talk page: == WikiProject Java and Portal == {{subst: Template:WikiProject_Java/Welcome|~~~~}} Thanks, AlainR345Techno-Wiki-Geek 05:52, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the invitation! I had actually already added my name to the list of project members but I now added the userbox to my user page too. —ZeroOne (talk / @) 14:36, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi ZeroOne, and thanks for your recent involvement with this dear project of ours. If you take a look at the to-do page, you'll see there's plenty to do for everyone... May I suggest the New Java-categorized articles task. If that suits you, please put your user name on the relevant line in the to-do page so that everybody knows where you're contributing. Thanks again and don't hesitate to ask for any clarification or if you would like something else to do instead, --AlainR345^{Techno-Wiki-Geek} 22:31, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I actually got somewhat interested in the WikiBook Java Programming. I already found a couple of issues and raised questions about them. —ZeroOne (talk / @) 20:00, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Awesome idea! As you may know, that book is linked at the bottom of Portal:Java and therefore it's an important task. Actually there is a line for that on the to-do page and I took the liberty of putting your name there... Only problem I can see is that as you know there seems to be a User:Arunreginald quite active on that. Try to coordinate. You may get more ideas here and here. Know what they say on Wikipedia: BE BOLD! --AlainR345^{Techno-Wiki-Geek} 21:50, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Giftiger wunsch has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching!

Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!

Just a random cookie since I saw you transcluded the improved xkcd userbox into my user page for me :p
Warning: may contain traces of nuts. GiftigerWunsch [TALK] 19:16, 21 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that you have revised either Sid Meier's Alpha Centauri or Sid Meier's Alien Crossfire.

I intend to revise those articles following the Wikipedia:WikiProject Video games/Article guidelines. There are more details on the discussion pages of those articles. I'd be interested in any comments you have. It would be best if your comments were on the discussion pages of the two articles.

Thank you.

Vyeh (talk) 10:56, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 18:28, 17 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nice, thanks, I guess. :) —ZeroOne (talk / @) 15:23, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I removed the review because Civ V's been well covered by noted review sites, and I feel their reviews should be added first - like if there's a lack of reviews for a game, then it's ok to include some lesser-known review sites, but generally I think the sites with existing templates should be used first, and primarily. Thanks! Fin©™ 20:19, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, didn't answer your question. "nn review" means non-notable, but I don't mean this in the wikipedia way. Feel free to add back the gameshark review if you think it's important etc! Thanks! Fin©™ 20:20, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Gorillas screenshot.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:07, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wrote something. Thanks for letting me know! —ZeroOne (talk / @) 15:14, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Scoring shown in this picture, for guess one and three are wrong and possibly for guess number four (I can't tell if the color of the two left pegs is pink or red, if it is red then this is wrong too) Maybe this image should be removed from the Mastermind (board game) article because I think it is confusing. What is your opinion? Sgv 6618 (talk) 22:51, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, and thanks for your concern. The guesses seem to be as follows:

1. yellow, yellow, blue, blue
2. purple, red, red, yellow
3. green, purple, green, yellow
4. pink, pink, purple, yellow
5. blue, red, green, purple
6. green, blue, red, purple

I can't see any errors in the guesses you mentioned, would you mind elaborating?

—ZeroOne (talk / @) 11:21, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

To be honest nothing is wrong with the scoring. The only thing that is wrong is my laptop's screen color fidelity. Exams' fatigue + Laptop screen = wrong assumption, Rest + Desktop screen = clear view! Sorry for that! Sgv 6618 (talk) 01:07, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Haha, well, no problem. :) —ZeroOne (talk / @) 12:45, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello ZeroOne!

I'm a filmmaker who recently featured a super low budget film - The Electroscheme. I would love to use your photo Assembly2004-areena01 in our trailer. I can send you the trailer for approval.

Since movie trailers don't have credits, we will give you a credit in the ending film credits. Is this alright? The movie is an experimental comedy, kind of like Monty Python. We will use the photo for about 3 seconds in the trailer to represent the "Digital Age."

Please email me at golden.thrills@gmail.com with any questions.

Thank you! Alex —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.185.109.207 (talk) 03:46, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Alex! Sure, go ahead and use the photo. The project sounds cool, I'd be honored. :) —ZeroOne (talk / @) 13:10, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I added a new section to the discussion for this article.

Talk:LZ77_and_LZ78#This_article_needs_some_corrections

Rcgldr (talk) 21:10, 13 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Knightmare Chess 2.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 08:24, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done. —ZeroOne (talk / @) 10:41, 1 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

Do you happen to have a version of http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Coilgun_animation.gif with a smoother animation?

Thanks in advance, Joemalt1832 (talk) 20:28, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello member of Category:Wikipedians who use IRC! You are invited to join an ongoing discussion on Wikipedia talk:IRC/wikipedia-en-help aimed at defining a policy for prerequisites to being a helper in the "#wikipedia-en-help ^connect" channel in a section titled "New helper policy".

To prevent future mailings about IRC, you may remove your user page from Category:Wikipedians who use IRC.
Assistance is available upon request if you can't figure out where it is being added to your user page.
This message has been sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:00, 27 April 2015 (UTC) on behalf of — {{U|Technical 13}} (e • t • c)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:48, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Molez is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Molez until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. czar 06:12, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ZeroOne. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ZeroOne. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hey! So I noticed that your IrfanView box is really old and doesn't use the logo (which it should, it doesn't have copyright restrictions), so I decided to be bold and remake it. If you don't like it, feel free to revert it back! Thanks!

--ShiningWingCutie (talk) 02:01, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your version does look better, thanks! :) —ZeroOne (talk / @) 19:53, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ZeroOne. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I misread your "wikipedia over dns" with Germanic use of over. It was interesting to me because I wanna cite DNS records as a primary source for contributing material on wikipedia. Now I see your meaning. Thank you and happy 25th of May! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 126.161.188.201 (talk) 13:23, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ZeroOne. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, ZeroOne. You are cordially invited to join the Life on Mars WikiProjects! We're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to Life on Mars (TV series) and its spin off Ashes to Ashes (TV series). We've noticed that you have an interest in the field, and may be interested in joining Wikipedia's dedicated collaborative effort.

We look forward to working with you in the project!

Saxonvsjones (talk) 23:46, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of races and species in The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of races and species in The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TTN (talk) 16:02, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello ZeroOne! This message is to inform you that due to editing inactivity, your access to AutoWikiBrowser may be temporarily removed. If you do not resume editing within the next week, your username will be removed from the CheckPage. This is purely for routine maintenance and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You may regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! — MusikBot II ^talk 17:24, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 178 (number) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/178 (number) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

interstatefive  (talk) - just another roadgeek 18:06, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect The Pianist (memoir and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 27#The Pianist (memoir until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 19:11, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Loony-bin has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 January 14 § Loony-bin until a consensus is reached. Crouch, Swale (talk) 22:12, 14 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chessgames.com, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chessgames.com (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 11 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]