User talk:Typative

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Mahe, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Mahe was changed by Typative (u) (t) blanking the page on 2009-09-17T18:14:02+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 18:14, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to President of the United States, though well-intentioned, had the effect of breaking the template displaying the incumbent president. Of you feel strongly that the template should say "President" instead of "incumbent", the place to take this up is at Template talk:Infobox Political post. However, since this is a general template (i.e., not just for the president of the US), and since former presidents are still referred to as "President", it's really best to leave it as "incumbent" because this is both accurate and unambiguous. siafu (talk) 20:54, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Sweaty-Toothed Madmen requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Rorshacma (talk) 22:07, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article Dayspring Campground Ministries has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This appears to be a non-notable organisation.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Smcg8374 (talk) 07:34, 19 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dayspring Campground Ministries is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dayspring Campground Ministries until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Smcg8374 (talk) 01:10, 25 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

In response to your question at AfD, yes, coverage in the media is exactly what is required for any article on a person or organization. Places don't necessarily need that as their significance is proven by their existence, which can be shown by a map or census data. Please don't take it personally; the policy is uniform and not being arbitrarily applied. My suggestion would be to crank up some PR, send some press releases and get some coverage. Almost every paper of any size at all has a religion editor. They are usually hungry for something new to write about. Good Luck. Even if your article gets deleted, you can put it back after you have some references. I ran a faith based service organization for a few years. Although somewhat distasteful, PR is needed for more reasons than just establishing notability at Wikipedia. Many charities giving grants to help projects like yours want to see some PR as part of their granting process. Gtwfan52 (talk) 18:49, 25 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your testimony about the appliances was a wonderful example of the Master's touch on your organization. You are blessed. It has been my experience, however, that God more often answers prayers for organizations like yours by providing people who can solve problems rather than the actual solution to the problem. When I was running the faith-based service organization mentioned above, I many times told my pastor, "God isn't going to fix our problems; he will give us a toolbox and tell us to fix them ourselves!" Gtwfan52 (talk) 18:57, 25 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Center for the Study of Higher Education (CSHE), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Faculty (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:43, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The article Master of Arts in Higher Education and Student Development has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

What makes this course offered by one university notable? Wikipedia is not a course catalog

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]