User talk:Stuartyeates

Index 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26

This page has archives. Topics inactive for 30 days are automatically archived 2 or more at a time by Lowercase sigmabot III if there are more than 5.

This is Stuartyeates's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26Auto-archiving period: 30 days

<--

Stuartyeates is taking a short wikibreak and will be back on Wikipedia soon.

-->

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• How to edit a page
• Editing tutorial
• Picture tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Naming conventions
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome! -- Graham ☺ | Talk 11:01, 22 Dec 2004 (UTC)

The article ISO_12620 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Content merged with Linguistic categories#ISO 12620 (ISO TC37 Data Category Registry, ISOcat as recommended after requested move 8 May 2020

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

The article Alice Ethel Minchin has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article does not establish notability of the subject.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Hello! I appreciate you editing my article. I just had some questions about the comments you made. In your comment, you mentioned "almost none of the content is actually supported by the references". However, I went through and confirmed that the citations are referenced in each spot they appear within the article. Do you have an example of where this is not successful so I know what to better fix? Additionally, I have worked to include other outside references. Because much of the detailed information comes from the college's website, that is why I include a handful of those. However, I have multiple notable mentions in various news outlets to showcase the topic's notability. I just wanted to follow up so I can better make edits. Thank you!

Please rate the article Uthiyur on quality scale. It seems to be a good article.

Hello Stuartyeates,

Much has happened since the last newsletter over two months ago. The open letter finished with 444 signatures. The letter was sent to several dozen people at the WMF, and we have heard that it is being discussed but there has been no official reply. A related article appears in the current issue of The Signpost. If you haven't seen it, you should, including the readers' comment section.

Awards: Barnstars were given for the past several years (thanks to MPGuy2824), and we are now all caught up. The 2021 cup went to John B123 for leading with 26,525 article reviews during 2021. To encourage moderate activity, a new "Iron" level barnstar is awarded annually for reviewing 360 articles ("one-a-day"), and 100 reviews earns the "Standard" NPP barnstar. About 90 reviewers received barnstars for each of the years 2018 to 2021 (including the new awards that were given retroactively). All awards issued for every year are listed on the Awards page. Check out the new Hall of Fame also.

Software news: Novem Linguae and MPGuy2824 have connected with WMF developers who can review and approve patches, so they have been able to fix some bugs, and make other improvements to the Page Curation software. You can see everything that has been fixed recently here. The reviewer report has also been improved.

Suggestions:

• There is much enthusiasm over the low backlog, but remember that the "quality and depth of patrolling are more important than speed".
• Reminder: an article should not be tagged for any kind of deletion for a minimum of 15 minutes after creation and it is often appropriate to wait an hour or more. (from the NPP tutorial)
• Reviewers should focus their effort where it can do the most good, reviewing articles. Other clean-up tasks that don't require advanced permissions can be left to other editors that routinely improve articles in these ways (creating Talk Pages, specifying projects and ratings, adding categories, etc.) Let's rely on others when it makes the most sense. On the other hand, if you enjoy doing these tasks while reviewing and it keeps you engaged with NPP (or are guiding a newcomer), then by all means continue.
• This user script puts a link to the feed in your top toolbar.

Backlog:

Saving the best for last: From a July low of 8,500, the backlog climbed back to 11,000 in August and then reversed in September dropping to below 6,000 and continued falling with the October backlog drive to under 1,000, a level not seen in over four years. Keep in mind that there are 2,000 new articles every week, so the number of reviews is far higher than the backlog reduction. To keep the backlog under a thousand, we have to keep reviewing at about half the recent rate!

		The New Page Patroller's Barnstar
		This award is given in recognition of Stuartyeates for accumulating at least 350 points in the January–February 2026 NPP backlog drive. Your contributions helped review 27,750 articles and 7,050 redirects during the drive. Thank you so much for taking part and helping reduce the backlog! – DreamRimmer ■ 17:04, 4 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

		Backlog Crusher Award
		This award is given in recognition of Stuartyeates for reviewing at least 50 pages that were more than 40 days old at the time of review during the January–February 2026 NPP backlog drive. Your contributions helped reduce the older backlog and made an important impact during the drive. Thank you so much for taking part and helping reduce the backlog! – DreamRimmer ■ 17:12, 4 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

		Two-Month Endurance Award
		This award is given in recognition of Stuartyeates for participating throughout the January–February 2026 NPP backlog drive, maintaining at least 15 points per week across all eight weeks of the drive. Your steady contributions made an important impact throughout both phases. Thank you so much for taking part and helping reduce the backlog! – DreamRimmer ■ 17:17, 4 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

		Geneva mechanism Award
		This award is given in recognition of Stuartyeates for accumulating at least 25 points during each week of Phase 1 of the January–February 2026 NPP backlog drive. Your contributions helped review 27,750 articles and 7,050 redirects during the drive. Thank you so much for taking part and helping reduce the backlog! – DreamRimmer ■ 17:27, 4 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

		Asymmetric Epicyclic Gears Award
		This award is given in recognition of Stuartyeates for accumulating at least 50 points during each week of Phase 2 of the January–February 2026 NPP backlog drive. Your contributions helped review 27,750 articles and 7,050 redirects during the drive. Thank you so much for taking part and helping reduce the backlog! – DreamRimmer ■ 17:32, 4 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
2,125		Latin America (talk)	Add sources
78		Riot Vanguard (talk)	Add sources
9		Eziowelle (talk)	Add sources
311		Paranoid personality disorder (talk)	Add sources
13		Nafada (talk)	Add sources
9		Alor, Anambra (talk)	Add sources
12		Awkuzu (talk)	Cleanup
53		Shenzhen Middle School (talk)	Cleanup
139		Common Object Request Broker Architecture (talk)	Cleanup
15		Isiala-Ngwa North (talk)	Expand
123		Prostitution in Canada (talk)	Expand
143		Makazole Mapimpi (talk)	Expand
11		History of Panama (1964–1977) (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
207		Gang sign (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
423		Commuter rail (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
125		National Defense Area (talk)	Merge
4		Davuilevu (talk)	Merge
14		Harold Washington Party (talk)	Merge
10		Gordon Grant (actor) (talk)	Wikify
199		Egyptology (talk)	Wikify
309		Billy Herrington (talk)	Wikify
3		Akili Ogidi (talk)	Orphan
3		Amaetiti (talk)	Orphan
3		Abd al-Salam al-Fazazzi (talk)	Orphan
28		Jeannette Wing (talk)	Stub
5		Celso Jaque (talk)	Stub
16		Enugu South (talk)	Stub
15		Orumba South (talk)	Stub
13		National University of the Littoral (talk)	Stub
16		Sagbama (talk)	Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:19, 5 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]