User talk:Streamline8988

Hello, Streamline8988, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The Wikipedia Adventure (a fun interactive editing tutorial that takes about an hour)
• Wikipedia Teahouse (a user-friendly help forum)
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, or you can click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! We are so glad you are here! Jim1138 (talk) 08:58, 1 January 2018 (UTC)`[reply]

Thanks for using them. In the future though, please use something more appropriate rather than unrelated statements. Describing what you changed and why is probably the best approach. Dawnseeker2000 19:18, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Question: Ever used any other accounts on Wikipedia? Thanks, Dawnseeker2000 05:30, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. The summaries are helpful to people browsing an article's history, so it is important that you use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did. Feel free to use the sandbox to make test edits. Thank you. Septrillion (talk) 02:19, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

As far as I can see, your contributions in this article seem to be constructive and very helpful, but some people might think you are inserting vandalism because of your "funny" edit summaries, so please try to be serious.--יניב הורון (talk) 20:14, 2 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 9M133 Kornet, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Iraqi (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Toophan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Iranian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:35, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Mount Rushmore. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges.

(1) If an image or other content has been in the article for a while, is stable content, and is appropriate, it's better to use the talk page to discuss whether the content/image should be replaced - especially if your change has been challenged. Don't just keep reverting to your preferred version.
(2) You edited boldly, your edit was challenged reasonably by reversion back to the stable image, now it's time for you to start a discussion on the talk page. Please see WP:BRD for more.
(3) You're obviously not new here. What other account(s) have you edited with? -- ψλ ● ✉ ✓ 15:43, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Qods Mohajer, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page COTS (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:36, 6 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of catgirls, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tesla (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:33, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Sadid-345.

A New Page Patroller Onel5969 just tagged the page as having some issues to fix, and wrote this note for you:

Please remember that Twitter is not a reliable source.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can reply over here and ping me. Or, for broader editing help, you can talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:06, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Can you take a look at the articles MPATGM and Nag missile. A user has published a lot of edits without summary. I am asking you since you are an expert in ATGMs.--Vaibhavafro(Talk!) 09:00, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Of course man, I'll get on that. Thanks for your work on MPATGM by the way, I really like what you've done with it. Streamline8988 (talk) 18:45, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Samad (UAV), did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Stop adding unreliable sources and tweet posts for WP:OR and WP:SYNTH SharabSalam (talk) 00:08, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Samad (UAV); that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. SharabSalam (talk) 01:05, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is rich considering you're the very person who's reverting my edits. Streamline8988 (talk) 01:07, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Option contract, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page UCC (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:25, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. It seems we disagree about these sources, so I asked for third opinions on Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard. Pahlevun (talk) 14:42, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for letting me know. Streamline8988 (talk) 16:36, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:52, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Fajr-3 launch.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. — Alexis Jazz (talk or ping me) 11:23, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that you moved HESA Shahed 129 to Shahed 129 and HESA Shahed 149 Gaza to Shahed 149 Gaza on the grounds that they are the "common name". Per WP:AIR/NC, the manufacturer's name should be included in the title. While you're correct that most sources drop the manufacturer's name when referring to the aircraft, that is the case with most aircraft (how often do you see "North American P-51 Mustang" instead of "P-51 Mustang"). - ZLEA _T\^C 13:55, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kaman-12 (UAV), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page HESA.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:14, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, this notice is for everyone who took part in the 2023 RfC on lists of airline destinations. I have started a new RfC on the subject. If you would like to participate please follow this link: Wikipedia talk:What Wikipedia is not § RfC on WP:NOT and British Airways destinations. Sunnya343 (talk) 01:26, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]