User talk:SimpleObjects-9ei

SimpleObjects-9ei is suffering from injuries. This may affect his ability to work on Wikipedia. Consequently, he may not be able to respond to talk-page messages or e-mails in a timely manner. Your patience for the user's recovery is greatly appreciated.

This is SimpleObjects-9ei's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed

	Archives (archived every 90 days): no archives yet (create)

🌸🌸🌸

Test. Test (talk) 00:00, 1 January 1970 (UTC)[reply]

The page Especial:Registro has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it was a redirect from the article namespace to a different namespace except the Category, Template, Wikipedia, Help, or Portal namespaces.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion review. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:30, 14 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I understand. Was a broken redirect to Special:Log anyway. SimpleObjects-9ei (talk) 15:11, 14 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi SimpleObjects-9ei. Thank you for your work on 9:41 AM. Another editor, MPGuy2824, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

not mentioned in target page

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 10:48, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@MPGuy2824: Understood. I actually found out in these two links: ^{[1] [2]} and some Apple advertisements. 😉 SimpleObjects-9ei (talk) 13:26, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

The problem is that without a mention (with a good reference), readers will be surprised. If it isn't worth adding to the target page, then the redirect also doesn't make sense to keep. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 14:40, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Waxworker. Thank you for editing Wikipedia. I noticed that some of the linking you did at Combat of Giants: Dinosaurs 3D via the Add a Link structured task appears to have added an inappropriate link.

Please keep in mind that the link suggestions you are shown are machine-generated and will be wrong some of the time. Your role in the task is to identify which suggestions are correct and add only those links.

We value a small number of good edits over a larger number with more errors, so you are encouraged to edit slowly at a pace that makes you confident in your judgements. Editors who rush through the task and make many errors may be restricted.

If you have any questions about the Add a Link task, feel free to reply to ask me or to submit a question to your mentor. linked newspaper The Guardian does not appear relevant Waxworker (talk) 08:27, 18 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I understand. Was not my fault 😉 SimpleObjects-9ei (talk) 18:56, 18 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect 9:41 AM has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 March 9 § 9:41 AM until a consensus is reached. GSK (talk • edits) 00:35, 9 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Feedmepaperr. I noticed that you recently made an edit in which your edit summary did not appear to describe the change you made. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. feedmepaperr (talk) 21:59, 9 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I understand, I understand. Was not totally my fault. 😉 - SimpleObjects-9ei (talk) 22:54, 9 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

In more-or-less the same vein, you are characterizing a huge percentage of your edits as Minor.

When you have time, please check out the Wikipedia definition and instructions for minor edits. You'll see that they should be TRULY trivial. A good example is deleting an unnecessary comma.

Just like an accurate edit summary makes a lot of difference to other editors, understanding whether something is truly minor is important for the future evolution of the article.

Thanks for all your work! You've made a lot of edits in a very short period of time. Be well!! Left Central (talk) 04:51, 14 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2026 Minecraft source code leak is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2026 Minecraft source code leak until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

GSK (talk • edits) 16:48, 13 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Serge, an Admin here on Wikipedia. I see you're on the newer side, so I wanted to make sure you were aware of WP:NOTWEBHOST. I've noticed you have...a lot of sub user pages, particularly in proportion to your overall edit count, which is rather low.

Its fine to make sub pages, but you'll want to make sure that they're somehow related to some sort of constructive work you're doing on Wikipedia. For example, this one is fine - its pretty normal to have sub page to organize your draft ideas. Some of your other ones are more iffy though. This and this really aren't related to building an encyclopedia. And others just simply aren't necessary any time soon - there's no need to be creating sub-pages for when you're going to be an admin or a checkuser. It generally takes years for those sorts of rights, so there's really no need to have those sorts of things mapped out already.

My two cents - you've only been here a couple months. I'd focus more of your time on learning how the website works and getting good at editing, rather than all this stuff. Make sure you understand how to identify reliable sources, how to interpret out notability guidelines, etc. Sergecross73 msg me 16:44, 16 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I understood. Just wanted a folder to store all what I can think of during my career. And I have to say the story of why I created all these subpages:

I created an article called 2026 Minecraft source code leak in March 13, 2026. However, minutes after publishing it was nominated for deletion, and I wanted to keep it. (As of writing) 8 commented redirect to Minecraft#Bedrock Edition and console editions, and 2 commented delete. So I created a drafts section. Also, I had to create these folders because I wanted a custom signature, but I think it'd end up more than the character limit (255 bytes), so I wrote the signature (it ended up being 365 bytes), placed it in and voila it worked.

So sorry if I didn't understand Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not#Wikipedia is not a blog, web hosting service, social networking service, or memorial site. - SimpleObjects-9ei 🔥/🎰/😴 19:12, 16 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, having user pages for drafts is completely acceptable - I have one myself at User:Sergecross73/sandbox, where I list off various drafts and article ideas for the future. It's just that some of that other stuff is probably starting to veer off a bit. Sergecross73 msg me 19:20, 16 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Sergecross73 Additionally, I forgot to say:

It takes money to host a website. I'm in South America, and I'm planning to visit all 50 U.S. states somewhere near the end of this year and not waste money on a stupid website that will definitely not last long. Traveling also takes money, but your brain does the decision: host a website ($19.99/mo) or travel to the United States (~+$2,000, a.k.a wikibreak).

Thank you. - SimpleObjects-9ei 🔥/🎰/😴 14:31, 30 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:椿, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:椿 and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:椿 during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. GSK (talk • edits) 21:52, 16 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I noticed that you added content at Wikipedia:Responding to threats of harm and incorrectly marked the edit as "minor". On Wikipedia, "minor edit" means superficial edits like fixing typos or totally uncontroversial changes like reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that adds content or otherwise changes the meaning of an article is not minor. As well, you wrote "feel free to revert" in the edit summary, but marking it as "minor" implies that the edit is extremely unlikely to be reverted, so that's counter-productive. All the best — W.andrea (talk) 02:44, 17 March 2026 (UTC) edited 17:51[reply]

Literally read the entire guideline about minor edits and realized. Thanks for informing me! - SimpleObjects-9ei 🔥/🎰/😴 19:07, 17 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Happy to help! — W.andrea (talk) 19:15, 17 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again, I removed your custom title styling because it was completely illegible. Sorry to barge in and do this, but it's in the best interest of the project. See the talk page guidelines: "User talk pages must serve their primary purpose, which is to make communication and collaboration among editors easier." — W.andrea (talk) 02:50, 17 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Oh so sorry man. I always liked styling my user pages with DISPLAYTITLE in Segoe UI since the very beginning.  - SimpleObjects-9ei 🔥/🎰/😴 19:02, 17 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

No worries! It wasn't the font, more so the colour: white on white (default light theme background). I considered fixing it by adding a background-color, but I couldn't find one that contrasted well with white, blue-grey, and mid yellow. — W.andrea (talk) 19:13, 17 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! It's the fact that I use dark mode to edit, so you were probably on light mode. Can I still add the Segoe UI font? 😉 - SimpleObjects-9ei 🔥/🎰/😴 19:19, 17 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

You know what, I didn't even notice the font. Yeah, you can reinstate it. Personally, I'd rather keep the default for a user talk page, but it doesn't hurt the readability, so sure. I'm just a grumpy minimalist :p — W.andrea (talk) 19:26, 17 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please explain why you made this edit?-- Ponyo^{bons mots} 21:42, 24 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Do you want me to explain? Okay! So...:

These used to be edits made by trusted users using Twinkle or Huggle in where they were trying to warn SineCosineTangentDisruptiom (it's so hard to spell his name) for vandalism, such as a final warning for vandalism on Sigma Boy. However, when the user was finally blocked, the user still had TPA access, and SineCosineTangentDisruptiom removed part of previous warnings and replaced them with "Goofy ahh brainrot 💀" like too many times. Their talk page access was revoked by the admin Isabelle Belato, however I wanted to resurrect the previous warnings for several purposes which, because I didn't read the whole Manual of Style and all Wikipedia namespace articles, don't know what the thing is. - SimpleObjects-9ei 🔥/🎰/😴 22:10, 24 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I have no idea what you're trying to say. The editor had their talk page access revoked over a year ago. There is no reason whatsoever for you to retore old warnings there.-- Ponyo^{bons mots} 22:18, 24 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

The article Hardest has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Stub, unlikely there will ever be a notable article here, violates WP:NOTDICT and does not appear to meet the criteria for WP:POINTWIKT.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion based on established criteria.

If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion of the article at any time. GSK (talk • edits) 01:16, 30 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@GSK I thought you were asleep! Anyway, thanks for demolishing another one of my projects. I am never participating in the deletion discussion. - SimpleObjects-9ei 🔥/🎰/😴 14:14, 30 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

The article shouldn't have been created to begin with, it serves literally no purpose. Wikipedia itself is not a dictionary. That's what Wiktionary is for. GSK (talk • edits) 15:12, 30 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I'm already getting Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary. In fact, I didn't even make a single edit on Wiktionary, so I have to stop being lazy and do some work, like improving Hardest. In other words, it must have been the wind. - SimpleObjects-9ei 🔥/🎰/😴 15:28, 30 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

lol ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:09, 15 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again I just want to ask you for some help. On February month I was using an account 4-02-2026ado666 which is latter blocked. Before I get blocked I was editing on two pages called Adnan and Adnan (name). I do mistakes I didn't want, then I using an temporary accounts for editing on these pages so I didn't like what I see in revision history, well I'm about to ask you for revision deletion. ~2026-23312-93 (talk) 00:17, 16 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I'm sorry! It's that I caught the wrong capitalization and were using Real-Time Recent Changes by Krinkle. Whenever there's a warning icon, I check the edit, and revert it if it's THAT bad. I apologize for all around and you can redo your edit. - SimpleObjects-9ei 🌸/🌻/🌞 00:29, 16 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]