User talk:Rustyfence

 Joe  I 03:23, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there, here's a few tips for editing. With headings (and article titles, and words in general), we don't normally use capitals unless there is some special reason to. We also only use boldface for the article's subject (though there are exceptions). Richard001 (talk) 10:20, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A reminder, regarding mutualism, that we don't use capitals in section headings unless needed. Richard001 (talk) 05:38, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure if you knew this, but it isn't necessary to write about yourself in the 3rd person on your userpage. Unless you like it that way! Anyhow, I replied to your query about video game userboxen. xenocidic (talk) 04:45, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

~RayLast ^«Talk!» 13:08, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Are you done with your revisions? Your last edit was seven days ago so I'm going to pull the revamp tag off unless you're still using it. Lemme know, thank you. --AeronPrometheus (talk) 18:25, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I tried to fix your Xbox Live userbox, But your gamertag seems to be entered wrong. If you want to let me know the proper typing of it, I can try again. xenocidic (talk) 17:26, 20 April 2008 (UTC) That's very odd. I could've sworn that's exactly my Xbox gamertag... I'll check back about that... Rustyfence (talk) 17:53, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I've reversed your changes to the section headers because they imply that the first disclosures were in 2013. The article tells about other disclosures that began in 1972. Thanks for bringing up the scope of the article for discussion; I've replied to your proposal. —rybec 11:45, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:19, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The article Virus Locker has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable software stub (WP:NSOFT).

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DrStrauss talk 15:45, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Government Blockchain Association, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

• It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
• It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. PlotHelpful (talk) 07:41, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Firstly, your article wasn't deleted, it got moved to Draft:Government Blockchain Association. Thanks for your edit summary on its creation - "NOTE: I am associated with the government blockchain association". The following notices are relevant to your situation, the first links to the proper form for disclosing your conflict of interest and the second outlines additional house-rules concerning blockchain articles :-

Hello, Rustyfence. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
• disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you.

Happy editing, Cabayi (talk) 12:39, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Rustyfence. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Government Blockchain Association".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. CptViraj (📧) 08:47, 15 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Stormtrooper Effect.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused, user-created with no apparent encyclopedic use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. mattbr 10:23, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]