User talk:Risk Engineer

This is Risk Engineer's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed

Archives: 1

Archives

1

Hello, greetings. Have rewritten Indian National Congress article but it became very lengthy. Need grammatical review. Will you please help me. Thank you. 25 CENTS VICTORIOUS ^☣ 15:28, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello back to you... thanks for the offer but I have to decline. I know nothing about the project you're working on and my learning curve on this matter would be very steep. I have a lot I am working on in my areas without getting into a new area such as foreign political parties. BTW: I read your user page and I concur with your observations about technical articles. My regrets I can't help you on this article. Many thanks, Risk Engineer (talk) 19:03, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

To request copy editing, add the template at the top of articles like Ando Cloisonné Company, or use Wikipedia:Twinkle with a reason for copyediting , or place a request for an article to be copyediting at Wikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors/Requests.--Dthomsen8 (talk) 14:08, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

(To unsubscribe, remove your username here.) 21:22, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

Hi. Your contributions to the Wikipedia articles are appreciated. However, there are a number of style and formatting policies and principles that apply to Wiki articles generally, and there are some that have evolved more specifically in the railroad articles. There is information in the Wiki Help section on these points, e.g. MOS:IMAGES. I will try to address your specific questions here, but I encourage you to look at the Wiki Manual of Style and some other railroad-related articles for examples.

"c/e" is an abbreviation for copyedit.

The railroad infobox is a quick summary of a railroad company or rail line particulars. It may include an image (common practice is to use a photo of a station or locomotive) and a map. There being no other photographs or illustrations yet available, it was practical to place the letterhead graphic there. It is not common practice to place a large banner-type image at the top of an article, and certainly not if it is merely a letterhead graphic. (Even in an article such as the Grand Canyon, where the use of a wide photo is appropriate, there is a right-justified photo in an infobox at the top of the article. Wider, panoramic photos appear further down in that article.)

Regarding images and the PRR letterhead. The PRR had hundreds of predecessor and subsidiary companies. It's not appropriate or useful to have images about the PRR on all of its subsidiary pages. An article about a subsidiary should talk mainly about that subsidiary, and have images that depict the subsidiary. The article can include an explanation of the subsidiary's relationship to the parent company; i.e., when it was bought and sold, how it was operated, etc. (I made some edits to the bridge article in this regard.) The images on the F&PL page should depict the F&PL directly, i.e. illustrations of photos of rolling stock, depots, junctions, maps, documents, etc. The current images of the F&PL documents, although somewhat obscure, are on topic. The photo of the B&O iron rail, while interesting, has nothing to do the with F&PL. It could be posted on the B&O page, or in an article about iron rail manufacturing, perhaps.

Material that's directly about the PRR, such as a logo, would be placed on the main PRR page itself. The PRR was, for many years, the largest US railroad, and accordingly it has a long article with many images, which has been edited by many knowledgable people. You could try adding the letterhead image there, but you may find that other editors do not concur on its importance.

The rules about the standard sections at the bottom of the article are laid out in the Manual of Style. The "See also" section contains only links to other Wikipedia articles (internal links). References that directly support the article go in the "References" section, preferably with in-line citations. Links to other related material goes in the "External links" section, each with a brief label.

Thanks for your interest and best of luck with your editing. Caseyjonz (talk) 04:07, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

(To unsubscribe, remove your username here.) 21:17, 23 July 2014 (UTC)

Come one and come all. To a presentation at the Laurel Historical Society about how you can help verify, validate, and edit the information that is on the front line of local history.

• Show the Internet who is the better editor.
• Be the creator of culture that you know you are.
• Spread the knowledge of noteworthy people who no one but you cares about.
• Lead the charge to a better Wikipedia --- eventually.

Geraldshields11 (talk) 02:08, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

See you at the Laurel Pool Room, 9th and Main Street, Laurel, MD on Thursday, September 11, 2014 at 7:00 PM EST. See http://www.meetup.com/Wikimedia-DC/events/205494212/ for more information. Geraldshields11 (talk) 02:13, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The WikiSalon is a special meetup usually held during the first and third full weeks of every month, from 7 PM to 9 PM. It's an informal gathering of Wikimedia enthusiasts, who come together to discuss Wikimedia wikis and collaboratively edit. There's no set agenda, and guests are welcome to recommend articles for the group to edit or edit on their own.

If you're coming by Metro, the closest station is Dupont Circle (on the Red Line). If you're driving, a lot of parking opens up downtown after 6:30 PM, so finding a parking space (even a free one) should be easy. Once you've found the building, go to Cove on the second floor. We will be in the conference room.

When: Wednesday, September 17, 2014 at 7:00 PM to 9:00 PM

Where: The Cove, Dupont Circle, 1730 Connecticut Avenue NW, 2nd floor, 20009, DC

For more information, see http://www.meetup.com/Wikimedia-DC/events/205500822/

My best regards, Geraldshields11 (talk) 02:25, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimedia DC's Upcoming meetups

• Thursday, September 11: “Wikipedia and YOUR History: Taking Control of the Internet, One Article at a Time!”

  A presentation at the Laurel Historical Society about how you can help verify, validate, and edit the information that is on the front line of local history. Laurel Pool Room, 9th and Main Street in Laurel, MD. 7 PM.

• Wednesday, September 17: WikiSalon

  Come for the pizza, stay for the conversation. 7 PM – 9 PM

• Saturday, September 20: September Meetup

  Get dinner and drinks with fellow Wikipedians! 6 PM

• Sunday, September 21: Laurel History Edit-a-Thon

  Local history for Wikipedia! 10:15 AM – 4 PM

• Saturday, September 27 – Sunday, September 28: Please RSVP for the Open Government WikiHack at Eventbrite by clicking on the link. The National Archives and Records Administration and Wikimedia DC are teaming up to come up with solutions that help integrate government data into Wikipedia. 10:30 AM – 5 PM each day

My best regards, Geraldshields11 (talk) 22:50, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

(To unsubscribe, remove your username here.) 21:20, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

(To unsubscribe, remove your username here.) 02:22, 8 December 2014 (UTC)

(To unsubscribe, remove your username here.) 03:11, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

(To unsubscribe, remove your username here.) 18:20, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

To unsubscribe from this newsletter, remove your name from this list. 02:25, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

To remove yourself from this mailing list, remove your name from this list. 22:18, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

In one of the previous years you either attended or expressed interest in attending the Frederick Wiknic. I'd like to invite you to come to this year's Wiknic, which will be held on Sunday 2 August 2015 at 12:00 PM at Baker Park in Frederick, Maryland. You can find more information on the events meetup page. Zell Faze (talk) 22:53, 20 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:29, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings,

I was at the library the other day looking through their microfilm, and I was unable to locate these two articles. Would you happen to have another copy of them? The links went bad.

"PRR elections, page 2". The Frederick News, Vol. 19, no. 83. January 22, 1896. Retrieved 11 July 2013.^{[dead link]}

"PRR elections, page 5". The Frederick News, Vol. 19, no. 116. February 1895. Retrieved 11 July 2013.^{[dead link]}

Fpl-dmatzrott (talk) 20:00, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The second the reference is actually from the first of March as far as I can tell too. There was no Feb 29 day that year, but that issue does correspond to the March 1 issue of that year. Fpl-dmatzrott (talk) 20:03, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Risk Engineer. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the article Frederick and Pennsylvania Line Railroad Museum, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, please:

• avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your circle, your organization, its competitors, projects or products;
• instead propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
• when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
• avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
• exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. Fpl-dmatzrott (talk) 14:58, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm Pmaccabe. Risk Engineer, thanks for creating Henry R Campbell!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Without reliable sources to indicate the inventions and accomplishments referenced the article may not meet verifiability and notability guidelines. He sounds like an interesting person, I hope you can find some better sources to show it.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Phil (talk) 14:58, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I was able to find the patent he filed on Feb 5, 1836 and moved a reference over from the 4-4-0 article that talks about it, which is where I found the date. Both are now linked in the article, you could even take a picture of the patent page and upload it to Wikipedia Commons if you wanted, it might be nice to include on both pages. Phil (talk) 16:45, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks fro the help... Campbell was linked to a number of influential persons in that period...Haupt studied him ..Campbell may have been the actual person behind horseshoe curve...not Haupt... his Gettysburg railroad location possibly had the first horseshoe curve crossing of the Alleghenies some 15 years before the PRR...

Risk Engineer (talk) 16:50, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited W. Hasell Wilson, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Surveyor. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:20, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I believe I have corrected the issue ...Thanks Risk Engineer (talk) 19:07, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your addition to W. Hasell Wilson has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. — Ninja Diannaa (Talk) 13:56, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited John M. Fessenden, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Boston and Worcester. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:42, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the comment ...fixed the link... Risk Engineer (talk) 19:16, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Would you mind going back and citing your sources for your two recent additions to Timeline of pre-statehood Montana history? It would be much appreciated! Sources are not consistently used throughout portions of the timeline and it would be helpful to all to avoid the problem of unsourced entries. Thanks!KingJeff1970 (talk) 22:31, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done! ...thanks for the comment ... Risk Engineer (talk) 13:09, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from 4-4-0 into 4-2-0. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was moved, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 00:48, 7 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the info,I had wondered about this and when I read the recent changes in terms of service saw the material on attributing to other wiki articles... I will go back to some of the articles I have written and do this ...Risk Engineer (talk) 13:08, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Risk Engineer, I have restored the generic drawing of the American wheel arrangement in the article 4-4-0, in keeping with the layout followed in nearly all the steam wheel arrangement articles, to replace the dimensional drawing of a specific and identifiable locomotive model which you inserted at the head of the article. Since the particular locomotive class in File:4-4-0 diagram.png can be identified, that diagram should rather be used in a section dealing with that particular engine. André Kritzinger (talk) 12:09, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Risk Engineer (talk) 16:17, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You are invited to participate in the 20,000 Challenge, aiming for 20,000 article improvements and creations for articles relating to the United States. This effort began on November 1, 2016 and to reach our goal, we will need editors like you to participate, expand, and create. See more here!

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:41, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Some of the material you included in the above article appears to have been copied from the copyright web page http://www.prrths.com/newprr_files/Hagley/PRR1886.pdf. Copying text directly from a source is a copyright violation. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, some content had to be removed. Please leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions or if you think I made a mistake. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 18:53, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

Yes, How is it going? My students are really struggling with Wikipedia. Any advice? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Drathen (talk • contribs) 13:53, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'll let you know how its going over the next week ... so far so good though ... Risk Engineer (talk) 14:24, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Risk Engineer. Please note that I merged Grand Challenges (disambiguation) into Grand Challenges as an unopposed merger proposal. I hope this doesn't affect the ongoing educational assignment that the page appears to be the subject of (you tagged the talk page here). Best regards, Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 14:04, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Schuylkill and Susquehanna Navigation Company, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page William Weston (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Schuylkill and Susquehanna Navigation Company, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Robert Morris (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I noticed your edits at Whiskey Rebellion and checked out your user page. Would you mind taking the headings on it down a level (i.e. changing level 1 to 2, 2 to 3, etc)? The level one heading in Wikipedia is used for the page title and only that ... using it for anything else makes the page more difficult to navigate for screen reader users like me. Thanks! Graham87 03:46, 1 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks for the changes ... I believe I made all the edits you suggested. did this work for you ... again thanks Risk Engineer (talk) 16:07, 1 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, all good here now. Graham87 16:15, 1 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Whiskey Rebellion, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Battle of Yorktown (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 7 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Facto Post – Issue 17 – 29 October 2018 The Editor is Charles Matthews, for ContentMine. Please leave feedback for him, on his User talk page. To subscribe to Facto Post go to Wikipedia:Facto Post mailing list. For the ways to unsubscribe, see the footer. Back numbers are here. Wikidata imaged Around 2.7 million Wikidata items have an illustrative image. These files, you might say, are Wikimedia's stock images, and if the number is large, it is still only 5% or so of items that have one. All such images are taken from Wikimedia Commons, which has 50 million media files. One key issue is how to expand the stock. Indeed, there is a tool. WD-FIST exploits the fact that each Wikipedia is differently illustrated, mostly with images from Commons but also with fair use images. An item that has sitelinks but no illustrative image can be tested to see if the linked wikis have a suitable one. This works well for a volunteer who wants to add images at a reasonable scale, and a small amount of SPARQL knowledge goes a long way in producing checklists. It should be noted, though, that there are currently 53 Wikidata properties that link to Commons, of which P18 for the basic image is just one. WD-FIST prompts the user to add signatures, plaques, pictures of graves and so on. There are a couple of hundred monograms, mostly of historical figures, and this query allows you to view all of them. commons:Category:Monograms and its subcategories provide rich scope for adding more. And so it is generally. The list of properties linking to Commons does contain a few that concern video and audio files, and rather more for maps. But it contains gems such as P3451 for "nighttime view". Over 1000 of those on Wikidata, but as for so much else, there could be yet more. Go on. Today is Wikidata's birthday. An illustrative image is always an acceptable gift, so why not add one? You can follow these easy steps: (i) log in at https://tools.wmflabs.org/widar/, (ii) paste the Petscan ID 6263583 into https://tools.wmflabs.org/fist/wdfist/ and click run, and (iii) just add cake. Links Now Wikidata is six, Signpost Special Report Find out how @TheContentMine are attempting to mine scientific and medical literature to improve the accuracy of Wikipedia., Wikimedia UK tweet and video ScienceSource and the Semantic Web sciencesource-pmc-licenses tool by Oravrattas to extract Creative Commons license information from PubMed Central pages, created at the Cambridge Wikidata Workshop Whizzy use of SPARQL to map the London Underground system, whizzed past on Twitter. Wikidata birthday events mapped by SPARQL, too d:Wikidata:Sixth Birthday/Message from dev team If you wish to receive no further issues of Facto Post, please remove your name from our mailing list. Alternatively, to opt out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery to your user talk page. Newsletter delivered by MediaWiki message delivery

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:01, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Facto Post – Issue 18 – 30 November 2018 The Editor is Charles Matthews, for ContentMine. Please leave feedback for him, on his User talk page. To subscribe to Facto Post go to Wikipedia:Facto Post mailing list. For the ways to unsubscribe, see the footer. Back numbers are here. WikiCite issue GLAM ♥ data — what is a gallery, library, archive or museum without a catalogue? It follows that Wikidata must love librarians. Bibliography supports students and researchers in any topic, but open and machine-readable bibliographic data even more so, outside the silo. Cue the WikiCite initiative, which was meeting in conference this week, in the Bay Area of California. In fact there is a broad scope: "Open Knowledge Maps via SPARQL" and the "Sum of All Welsh Literature", identification of research outputs, Library.Link Network and Bibframe 2.0, OSCAR and LUCINDA (who they?), OCLC and Scholia, all these co-exist on the agenda. Certainly more library science is coming Wikidata's way. That poses the question about the other direction: is more Wikimedia technology advancing on libraries? Good point. Wikimedians generally are not aware of the tech background that can be assumed, unless they are close to current training for librarians. A baseline definition is useful here: "bash, git and OpenRefine". Compare and contrast with pywikibot, GitHub and mix'n'match. Translation: scripting for automation, version control, data set matching and wrangling in the large, are on the agenda also for contemporary library work. Certainly there is some possible common ground here. Time to understand rather more about the motivations that operate in the library sector. Links Wikidata and Libraries: Facilitating Open Knowledge, book chapter by Mairelys Lemus-Rojas, metadata librarian and Lydia Pintscher, Wikidata Product Manager, from Leveraging Wikipedia: Connecting Communities of Knowledge (2018) LD4P and WikiCite: Opportunities for collaboration, WikiCite 2018 program abstract, Christine Fernsebner Eslao of Harvard Library Information and Technical Services and Michelle Futornick, Linked Data for Production Program Manager at Stanford University Shell Lessons for Librarians, Library Carpentry lesson At-risk content on Flickr, blogpost 3 November 2018, Andrew Gray Toward an Abstract Wikipedia, recent white paper by Wikidata founder Denny Vrandečić (Google) Account creation is now open on the ScienceSource wiki, where you can see SPARQL visualisations of text mining. If you wish to receive no further issues of Facto Post, please remove your name from our mailing list. Alternatively, to opt out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery to your user talk page. Newsletter delivered by MediaWiki message delivery

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:20, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited John S. Casement, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Grand Trunk (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:28, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Facto Post – Issue 19 – 27 December 2018 The Editor is Charles Matthews, for ContentMine. Please leave feedback for him, on his User talk page. To subscribe to Facto Post go to Wikipedia:Facto Post mailing list. For the ways to unsubscribe, see the footer. Back numbers are here. Learning from Zotero Zotero is free software for reference management by the Center for History and New Media: see Wikipedia:Citing sources with Zotero. It is also an active user community, and has broad-based language support. Besides the handiness of Zotero's warehousing of personal citation collections, the Zotero translator underlies the citoid service, at work behind the VisualEditor. Metadata from Wikidata can be imported into Zotero; and in the other direction the zotkat tool from the University of Mannheim allows Zotero bibliographies to be exported to Wikidata, by item creation. With an extra feature to add statements, that route could lead to much development of the focus list (P5008) tagging on Wikidata, by WikiProjects. There is also a large-scale encyclopedic dimension here. The construction of Zotero translators is one facet of Web scraping that has a strong community and open source basis. In that it resembles the less formal mix'n'match import community, and growing networks around other approaches that can integrate datasets into Wikidata, such as the use of OpenRefine. Looking ahead, the thirtieth birthday of the World Wide Web falls in 2019, and yet the ambition to make webpages routinely readable by machines can still seem an ever-retreating mirage. Wikidata should not only be helping Wikimedia integrate its projects, an ongoing process represented by Structured Data on Commons and lexemes. It should also be acting as a catalyst to bring scraping in from the cold, with institutional strengths as well as resourceful code. Links Zotero Comes to Google Docs, Zotero blogpost by Dan Stillman, 19 October 2018. Category:Wikipedians who use Zotero T115158 Write a Zotero translator and document process for creating new Zotero translator and getting it live in production, long Phabricator thread 2015–17. Zotero Translators, documentation from zotero.org. Home page on GitHub for Zotero translator Javascript Example translator, for Wikisource. m:Structured Data on Commons/Newsletter/2018-12-07 Diversitech, the latest ContentMine grant application to the Wikimedia Foundation, is in its community review stage until January 2. If you wish to receive no further issues of Facto Post, please remove your name from our mailing list. Alternatively, to opt out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery to your user talk page. Newsletter delivered by MediaWiki message delivery

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:08, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Facto Post – Issue 20 – 31 January 2019 The Editor is Charles Matthews, for ContentMine. Please leave feedback for him, on his User talk page. To subscribe to Facto Post go to Wikipedia:Facto Post mailing list. For the ways to unsubscribe, see the footer. Back numbers are here. Everything flows (and certainly data does) Recently Jimmy Wales has made the point that computer home assistants take much of their data from Wikipedia, one way or another. So as well as getting Spotify to play Frosty the Snowman for you, they may be able to answer the question "is the Pope Catholic?" Possibly by asking for disambiguation (Coptic?). Headlines about data breaches are now familiar, but the unannounced circulation of information raises other issues. One of those is Gresham's law stated as "bad data drives out good". Wikipedia and now Wikidata have been criticised on related grounds: what if their content, unattributed, is taken to have a higher standing than Wikimedians themselves would grant it? See Wikiquote on a misattribution to Bismarck for the usual quip about "law and sausages", and why one shouldn't watch them in the making. Wikipedia has now turned 18, so should act like as adult, as well as being treated like one. The Web itself turns 30 some time between March and November this year, per Tim Berners-Lee. If the Knowledge Graph by Google exemplifies Heraclitean Web technology gaining authority, contra GIGO, Wikimedians still have a role in its critique. But not just with the teenage skill of detecting phoniness. There is more to beating Gresham than exposing the factoid and urban myth, where WP:V does do a great job. Placeholders must be detected, and working with Wikidata is a good way to understand how having one statement as data can blind us to replacing it by a more accurate one. An example that is important to open access is that, firstly, the term itself needs considerable unpacking, because just being able to read material online is a poor relation of "open"; and secondly, trying to get Creative Commons license information into Wikidata shows up issues with classes of license (such as CC-BY) standing for the actual license in major repositories. Detailed investigation shows that "everything flows" exacerbates the issue. But Wikidata can solve it. Links Wikipedia:Wikipedia Day for 18th birthday celebrations WMUK video page, with "fake news", Jimmy Wales, Wikidata and more (health warning for those with tune allergy) Why Wikipedia’s Medical Content Is Superior, Stephen Harrison, 28 January 2019, Slate Olivia Colman reveals struggle with Wikipedia over age, Naomi Gordon, 28 January 2019, harpersbazaar.com Making Wikidata visible, Martin Poulter blogpost, 24 January 2019, Bodleian Digital Library Inventory, Magnus Manske blogpost, 24 January 2019, on Wikidata tech support for an image donation by Cleveland Museum of Art If you wish to receive no further issues of Facto Post, please remove your name from our mailing list. Alternatively, to opt out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery to your user talk page. Newsletter delivered by MediaWiki message delivery

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:53, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Facto Post – Issue 21 – 28 February 2019 The Editor is Charles Matthews, for ContentMine. Please leave feedback for him, on his User talk page. To subscribe to Facto Post go to Wikipedia:Facto Post mailing list. For the ways to unsubscribe, see the footer. Back numbers are here. What is a systematic review? Systematic reviews are basic building blocks of evidence-based medicine, surveys of existing literature devoted typically to a definite question that aim to bring out scientific conclusions. They are principled in a way Wikipedians can appreciate, taking a critical view of their sources. Ben Goldacre in 2014 wrote (link below) "[...] : the "information architecture" of evidence based medicine (if you can tolerate such a phrase) is a chaotic, ad hoc, poorly connected ecosystem of legacy projects. In some respects the whole show is still run on paper, like it's the 19th century." Is there a Wikidatan in the house? Wouldn't some machine-readable content that is structured data help? File:Schittny, Facing East, 2011, Legacy Projects.jpg Most likely it would, but the arcana of systematic reviews and how they add value would still need formal handling. The PRISMA standard dates from 2009, with an update started in 2018. The concerns there include the corpus of papers used: how selected and filtered? Now that Wikidata has a 20.9 million item bibliography, one can at least pose questions. Each systematic review is a tagging opportunity for a bibliography. Could that tagging be reproduced by a query, in principle? Can it even be second-guessed by a query (i.e. simulated by a protocol which translates into SPARQL)? Homing in on the arcana, do the inclusion and filtering criteria translate into metadata? At some level they must, but are these metadata explicitly expressed in the articles themselves? The answer to that is surely "no" at this point, but can TDM find them? Again "no", right now. Automatic identification doesn't just happen. Actually these questions lack originality. It should be noted though that WP:MEDRS, the reliable sources guideline used here for health information, hinges on the assumption that the usefully systematic reviews of biomedical literature can be recognised. Its nutshell summary, normally the part of a guideline with the highest density of common sense, allows literature reviews in general validity, but WP:MEDASSESS qualifies that indication heavily. Process wonkery about systematic reviews definitely has merit. Links Evidence-Based Practice: Appraise, resources page from Duke University Medical Library & Archives. What should Cochrane do next?, Bad Science blogpost 5 November 2014, Ben Goldacre. Cambridge (UK) Science Festival event, How do scientific discoveries become clinical medicine?, ScienceSource workshop for ContentMine 23 March 2019, with systematic review process diagram. Also on Eventbrite for tickets, taking place in Makespace, 16 Mill Lane. PROSPERO database of PRISMA, for registration of systematic review protocols. Process wonkery thread, wikien-l mailing list, September 2006. Meta-Analysis, xkcd cartoon. If you wish to receive no further issues of Facto Post, please remove your name from our mailing list. Alternatively, to opt out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery to your user talk page. Newsletter delivered by MediaWiki message delivery

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:02, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Facto Post – Issue 22 – 28 March 2019 The Editor is Charles Matthews, for ContentMine. Please leave feedback for him, on his User talk page. To subscribe to Facto Post go to Wikipedia:Facto Post mailing list. For the ways to unsubscribe, see the footer. Back numbers are here. When in the cloud, do as the APIs do Half a century ago, it was the era of the mainframe computer, with its air-conditioned room, twitching tape-drives, and appearance in the title of a spy novel Billion-Dollar Brain then made into a Hollywood film. Now we have the cloud, with server farms and the client–server model as quotidian: this text is being typed on a Chromebook. File:Cloud-API-Logo.svg The term Applications Programming Interface or API is 50 years old, and refers to a type of software library as well as the interface to its use. While a compiler is what you need to get high-level code executed by a mainframe, an API out in the cloud somewhere offers a chance to perform operations on a remote server. For example, the multifarious bots active on Wikipedia have owners who exploit the MediaWiki API. APIs (called RESTful) that allow for the GET HTTP request are fundamental for what could colloquially be called "moving data around the Web"; from which Wikidata benefits 24/7. So the fact that the Wikidata SPARQL endpoint at query.wikidata.org has a RESTful API means that, in lay terms, Wikidata content can be GOT from it. The programming involved, besides the SPARQL language, could be in Python, younger by a few months than the Web. Magic words, such as occur in fantasy stories, are wishful (rather than RESTful) solutions to gaining access. You may need to be a linguist to enter Ali Baba's cave or the western door of Moria (French in the case of "Open Sesame", in fact, and Sindarin being the respective languages). Talking to an API requires a bigger toolkit, which first means you have to recognise the tools in terms of what they can do. On the way to the wikt:impactful or polymathic modern handling of facts, one must perhaps take only tactful notice of tech's endemic problem with documentation, and absorb the insightful point that the code in APIs does articulate the customary procedures now in place on the cloud for getting information. As Owl explained to Winnie-the-Pooh, it tells you The Thing to Do. Links Wikidata as a semantic framework for the Gene Wiki initiative, 2016 paper by Andrawaag and others, commenting inter alia on the role of the API on Wikidata Working With Wikibase From Go, Digital Flapjack blogpost 26 November 2018, Michael Dales, developer for ScienceSource using golang, with a software engineer's view on Wikibase and the MediaWiki API Dealing with the Rust, Magnus Manske blogpost 12 March 2019, on the Rust language and the MediaWiki API mw:API:RecentChanges, mediawiki.org page on the API for access to "recent changes" on a wiki wikitech:Analytics/AQS/Pageviews, wikitech.wikimedia.org for the Pageview API, giving Wikimedia traffic information xkcd cartoon, API Guide If you wish to receive no further issues of Facto Post, please remove your name from our mailing list. Alternatively, to opt out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery to your user talk page. Newsletter delivered by MediaWiki message delivery

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:45, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Risk Engineer, I see you thanked me for a previous edit, and after reading your user page I realized that you might be a good person to reach out to about an article I recently created. It’s an article about legal commentator Solomon Wisenberg. He is notable in that he was Ken Starr’s Deputy Independent Counsel and the one questioning Bill Clinton when he gave the infamous “what the definition of is is” response. He has made dozens of television appearances in the last 18 months to provide insight into how these investigations work. Given your focus on public policy articles, I would love to have your feedback on the article. I have a list of reason I believe the article to be justified, I’d rather be brief here but I can share them if you like. Thanks and any feedback will be appreciated. SBCornelius (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 15:32, 12 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Facto Post – Issue 23 – 30 April 2019 The Editor is Charles Matthews, for ContentMine. Please leave feedback for him, on his User talk page. To subscribe to Facto Post go to Wikipedia:Facto Post mailing list. For the ways to unsubscribe, see the footer. Back numbers are here. Completely clouded? Talk of cloud computing draws a veil over hardware, but also, less obviously but more importantly, obscures such intellectual distinction as matters most in its use. Wikidata begins to allow tasks to be undertaken that were out of easy reach. The facility should not be taken as the real point. Coming in from another angle, the "executive decision" is more glamorous; but the "administrative decision" should be admired for its command of facts. Think of the attitudes ad fontes, so prevalent here on Wikipedia as "can you give me a source for that?", and being prepared to deal with complicated analyses into specified subcases. Impatience expressed as a disdain for such pedantry is quite understandable, but neither dirty data nor false dichotomies are at all good to have around. Issue 13 and Issue 21, respectively on WP:MEDRS and systematic reviews, talk about biomedical literature and computing tasks that would be of higher quality if they could be made more "administrative". For example, it is desirable that the decisions involved be consistent, explicable, and reproducible by non-experts from specified inputs. What gets clouded out is not impossibly hard to understand. You do need to put together the insights of functional programming, which is a doctrinaire and purist but clearcut approach, with the practicality of office software. Loopless computation can be conceived of as a seamless forward march of spreadsheet columns, each determined by the content of previous ones. Very well: to do a backward audit, when now we are talking about Wikidata, we rely on integrity of data and its scrupulous sourcing: and clearcut case analyses. The MEDRS example forces attention on purge attempts such as Beall's list. Links Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2019-03-31/In focus#The_Wikipedia_SourceWatch by Headbomb. Wikipedia:WikiProject Academic Journals/Journals cited by Wikipedia/Questionable1 d:Wikidata:ScienceSource project/Beall's list: Beall's list, final version, matched into Wikidata. SPARQL query for Quackwatch: query to find items on Wikidata for articles subject to the Quackwatch blacklist of "Nonrecommended Periodicals", under "Journals (Fundamentally Flawed)". SPARQL query to find retracted articles on Wikidata. d:Wikidata:ScienceSource project/NCBI2wikidata dashboard, metadata for biomedical articles being built up, sourced from PubMed and PubMed Central. If you wish to receive no further issues of Facto Post, please remove your name from our mailing list. Alternatively, to opt out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery to your user talk page. Newsletter delivered by MediaWiki message delivery

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:27, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Facto Post – Issue 24 – 17 May 2019 The Editor is Charles Matthews, for ContentMine. Please leave feedback for him, on his User talk page. To subscribe to Facto Post go to Wikipedia:Facto Post mailing list. For the ways to unsubscribe, see the footer. Back numbers are here. Semantic Web and TDM – a ContentMine view Two dozen issues, and this may be the last, a valediction at least for a while. It's time for a two-year summation of ContentMine projects involving TDM (text and data mining). Wikidata and now Structured Data on Commons represent the overlap of Wikimedia with the Semantic Web. This common ground is helping to convert an engineering concept into a movement. TDM generally has little enough connection with the Semantic Web, being instead in the orbit of machine learning which is no respecter of the semantic. Don't break a taboo by asking bots "and what do you mean by that?" The ScienceSource project innovates in TDM, by storing its text mining results in a Wikibase site. It strives for compliance of its fact mining, on drug treatments of diseases, with an automated form of the relevant Wikipedia referencing guideline MEDRS. Where WikiFactMine set up an API for reuse of its results, ScienceSource has a SPARQL query service, with look-and-feel exactly that of Wikidata's at query.wikidata.org. It also now has a custom front end, and its content can be federated, in other words used in data mashups: it is one of over 50 sites that can federate with Wikidata. The human factor comes to bear through the front end, which combines a link to the HTML version of a paper, text mining results organised in drug and disease columns, and a SPARQL display of nearby drug and disease terms. Much software to develop and explain, so little time! Rather than telling the tale, Facto Post brings you ScienceSource links, starting from the how-to video, lower right. Links for participation http://sciencesource-review.wmflabs.org/, review tool link in the left-hand sidebar at http://sciencesource.wmflabs.org/wiki/Main_Page The review tool requires a log in on sciencesource.wmflabs.org, and an OAuth permission (bottom of a review page) to operate. It can be used in simple and more advanced workflows. Examples of queries for the latter are at d:Wikidata_talk:ScienceSource project/Queries#SS_disease_list and d:Wikidata_talk:ScienceSource_project/Queries#NDF-RT issue. Please be aware that this is a research project in development, and may have outages for planned maintenance. That will apply for the next few days, at least. The ScienceSource wiki main page carries information on practical matters. Email is not enabled on the wiki: use site mail here to Charles Matthews in case of difficulty, or if you need support. Further explanatory videos will be put into commons:Category:ContentMine videos. If you wish to receive no further issues of Facto Post, please remove your name from our mailing list. Alternatively, to opt out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery to your user talk page. Newsletter delivered by MediaWiki message delivery

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:52, 17 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:14, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Burnside's North Carolina Expedition, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Beaufort (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:41, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Risk Engineer Risk Engineer I'm trying to add my draft to WikiProject United States Government but by typing {{WikiProject United States Government}} (without spaces of course) but it's not working. I'm also trying to find someone who will review my article.By the way I'm new to wikipedia. -thank you

Hi User:RJJ4y7, I read the talk page for user name about the Joint Artificial Intelligence Center (JAIC). I am pretty busy right now so I can't do it myself. What were you thinking about improving your draft? What about all the spell checkers and grammar programs such as "Grammarly"? Cheers Risk Engineer (talk) 19:17, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited James A. Evans, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Laramie and Medicine Bow.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:24, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the note on Charles Ellet Jr. Bibliography google books vs Haithi. I'm not as familiar with Haithi but I see you can access the full text which is nice. I'll stop making these changes.Dwkaminski (talk) 17:59, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An article you created has been moved. This is because it is not an appropriate main space article and has been moved into the wikipedia name space. noq (talk) 19:00, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:31, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:28, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Benjamin Henry Latrobe II, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Robert Morris.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:04, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Given the currency of the topic and a lack of a detailed article on WP, I've started a draft at User:Acroterion/Fracture critical bridge. While I have a general knowledge of the subject and can work out an outline, I'm not a structural engineer. Please feel free to jump in and improve, well, everything, I'd greatly appreciate it. Acroterion (talk) 03:35, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks for the suggestion, I will. Why did you choose me, or am I one of "x" seeds thrown out there? Cheers Risk Engineer (talk) 10:13, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I found you through Category:Wikipedian engineers and recognized your name from some previous contact, and geographic proximity. Acroterion (talk) 12:58, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from American Society of Civil Engineers into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. – Isochrone (talk) 19:37, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Jean-Rodolphe Perronet has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. This is your third warning. — Diannaa (talk) 21:32, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for testing out the Add A Fact browser extension! This extension was developed as an experiment by the Future Audiences team at the Wikimedia Foundation to learn about new ways of contributing to Wikipedia from outside of our website/apps.

We are planning to wrap up this experiment this December, sunsetting the extension and publishing our findings on-wiki. We’d like to invite you to take part in an exit survey to tell us more about your experience of trying out the extension, and to share any ideas you have about how to support new ways of contributing to Wikipedia. The survey is anonymous (see the survey privacy statement) and should take about 10–15 minutes to complete.

You can take the Goole Forms survey here.

Kind regards, MPinchuk (WMF)

17:13, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Baltimore and Ohio Railroad civil engineers 1827 to 1857, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page William Howard.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:55, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Baltimore and Ohio Railroad civil engineers 1827 to 1857, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Meriwether Lewis Clark.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:56, 20 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, nice to meet another engineer on here. I'm reverting this edit to David Shriver Jr. While I believe you've added some good content and flow to the article, three of the cites you add go to dead links or an irrelevant link, which seems incredibly odd to me: Cite 1, Cite 2 (not 'Cumberland Road' entry, as described), and Cite 3. I invite you to continue editing, but please take heed to add content with appropriate citations and use an archive if the links are dead. --Engineerchange (talk) 02:48, 2 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the comments. I appreciate the critique. Risk Engineer (talk) 23:31, 14 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Board of Engineers for Internal Improvements

added a link pointing to James Kearney

General Survey Act

added a link pointing to James Kearney

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:25, 22 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Charles Key Bruce requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 20:38, 2 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you send me this message? I don't remember authoring this article. Many thanks Risk Engineer (talk) 15:57, 3 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Dear colleague, this comment on a talk page appears to be AI-generated. The use of AI for communication hurts fellow editors, as AI tends to very quickly generate long and winding comments, frequently with little substance, that the humans will be forced to spend their limited time to read. Please refer to WP:LLMCOMM and WP:AITALK for details. Викидим (talk) 22:13, 31 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Dear colleague, this message has been inspired by you contribution to Centering (Masonry). The article contains the output of an LLM. As such, the use of the model needs to be disclosed along with the prompts used (see the WP:LLMDISCLOSE) and manual changes done according to the WP:LLMWRITE requirements.

For the avoidance of doubt, I use the AI model myself for experiments in article writing, see my User:Викидим/AI experience. Викидим (talk) 22:41, 31 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much!

RTSthestardust (talk) 18:39, 6 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you :) Risk Engineer (talk) 14:26, 12 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Stephen Harriman Long, links pointing to the disambiguation pages Germantown, Pennsylvania, Thomas A. Smith and Jacob Brown were added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:55, 11 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Risk Engineer. Thank you for your work on List of General Survey Act of 1824 surveys and projects. Another editor, Klbrain, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thanks for creating this article, a daughter article linked from General Survey Act#Notable surveys and projects. Given that that page isn't long, it's not entirely clear why that article wasn't just developed further with this content. Nevertheless, the current structure is coherent, although a merge would also be fine.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Klbrain}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Klbrain (talk) 02:48, 27 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Long truss, a link pointing to the disambiguation page William Howe was added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 12 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]