User talk:Rhkramer

The leaves are fairly straight and relatively narrow somewhat grower wider near the tips. Much smaller and less complexly shaped than other oak leaves. --68.51.150.110 (talk) 18:12, 20 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 17:23, 26 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:38, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Mvcg66b3r. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to KYW-TV seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 23:06, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Honestly was going with the same thing; there's been lots of issues with the re-pack for sure across the country and I had heard specifics about KYW-TV...but generally they've been on forums we cannot consider as sources here. What could have been a reliable source about this once upon a time, say The Inquirer, isn't writing about these subjects any longer (their TV critic now does general assignment reporting), so sadly, the well-sourced information we had back in 2009 is definitely not equivalent in 2019. Going through the first phase where auction stations that took the money and ran and left the airwaves in my local market was generally a pain to source and explain (one of them is a local business journal where I have to be careful which stories I click before the paywall goes up).

We do have an article about the subject on spectrum reallocation, but it certainly needs some work. And I am sorry your edit was reverted; there could have been a better explanation of why, and I would have told you that what you posted was better on the talk page than the main article, as far as the questions go (and no matter what, we wouldn't allow KYW-TV/CBS personnel to edit their own article, so you needed to search for reliable sources on your own). Nate • (chatter) 02:25, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I would have edited the information; again, it was just more of a talk post than it was something we could keep in an article. But I would not have reverted you fully and re-edited into article prose. As for the engineer's comments, until they're posted in the form of an article, like on the station's website or in a new story (and I get the feeling if this continues the station GM may need to post something to the station's website), we can't add them; as much as I'd like to put them in (and I have in the past), we have a hornet's nest of editors (which you've unfortunately run into) who seem to take any disruption to 'their' version of an article too personally and will revert and use our bureaucracy to keep things their way and drop random WP: links which have nothing to do with anything in order to keep information out. It's beyond frustrating, and I hate that this is how it has to be myself. Nate • (chatter) 20:30, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:06, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:21, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:06, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm DVdm. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Wave–particle duality, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. DVdm (talk) 18:53, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: also have a look at wp:edit warring and wp:BRD. I gave a message on the article talk page. - DVdm (talk) 18:54, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]