User talk:Reify-tech

Please place new discussions at the bottom of the talk page.

This is Reify-tech's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed

Archives: 1

I very much appreciate all the copyediting you've been doing lately! However, with Harvard station, would you be okay with waiting until I'm finished with the article (probably another week or so)? It would make it easier for me to avoid edit conflicts. I'm planning to nominate it for GA when I'm finished, so your skills will be well appreciated then. Cheers, Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:08, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that, I didn't realize that you were doing an ongoing project with that article. I will try to stay out of your way. The article looks well on its way to GA status. Reify-tech (talk) 21:49, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Side note: you may wish to consider archiving your talk page, either manually or with one of the bot options. At 170+ threads and 250+ kB, it's a bit difficult to navigate. Cheers, Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:08, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it has been badly in need of archiving, but I haven't looked into what the alternatives are. What would you recommend? Reify-tech (talk) 21:49, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There's two basic ways to do it. Manually, you just cut-and-paste a bunch of threads to User talk:Reify-tech/Archive 1 and so on. That's how I do it; it's quick and easy, and I can choose exactly which discussions. (I delete old bot notifications and event notifications). With a bot, you put a template at the top of the page, and the bot does all the archiving for you. It takes a couple minutes to set up, but then it's all automatic. Help:Archiving a talk page has more detailed instructions. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 02:29, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Per your advice, I did a massive cut-and-paste to a new archive file. At my leisure, I will delete old routine bot messages and newsletter notifications. If I had realized it was this easy, I would have done it long ago!

Although I consider myself a seasoned editor by now, I still have much to learn about Wikipedia, especially concerning practical shortcuts and obscure tweaks. I thank you for your welcoming hospitality years ago, and your still-helpful attitude today. I have tried my best to pay forward your help, by in turn helping and advising other editors who are new to Wikipedia. With appreciation, Reify-tech (talk) 17:28, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. See Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Long-term promotional editing by multiple accounts - you've placed COI notices on a couple of their talkpages, so I figured I'd let you know in case you wanted to weigh in. Hope all is well! Pi.1415926535 (talk) 08:36, 8 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Why do you think you own the content of a page of a person you do not know? The family of Harry Weese does not consider him an alcoholic and he never lost his reputation due to alcoholism lost work due to alcoholism or was an alcoholic. That is a complete fabrication cited by one person that had an axe to grind with him. As a family member I am trying to correcting this record. He was never treated or lost his reputation due to alcoholism. Did he drink? Yes, but no more than any person of his generation. You do not own this content and have no right to this non passive voice. It’s not censorship as you are claiming it is a fact and the article you cite is not true, it was just published. That does not make the content true. I consider your changing this fact back “vandalism’ and will move to have you barred from putting this content on wikipedia legally. There is no truth to it. Beewings (talk) 01:42, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Don't project your evidently strong feelings about the Wikipedia article which you have some kind of personal connection with. Your argument is with Wikipedia policy, not with me, and you should air your views on the Talkpage (Talk:Harry Weese). This will give all editors interested in the article a chance to participate in an open discussion. I am far from the first or only editor to restore the information now sourced from multiple references, which you unilaterally deleted several times without any discussion at all. I did not write the paragraph you object to; I only restored it after you abruptly deleted it, and I added another referenced footnote. My other editing of the article was to add more information about Weese's accomplishments and recognition through awards.

I don't why you picked me for your attack, while ignoring several other editors who also disagreed with your peremptory actions. I do not make the rules here, and even disagree with some of them, but I try to comply because I do not "own" Wikipedia or any of its content.

Summary: Do not make personal attacks or legalistic threats against Wikipedia editors who are just following the rules for editing here. Reify-tech (talk) 15:53, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

On behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --15:58, 29 April 2020 (UTC)

Hi there. Examining the documentation for Template:Use American English, I came across this line, The template automatically substitutes the words "article" or "template", depending on where it is placed.[1] But since it's an invisible template, I don't see that feature. I'm intending to remove it, but want to check with you first to make sure I'm not missing something. Thanks. --Bsherr (talk) 14:30, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the notice, though I'm not sure why you sent it to me. I very occasionally have used the template, but don't recall editing it or its documentation. The template is visible to editors in the Wikisource code after it has been saved once, though it is not visible in the standard reader view. The feature of autoselecting "article" or "template" seems like a flourish. otherwise harmless, as long as it is documented. Reify-tech (talk) 21:07, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I know it was a while back, but it looks like you added that line to the documentation. I linked to the diff above. The issue is I don't actually see the feature substituting the word article or template in the code. --Bsherr (talk) 03:29, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies for not following your diff link earlier; it certainly appears as if I did add that some 6 years ago, though I don't remember doing so. I honestly don't recall observing that behavior or commenting on it; it is also possible that the template code has been modified in the intervening years so that this is no longer true (if it ever was).

The bottom line is that I see no problem with your removing that statement of behavior from the documentation, especially if you currently see no evidence for it in the template source code (I'm not sure I even know how to look at it myself). I am frankly puzzled by this odd situation; you have handled it correctly, and I thank you for your courtesy in bringing it to my attention. Reify-tech (talk) 04:12, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I looked at the template code at the time of the insertion into the documentation and didn't see the feature there either. Must have just been a mistake. I'll remove it. Thanks for the help. --Bsherr (talk) 21:25, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

On behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:13, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

For being tenacious in the face of being reverted on O Holy Night and then proceeding to open a discussion. WP:CONSENSUS appears to be on your side.

Walter Görlitz (talk) 19:14, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --10:15, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --14:26, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, the information you have re-entered about the Calder Mobile is incorrect. I have removed it. This was designed, fabricated and installed by Paul Matisse, with some input from Sandy Calder, before his untimely death before it was completed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by WBryson16 (talk • contribs) 14:36, 13 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

As somebody who appears to work for the artist Paul Matisse, you have unique access to primary sources for the article, but you also must comply with Wikipedia's WP:COI policies. The information you removed was carefully referenced from the website of the National Gallery of Art in Washington DC. If you have more-accurate or up-to-date information, please discuss it on the article Talkpage Talk:Paul Matisse, and document the reliable sources (WP:RS) for your claims. Please do not discuss the article here on my Talkpage, as this page is less visible to other editors who may also be interested in the article. Reify-tech (talk) 20:26, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --10:48, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:31, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, you contributed significantly to Chopsticks. I think the article can use a holistic revision. I posted a proposal on the talk page. It would be great to have your feedback before or while the revision takes place. Fred Hsu (talk) 20:25, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --14:00, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --11:27, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:People with cataracts has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 00:37, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --11:12, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --11:04, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

For easy access to ITS, install a "telnet" program and connect to host its.pdp10.se, port 10003. Type Control+Z to access "HACTRN", the user interface. Please log in, and log out when done. Lars Brinkhoff (talk) 06:39, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! I haven't seen a live ITS since the 1980s. Reify-tech (talk) 12:43, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --11:15, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --16:59, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:28, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --15:13, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Harvard Mark I, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Implosion. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You left a note requesting an image of the warning-signage. It seems quite visible in Pvdbustunnel.JPG (infobox) and visible but partially cut off in File:Providence20June071914ShelterTunnel.jpg (gallery). Are those the signs you have in mind? Both of those images are quite large and high-resolution, so it would be easy to crop a section of interest if you wanted a separate one of the signs. DMacks (talk) 15:57, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I was hoping for higher-resolution images of both the east and west portals. The west portal picture partially crops the signage at the edge of the frame, and the signage of both pictures is a bit blurry. No big deal, but lots of people go by there every day. I would have done it myself, if I had thought of it when I was last there. Reify-tech (talk) 16:10, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I just noticed on Google Maps Street View that the signage has been changed in the years since the Wikimedia pictures, though the Google pix are blurry and it's hard to make out the wording on the newer signs. The signs do not appear to mention skateboarding specifically, which is why I had reworded the article text to avoid implying this. Reify-tech (talk) 16:38, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Second image at [2] is the west portal in 2018. The sign on the left edge (north of the north entry-arch) says "NO...SKATEBOARDS..." DMacks (talk) 06:55, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Gotcha. Google-maps does tend to blur certain text. DMacks (talk) 09:51, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for finding the Uprise RI article, which somehow I missed in my search results. The article contains a wealth of information, much of which will be useful for Wikipedia. The accompanying photos are very interesting as well, and the one you highlighted is exactly the shot I was hoping for; I doubt it is rights-cleared, but getting another shot similar to it should be straightforward to a photographer who is on-site. This is clear evidence that skateboards are explicitly banned from the tunnel. It appears that more-restrictive signs have been posted over the time since the Wikimedia Commons photos from 2005 and 2007. Reify-tech (talk) 15:48, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I've been learning a lot from your cleanup and copy-editing of the architecture stuff I am working on. Thanks again! Fothergilla (talk) 19:59, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Glad to be of help. I learned much of what I know about Wikipedia editing the same way, by observing the work of other more-experienced editors. There are online tutorials and documentation, notably the Wikipedia Manual of Style, but it is often easiest to learn by example. Reify-tech (talk) 02:01, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --10:06, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --12:52, 1 June 2022 (UTC) (UTC)[reply]

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --16:45, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --12:21, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --11:19, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

After several years of distancing, I wan to invite you tomorrow (Jan 17th at 6pm) to the Boston-gathering at MIT.

Details can be found at Wikipedia:Meetup/Boston/Wikipedia_22th_Anniversary_Celebration

Hope I can see you tomorrow  — Johannes Kalliauer - contrib. 20:47, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --14:14, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --12:45, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --10:03, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Reify-tech. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page WGBH-TV, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
• disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 21:11, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have never had, and have no present connection with WGBH or its employees, other than having an ordinary WGBH membership as a local viewer living in Boston. I have no special sources of information, other than what is readily available to the public. If I have been WP:BOLD in my recent edits to the article WGBH-TV, it is only because I could see that the article's readability, organization, and logical flow could be improved. I also linked it to the existing article on Hartford N. Gunn Jr., but made minimal changes to the latter article, other than flagging specific items needing improvement. Reify-tech (talk) 02:38, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --11:22, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Ontario Science Centre, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "generic title" error. References show this error when they have a generic placeholder title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 19:16, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --14:27, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --16:15, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Ternera. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Melrose (apple) have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Hello, I reverted your edit because of WP:SELFPUBLISH, which says that self-published material does not make a good source. Thank you. Ternera (talk) 19:38, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --13:36, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --16:32, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --11:02, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Reify-tech, You seem to have previously edited the article Shadow (Xtool). A historic book related to the topic has been mentioned on side note at humanities reference desk. This is just to keep you informed, in case, you happen to be interested in the topic. Happy editing. Bookku (talk) 11:01, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --12:16, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --16:33, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --12:49, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --17:33, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Edgar Allan Poe for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. 🍕BP!🍕 (🔔) 15:53, 21 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --18:48, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --10:18, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team – 13:10, 1 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team – 13:15, 18 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(This message was sent to User:Reify-tech and is being posted here due to a redirect.)

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team – 15:21, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(This message was sent to User:Reify-tech and is being posted here due to a redirect.)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Leak, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hazmat.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:55, 22 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team – 12:43, 29 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

(This message was sent to User:Reify-tech and is being posted here due to a redirect.)

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team – 12:05, 11 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

(This message was sent to User:Reify-tech and is being posted here due to a redirect.)