User talk:RealLegend

Yyy

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Royal Rumble (2008) has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Royal Rumble (2008) was changed by RealLegend (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.956898 on 2018-12-23T19:47:08+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:47, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Doniago. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Jurassic Bark, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Also please see WP:POV as you made additional edits that seemed to be non-neutral. DonIago (talk) 17:39, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello RealLegend. Thank you for your contribution to the page List of video games considered the best. Unfortunately, the games you added do not qualify for inclusion and I've therefore removed them. The inclusion criteria is that each game needs to have been listed on six "best games of all time" lists from different publications. If this is the case, please re-add the games and state the lists for which this is the case in the last column. Thank you. Stefvanschie (talk) 10:24, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that. RealLegend (talk) 12:50, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at 2019–20 Premier League, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Flix11 (talk) 19:14, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

could you please stop aggregating the scores on the PL articles. The whole point of the table is to show the home and away results for all the teams, you are removing this information. Spike 'em (talk) 20:07, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, your edits are really not an improvement with adding years in the section headers. Kante4 (talk) 16:34, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Jorginho (footballer, born December 1991), you may be blocked from editing. Mattythewhite (talk) 22:12, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello RealLegend and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your contributions do not conform to our policies. For more information on this, see Wikipedia's policies on vandalism and limits on acceptable additions. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the sandbox (but beware that the contents of the sandbox are deleted frequently) rather than in articles.

If you still have questions, there is a new contributors' help page, or you can click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia.

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• Help pages
• Tutorial

I hope you find this helpful. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! REDMAN 2019 (talk) 10:12, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Mason Mount. Mattythewhite (talk) 00:47, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Álvaro Morata, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Unsourced content. Mattythewhite (talk) 17:10, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Timo Werner, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chelsea (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:22, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Mattythewhite (talk) 23:54, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Ross Barkley, you may be blocked from editing. Mattythewhite (talk) 21:59, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Édouard Mendy. Mattythewhite (talk) 01:11, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:58, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

When an article has had unsourced content in it for awhile, it's appropriate to add a citation-needed template to the text. When you're adding new content, it is not appropriate to tag it as citation-needed at that time; if you don't have a source, don't add it. Schazjmd (talk) 15:30, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Mason Mount, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 22:08, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Bryce Hall (Internet personality). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. RossButsy (talk) 14:39, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Mason Mount, you may be blocked from editing. Mattythewhite (talk) 22:44, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Miz, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Rock.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 1982, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ashley Walters.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:34, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Saw (2004 film). Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use your sandbox. Thank you. Mike Allen 01:12, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Halloween (franchise) characters, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Halloween II.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Mason Mount, you may be blocked from editing. Mattythewhite (talk) 22:02, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Adam Stanheight.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 16:30, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Adam Stanheight Saw3.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 22:31, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Without Me (Eminem song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Single.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:37, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas, but please remember that Wikipedia isn't a place for walkthroughs, cheats, lists of game content or detailed instructions on how to play a game. For more information please read the video game guideline. Thank you. soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK} 09:05, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Royal Rumble match, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages The Big Show, Big E and James Ellsworth.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Saw (2004 film). Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Mike Allen 15:09, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Scott Tibbs Documentary is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Scott Tibbs Documentary until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Mike Allen 18:09, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

---

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

---

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Yamla (talk) 19:18, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]