User talk:Onorem

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

But if you have any further problems at Talk:Tinga Tinga Tales, please feel invited to ask me to help. BusterD (talk) 22:28, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I am not sure whether you've considered it before, but I figured it may be worthwhile to suggest making your user page a simple redirect to your talk page, as I've seen other users do. Cheers! Remsense诉 17:53, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the suggestion, but I prefer the redlink. It goes back a decade or so to when some users were trying to force people to have a userpage. It might be a bit childish, but I'm OK with that. :) --Onorem (talk) 17:58, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

this,[1] I suspected the edit might be legitimate, but as it was posted by a banned user, I reverted it. So your reverting my revert seems to be valid. :) ←Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots→ 20:33, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't need to bother looking for "reliable" sources at all because I know from experience your crime syndicate does not follow its own rules. You will delete anything that does not facilitate your crimes.

You have now outed yourself as an operate for the KM. If you do not want to get the death penalty I recommend that you STOP YOUR DISRUPTIVE EDIDING NOW.

Or not. The only way to see to it that your dying crime syndicate never can threaten the world again is to eliminate the lot of you from the gene pool. 173.206.200.14 (talk) 16:52, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wow. --Onorem (talk) 16:53, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

Sorry to reply to you so late. Actually, I checked the current reference^[1] and found that the article misquoted its contents. Also, the external links below can prove that the publication information in the text is incorrect. So no more citations need to be added, but text to be fixed, in my opinion. Please let me know what you think. CyanWisp (talk) 04:05, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I am writing to you because your message in my Talk page. The user Svartner has came back (he did the same thing in March [2]) and he is reverting all the articles related to the count of matches between Argentina–Brazil football rivalry, for example Brazil national football team records and statistics and Argentina national football team records and statistics. He was who entered in an edit war, because he doesn´t discuss anything: he first reverts, removing information with sources, and then, enters in an edit war, reverting and reverting. In the Talk Page of the article Argentina–Brazil football rivalry, I put a lot of sources (a few of FIFA, the most important football association in the world), but he insists in his attitude and he is reverting those articles [3]. He doesn´t respect 2 official FIFA´s sources and many others that even put Argentina above by one match (AFA, El Gráfico, TyC Sports, Promiedos), and he only puts 3 sources that say that Brazil is avobe. Only one source gave by him can be considered "serious" (rsssf.com), but the others (eloratings.net and 11v11.com) are a complete "joke". I think that any source can´t be above a single FIFA source... A single FIFA source "kills" any other source, because FIFA is the major world football association... So, the user does not "recognize" 2 FIFA´s sources, one of them with the complete list of matches according to FIFA, and others from AFA (with the complete list of matches), El Gráfico (with the complete list of matches), Promiedos (with the complete list of matches too), TyC Sports. Please, read them:

1) FIFA source number 1. Updated to the latest game (BRA 0 ARG 1, 21/11/2023):[4]. Tied in 42 each.

2) FIFA source number 2. Updated to the 21/11/2012 game. After that match, they played 11 matches, with 4 wins each, 2 ties and one suspended because of the circus made by the brazilian "Ministry of Health" or "Security"... The source shows all the lists of matches... To see the complete list of matches, please click in "Advanced search", and then in "Show all matches":[5]. Adding those games, Argentina is above by one match...

3) Argentine Football Association source number 1 (the major Argentina´s football organization). Updated to the 15/11/2019 game. After that, they played 4 games, with 2 Argentina´s wins, one tie and one suspended match because of the "circus". The source shows all the lists of matches... [6]. Adding those games, Argentina is above by one match.

4) AFA source number 2. Updated to the 16/11/2021 game. After that, they played only 1 match, won by Argentina. The source shows all the lists of matches... [7] Adding this game, Argentina is above by one match.

5) El Gráfico Magazine source (the major football Latin American magazine between 1919 to the middle 2000´s). Updated to the 16/11/2021 game. After that, they played 1 match, won by Argentina... The source shows all the lists of matches... [8]

6) Promiedos.com source. Updated to the latest game (BRA 0 ARG 1, 21/11/2023): [9]

7) TyC Sports source. Updated to the latest game (BRA 0 ARG 1, 21/11/2023). The source shows all the lists of matches... [10]. Argentina is above by one match.

To be "good" I think we should consider the FIFA´s sources. Beacause if we are "evil", we should even say that Argentina leads by one match, as many sources say...

I think it´s crazy and inconceivable, and the behavior of this user is capricious and unacceptable. Can you help me to stop this nonsense? I have alredy made a post in Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents [11]. Thanks! Regards, --Raúl Quintana Tarufetti (talk) 18:16, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You are both edit warring. Look at Wikipedia:Dispute resolution. I have no interest in this topic. --Onorem (talk) 21:47, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Onorem It is difficult to reach an agreement as every time he reverses and removes referenced content claiming to be a "joke". Anyway, I think it's even better for other users to give their opinion, the article in question frequently undergoes disruptive edits. Svartner (talk) 22:39, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

My talk page is not a stage of dispute resolution. Stop edit warring, and figure out what step you need to move on to next. (Here's a hint. Reverting again isn't the next step.) --Onorem (talk) 22:44, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am steven toushin (the last time i did an edit was maybe over 10 years ago, soas of today this is very new to me) and just did a small edit to the personal info section, if i made a mistake please tell me what is was (no need to threaten, also i gave money every year)

steve toushin Stoushin (talk) 20:12, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,I'm Wiki30te.And heck yeah you made a mistake@Onorem and I don't need you snooping got it @wiki30te no thanks!!! Wiki30te (talk) 17:38, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That's great. Go bother someone else...preferably on some other website. I'll continue 'snooping' as long as you continue adding worthless edits. --Onorem (talk) 20:04, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey man, as you can see from the tags I’m on mobile, and you deleted some pretty useful information about how the song was written. So if it’s ok, could you please add in the reference for me? I have the link here that you can watch through the whole documentary and see how the song was made.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/bbcthree/article/895beb53-96b8-40c0-89af-e1c77836b361 MusicalEditor05 (talk) 12:45, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not interested in watching to find the comment...and disagree that it's useful information even if the studio engineer said it. --Onorem (talk) 14:03, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your kind response, could you please define your definition of ‘useful information’? MusicalEditor05 (talk) 14:19, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there once again, I have now added in what you have requested on the ‘Feelin On Yo Booty’ wiki page. If you want to have a read over it again and change anything then feel free. I’m a relatively new user, so bare with me while I get to grips on the rules of wikipedia. MusicalEditor05 (talk) 14:31, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:08, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why was my page deleted? It is a real upcoming movie! WikepediaEdits12 (talk) 17:53, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There's nothing worth writing about it yet. There isn't a reason to have an article. --Onorem (talk) 18:30, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

hold up you also deleted my propose for deletion on Malcolm preserve! are you watching me??? (I am new to Wikipedia so I don't know anything about mods) WikepediaEdits12 (talk) 18:26, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I looked at your other recent edits. I also reverted the mistake you made on the TikTok article in case you care. I'm not a mod...just a user who noticed a new user making questionable edits. --Onorem (talk) 18:30, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You need to get a partner bro, this is not healthy to live your life editing wikipedia 65.181.3.233 (talk) 08:08, 21 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks "bro." I love life advice from strangers. Especially strangers who are responding to warnings for blatantly racist edits. --Onorem (talk) 13:30, 21 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This complaint will serve to confirm that User Never 17 has continued editing responses from contributors who vehemently oppose his point of views, thus creating a hostile and unhealthy environment in the article known as the "Best Selling Artists Listing Directory" and its "Talk Pages". Also including but not limited to, the Elvis Presley "Talk Page". To reiterate, this has created furious and angry feedbacks from more than one contributor who have repeatedly question why have their rebuttals been deleted, edited or relocated/transferred to the page "WP: Not A Forum" by User Never 17. This practice has been systematic and ongoing by this user, to no avail. I am hopeful that you can address this matter to avoid further hostilities from common contributors who have differences of opinions from said User and have been severely edited without their consent by the aforementioned User "Never 17". He has been reprimanded for this type of behavior and yet continues this offending practice. I will await your formal response in correlation to this matter. For further inquiries or concerns, please do not hesitate to reach me. Thank you, very truly yours. Victor0327 (talk) 18:40, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have no idea why you chose to post this to my talk page. That said, it looks like your comments on Talk:Elvis Presley were very correctly moved into the NOTAFORUM section by an administrator. --Onorem (talk) 21:24, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I though you were an administrator who handled such complaints. Obviously you are not. I am new at Wikipedia and do not know how go about addressing complaints of this nature. However you did address a similar problem and complaint with the same user. Moreover if you read my comments you would know that they should not have been moved into a Forum by any administrator, for they were not problematic in any shape or form. That being stated, thank you for your response. Victor0327 (talk) 21:51, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Onorem! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Hatnote, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread. See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:29, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there, You did make a mistake in reverting my edit, I removed a video of President Clinton's tribute to Diana simply because she's not from America and this was a British event. Also If any tribute video should be on that page it should be Tony Blair's not Clinton's. 82.19.40.217 (talk) 16:55, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It doesn't matter which country she's from. This is the reaction of the US president, and it is important. And I'm not from America. The Seal F1 (talk) 16:58, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The US is NOT important. 82.19.40.217 (talk) 18:38, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

82.19.20.217 - I have reverted you again; please stop edit warring. Your original explanation does not make sense - it was not a "British event"; it was of worldwide notability and that Clinton spoke about it shows that to be the case. Your second explanation shows you are simply trolling. Dorsetonian (talk) 18:46, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Er It was a British event, Clinton is NOT British and Diana is NOT American. Never Ever mix the two Countries, the only tribute video that should be on that page is Tony Blair's. 82.19.40.217 (talk) 18:49, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Well, three editors disagree with you. Chances are you are wrong. Dorsetonian (talk) 18:51, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You should use edit summaries to explain your edits. I'd still disagree with you in this case, but it wasn't a "mistake" to revert your unexplained content removal. --Onorem (talk) 21:16, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Onorem About Zombies 4 Disney Posted on their Instagram about the release date so that is why I edited in the Disney Leaked I hope you can put that in correct the date is October 221, 2025. Brayden Thompson 00:32, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I am not sure what you are talking about? I made edits and added footnotes as too why. Johnramias (talk) 22:57, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Read WP:OR. You need to use reliable sources that make the statements you're trying to make. You can't just link to a failed bill and say someone is "known to attempt to introduce new Bills to the West Virginia Senate that Fail to advance past Committee." - That is the definition of original research. You either don't understand how Wikipedia works, or you're doing this on purpose. I'm supposed to assume good faith, so I'll assume you just really don't understand how Wikipedia works. Every one of your edits I've looked at is bad for one reason or another. Your opinions don't belong in article space. --Onorem (talk) 23:02, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You deleted an edit i made about my local school that I edited, I included a significant alumni who is known locally, please reverse the changes — Preceding unsigned comment added by NoahPhillipMair (talk • contribs)

You aren't clever. Make productive edits, go away, or get blocked. I really don't care which you choose, but I'd prefer you decide to make productive edits if that's possible. --Onorem (talk) 17:10, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, This is to bring to your attention that an user by the name @Sigma of the east has been deleting parts of referenced summaries on Dassault Mirage 5 page despite several warnings. I found out you had previously warned him about it a few days back. Please take note. Thank you. AbhijnanGhosh87 (talk) 10:52, 30 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You are involved in a recently filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case#Removing connected user disclosure and stalking article content and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. As threaded discussion is not permitted on most arbitration pages, please ensure that you make all comments in your own section only. Additionally, the guide to arbitration and the Arbitration Committee's procedures may be of use.

Thanks, LateFatherKarma (talk) 18:00, 1 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations. You are now a member of the club of editors who have been named as parties in frivolous or vexatious cases filed with ArbCom. Robert McClenon (talk) 05:33, 2 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

His majesty Charles the third charges and commands you to refrain from interfering. God save the king. Prince David of Ajax (talk) 17:37, 15 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I hope that was a fun 9 minutes of editing. --Onorem (talk) 17:39, 15 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. The thread is Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard#Panties. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!

Meters (talk) 09:40, 9 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

How did you get [12] your edit to save over the "spam/blacklist link" alert? Joyous! Noise! 01:22, 19 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I just hit rollback. I never saw any alert? --Onorem (talk) 01:26, 19 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Huh. I did "revert" instead of rollback, and got a full page of red fonted "there's a link on the page that's on the blacklist omg warning warning!!" I'll try a plain rollback next time. Thx! Joyous! Noise! 01:28, 19 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Joyous!: That does seem strange, and possibly worth bringing up...somewhere. I don't know how it could be abused, but it looks like rollback worked for both myself and User:Bridget...and neither of us are even admins. --Onorem (talk) 14:30, 19 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there! I was wondering if you could block this user ~2025-39589-71. The reason is for edit warring on a lot of NFL pages, such as 2025 Green Bay Packers season and 2025 Indianapolis Colts season by removing the fact that the team who lost were favored to beat whoever defeated them. I'd appreciate it. Thanks! HarryPotter2011 (talk) 15:29, 20 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not an admin...and they were correct, in part at least, about the Packers edit. They weren't favored by 2 and your own link proved it. --Onorem (talk) 16:06, 20 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Alright then. Which administrator can I talk to about this? HarryPotter2011 (talk) 16:08, 20 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Probably none. It's a simple content dispute, not vandalism. Even if the information was accurate, nothing says that it has to be included in the game summary. Try steps in dispute resolution. --Onorem (talk) 16:10, 20 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thanks for correcting me on the betting odds! HarryPotter2011 (talk) 16:19, 20 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Thank you for your kind notice on my message page. One of my edits got changed back by Cluebot NG. What is it? Thank you! ClarityCrusader (talk) 02:33, 22 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Also, there's this editor: [[user talk: Okokmasi], who keeps putting weird things on a soccer player's article, and cluebot didn't stop them. Can you tell them to stop? thank you!!! ClarityCrusader (talk) 02:44, 22 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year!

Onorem,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Volten001 ^☎ 06:04, 1 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Volten001 ^☎ 06:04, 1 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

how about you let the student at the school that is there everyday, inform people on it. And to say that us having a dominant wrestling program is "unsourced" is insane. we have made state 7 years in a row. That's like deleting the fact that the eagles won the superbowl because they didnt link the entire superbowl game video to the page. And a simple google seaech comfirms our bands prestige.Tylergault (talk) 22:45, 6 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

It's not the job of the readers or other editors to do a google search to verify your additions. That's on you to provide. --Onorem (talk) 23:06, 6 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Do you hear yourself, why am I allowed to make my user name Tyler gault when I didn't link my ID? flawed mf logic, I am a blog editor for holmen news paper but no, your sad ass comes in here and ruins my work to make my high school more appealing by adding positive notes Tylergault (talk) 23:10, 6 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

That's not how things work here. I left some links on your talk page if you're interested in learning how they do. Otherwise, I don't need any further comments from you. --Onorem (talk) 23:14, 6 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

damn you really clocked my shit. Seek fulfillment you sub 5 humanoid Tylergault (talk) 23:25, 6 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]