User talk:OneMarkus

OneMarkus because Markus was taken and so was Markuss

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Pinky Bass, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Pinky Bass was changed by OneMarkus (c) (t) replacing entire content with something else on 2007-11-23T22:40:58+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 22:41, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Must have hit the wrong thing at the time Stuff happens I suppose but was not meant to be a vandal. OneMarkus (talk) 01:22, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OneMarcus, I greatly appreciate the comments you made regarding my father's entry under Gerald P. Pulley. I added more under my talk page. Thanks again! DonnPulley (talk) 16:16, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, OneMarkus! Please take a look at Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dates and numbers)#Limit links to other time period related articles - in general, wikilinking years like you did for Meredith Monk doesn't much provide "deeper understanding". Thanks! -- SatyrTN (talk / contribs) 23:20, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Alabama artists requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Gromlakh (talk) 05:34, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I added additional information about Galt so take a look/see if you like and thanks for the support for the article. LOL Oops I forgot I wasn't signed on Again thanks for the support. Artsojourner (talk) 21:02, 9 April 2008 (UTC) 67.101.159.242 (talk) 20:57, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

...because Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and not a directory of hall of fame for contributors to various projects. Imagine Britannica would have an article about the project. Would you expect to see all their names there? No. Why? That's not what encyclopedia should have on the topic. I appreciate all their efforts and congratulate on the success of the project, but Wikipedia is not a place to honor them. See for example, Manhattan Project - a surely notable historical project. Do you see a list of scientist who spend years working on it? No. Why? Same reason, even though Wikipedia has a bunch of articles about these people in Category:Manhattan Project people. Renata (talk) 20:11, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Touche! OneMarkus (talk) 04:21, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for tying the info back to bhamwiki source and also I also saw you put a link from AGNES artists back to the bhamwiki source as well to show every artist regardless of wiki status. Sweet! Artsojourner (talk) 06:37, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey! No problem. OneMarkus (talk) 20:45, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Ohm Phanphiroj, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ohm Phanphiroj. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. CaveatLector ^{Talk Contrib} 19:46, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Melissa Galt, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Glenfarclas (talk) 07:59, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Who is Flowanda and why is she taking off information from pages who are extraordianrily cited even with ISBN I went ack to several of her recent edits before Coffelt and they all are non-sensical. This editor should be censored as she is taking information Wiki deems acceptible and information that is cited and with articles cited. Please help Excirial I would surely be obliged. OneMarkus (talk) 19:01, 29 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You may wish to contact Flowanda instead of me, as she was the person removing the content. The reason for the content removal was left on the article's talk page though, and i presume it was done par WP:BLP. I would urge you to cease reverting edits for now, at least until you contacted him/her about the issue. Flowanda is no new contributer and therefor i presume that there might be a very good reason to remove this content. Excirial ^{(Contact me,Contribs)} 19:10, 29 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I am not the first editor to question your edits, so please do not blame me for your current problems or use me to justify reverting my edits without legitimate discussion. You and other editors have been adding similar content, external links and circular linking to related Wikipedia articles over the past couple of years, so you have no excuse for not knowing Wikipedia policy by now. Plenty of other editors have tried to help or edit these articles.

Again: Most of the artists you're promoting are non-notable, as are the websites, publications and other Wikipedia articles you're using as sources or links. These issues have been raised before by other editors.

Again: Information and sources that don't meet Wikipedia policy need to be removed, and articles that don't meet WP:N need to be deleted. These issues have also been discussed before.

Reverting edits, ignoring advice, pleading ignorance or enlisting new editors won't solve these articles' problems. Please review Biographies of Living Persons, Notability and reliable sourcing, along with WP:COI and WP:SPAM and edit accordingly. Flowanda | Talk 06:24, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

As your reverts and accusations are issues that need to be dealt with, please provide links to the complaint you filed related to this edit summary and your complaint on my talk page. Flowanda | Talk 07:50, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Markus would you look over my last few edits to make sure I spelled and spaced correctly again. Being dyslexic certainly doesn't help and I appreciate any help from you. Artintegrated (talk) 11:44, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

will do no prob. OneMarkus (talk) 18:40, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Which Article were you referring to? — Preceding unsigned comment added by DavinciRed (talk • contribs) 03:00, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article Kahn and Selesnick has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Guoguo12--Talk--  18:06, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Flowanda | Talk 06:52, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Decide what exactly? I just got on wikipedia after a few days and I get this message. OneMarkus (talk) 12:50, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:41, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]