User talk:NegativeMP1

This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.

Hello, I wonder if you still portray me as arrogant. If you have felt bad about my tone in the past, I apologize. My intention was not to intimidate anyone, although I accept I was being dramatic. I felt the need to consult because you left the list of best-selling video games article for months and were not even in touch with its talk page. So I want to ask if the reason was me being rude, or if you simply lost interest, or both. Kazama16 (talk) 06:41, 26 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Truthfully I just haven't gotten the time lately to be too involved in Wikipedia debates or direct page improvements. I haven't wrote anything in a while. I still have the best selling games page on my watchlist and monitor it though. Also, I never portrayed you as outright arrogant as much as I may have questioned how the page was organized. I was probably being harsh with some of my responses then too, as I was just trying to prove a point and likely came off as overwhelming (my Pokemon sales analysis was probably a bit overboard in how I delivered it and I'll fully come clean on that). λ NegativeMP1 16:45, 27 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! In the page Glossary of 2020s slang you reverted my addition of "Chicken Stars" due to it being improperly sourced and I was just wondering how my sources were invalid. Wikitimelee (talk) 23:31, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

By improperly sourced, I meant that the sources used to back up the entry were not of acceptable quality. Typically, Wikipedia requires citations to reliable sources to verify information as well as certify how relevant the information may be. Of the two sources you used, KnowYourMeme is not reliable per WP:KNOWYOURMEME (basically, any site - such as Know Your Meme - is built off of user-generated content without much oversight and is not reliable by default), and the other source Sheknows seems like a strange parenting blog that I can't seem to tell how "reliable" it may be. I'm sorry if my reasoning for reverting initially was too vague. λ NegativeMP1 01:03, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for responding. I was a little iffy on if I should count know your meme but I saw another term (cracked) with SheKnows as the only source it. I'm pretty sure the SheKnows article I sourced got its information from know your meme for the most part so it could just be no good. Wikitimelee (talk) 02:02, 29 October 2025 (UTC) Wikitimelee (talk) 02:02, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again. Did you hear that Battle for Dream Island now has an article? Thanks, 1isall (he/him) (talk | contribs) 19:05, 1 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed I did. Was honestly surprised the article got made that fast. λ NegativeMP1 19:58, 1 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Same here. And a lot of things followed: WP:BFDI is now historical, BFDI-related entries have been removed from the title blacklist, and {{OSC notice}} is being nominated for deletion. I wonder what could happen from here on out. Thanks, 1isall (he/him) (talk | contribs) 20:09, 1 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The 2025 WikiCup has come to an end. Our top scorers, based on the tournament point rankings (which can be seen here), are:

1. BeanieFan11 (submissions) with 1,604 tournament points, will receive the 1st place award.
2. Gog the Mild (submissions) with 1,075 tournament points, will receive the 2nd place award.
3. Arconning (submissions) with 860 tournament points, will receive the 3rd place award.
4. History6042 (submissions) with 804 tournament points
5. Sammi Brie (submissions) with 635 tournament points
6. TheDoctorWho (submissions) with 386 tournament points
7. AirshipJungleman29 (submissions) with 373 tournament points
8. Thebiguglyalien (submissions) with 362 tournament points

Our high scorers in the final round were:

• BeanieFan11 (submissions) with 1,035 round points, mostly from 19 good articles and 21 did you know articles about athletes
• vigilantcosmicpenguin (submissions) with 819 round points, mostly from 13 good articles and 11 did you know articles about a wide range of topics from abortion topics to African cities
• TheNuggeteer (submissions) with 508 round points from 9 good articles, 4 good topic articles and 6 did you know articles mainly about Philippines topics, along with 19 good article reviews

The final round was very productive, and contestants had 2 featured articles, 4 featured lists, 106 good articles, 5 good topic articles, 178 article reviews, 76 did you know articles, and 9 in the news articles. Altogether, Wikipedia has benefited greatly from the activities of WikiCup competitors all through the contest. Well done everyone!

The top eight scorers will receive awards shortly. The following special awards will be made, based on high performance in particular areas of content creation. These prizes are awarded to the competitor who scored the highest in any particular field during the competition.

• Gog the Mild (submissions) wins the featured article prize, with 12 featured articles total, and the featured topic prize, with 9 featured topic articles in total
• Hey man im josh (submissions) wins the featured list prize, with 10 featured lists total
• AirshipJungleman29 (submissions) wins the featured picture prize, submitting the only featured picture in the entire contest during round 3
• History6042 (submissions) wins the featured content reviewer prize, with 127 featured content reviews. He will also share the ITN prize, with 20 in the news articles in total.
• BeanieFan11 (submissions) wins the good article prize, with 100 good articles total, and the DYK prize, with 147 did you know articles in total. He will also share the ITN prize, with 20 in the news articles in total.
• TheDoctorWho (submissions) wins the good topic prize, with 16 good topic entries in total
• Arconning (submissions) wins the good article reviewer prize, with 68 good article reviews in total

A special mention also goes to these users who scored the highest in a particular category in a single round:

• Sammi Brie (submissions), with 27 good articles in round 3, and 45 good article reviews in round 1
• Tails Wx (submissions), with 10 in the news articles in round 3

Next year's competition will begin on 1 January. You are invited to sign up to participate. The WikiCup is open to all Wikipedians, both novices and experienced editors, and we hope to see you all in the 2026 competition. Until then, it only remains to once again congratulate our worthy winners, and thank all participants for their involvement!

On behalf of the judges, Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs · email), Epicgenius (talk · contribs · email), Frostly (talk · contribs · email), Guerillero (talk · contribs · email) and Lee Vilenski (talk · contribs · email):

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:24, 1 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send.

Thanks for uploading File:Taylor Swift – The Life of a Showgirl (album cover).png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:47, 7 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I need some clarification. I don't quite understand your reasoning why The Five of Us Are Dying and Knives / Sorrow cannot be included n the List of songs recorded by MCR

The Five of Us Are Dying is considered a rough mix, just like their song "Emily (Rough Mix)" – a song surprisingly present n the list. And regarding, Knives / Sorrow as a demo, All the Angels and Party at the End of the World are considered demos too. If rough mixes and demos cannot be included there, then we must remove Emily, All the Angels, and Party at the End of the World as well. Looking forward to your response. EvanJeffCordova (talk) 05:59, 14 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, sorry for the confusion. My reasoning is that I view The Five of Us Are Dying and Knives/Sorrows are more or less just early versions of WTTBP and Our Lady of Sorrows, respectively. They were even advertised as such. I don't think they warrant being considered separate songs—which giving it a separate entry would imply—for that reason. It's not like All The Angels or Emily which are distinct songs in their own right, even if left unfinished and sporting very major differences. It's the same reason why the two demo versions of House of Wolves and the demo of Disenchanted aren't listed, and probably shouldn't be, even if fundamentally different songs. Although maybe leeway could be given to The Five of Us Are Dying due to how different it is and it was technically released as a promotional single on streaming services. λ NegativeMP1 06:05, 14 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:58, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello NegativeMP1:

WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long Backlog Drive in December!
The goal of this drive is to reduce the backlog of unreviewed drafts to less than half a month of outstanding reviews from the current 2+ months. Bonus points will be given for reviewing drafts that have been waiting more than 30 days. The drive is running from 1 December 2025 through 31 December 2025.

You may find Category:AfC pending submissions by age or other categories and sorting helpful.

Barnstars will be given out as awards at the end of the drive.
There is a backlog of over 3000 pages, so start reviewing drafts. We're looking forward to your help! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:07, 23 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list or alternatively to opt-out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery to your user talk page.

Hello NegativeMP1: I, the creator of the "Jailbreak (Roblox)" article noticed that you have nominated the article for deletion because it does not align with Wikipedia's guidelines, specifically for Notability and Unreliable sources. I want to know what could happen to the article and what could be done for it to be more "efficient" and follow the policies of the English Wikipedia. If it is deleted, merged or redirected as the majority then ignore this. rave (talk) 15:10, 23 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I've had a hectic week so I might give better feedback later but right now the bottom line is just notability. Notability isn't the only factor behind what can or can't get an article, but it's generally the main one. Jailbreak simply just isn't notable. You need multiple reliable sources that are dedicated to Jailbreak specifically (not the creator, but the game). For video games this is typically reviews or coverage that covers multiple aspects of a game (gameplay, reception, etc). Strong emphasis on the Reception part, which is generally how people determine the notability of a video game. A well sourced and structured reception section is almost always needed. λ NegativeMP1 17:19, 23 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

alr thanks! :) have a good day rave (talk) 17:20, 23 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article The Black Parade Is Dead! is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of LEvalyn -- LEvalyn (talk) 01:27, 24 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, NegativeMP1! Sorry for disturbing you since you're busy. I want to have a question about the reliability of the 4 sources for Mad Tracks. Specifically, SpeedManiacs, GameSwelt, DemoNews and ZockOn. They do cover some of the news and preview reviews about the game. I don't know which one might be an unreliable source for the Mad Tracks article; can you help?

I have some concerns with the reliability of the ZockOn; they covered a preview of Mad Tracks in 2005, though AI Overview claims that it's unreliable, judging by the Contact Hosting page of the website and the latter's quote: Do you have a fan page for a current or upcoming title?' Looking for a strong partner who will provide you with the technology you need? You've come to the right place! (Translated from German: Ihr habt eine Fanseite zu einem aktuellen oder noch erscheinenden Titel? Ihr sucht einen starken Partner, der euch die nötige Technik zur Verfügung stellt? Dann seid ihr bei uns genau richtig!)

So, which ones are reliable and which aren't?

Thanks! SI Moon. SI Moon Grubisz440 (talk) 18:40, 26 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The best way to determine the reliability of these sources is to see if they have any reliable qualities. For video games this generally goes to the follow questions: does the source have an editorial policy? Are the writers experienced in the field of writing or video game industry as a whole, and also credited accordingly? Is the content high quality and doesn't frequently publish low quality content aka churnalism?

For me it seems like the following: SpeedManiacs seems like a fan site that couldn't be considered high quality. GamesWelt is listed as reliable at WP:VG/S, so that ones fine. I don't see any reliable qualities in DemoNews, so I'm not sure. And ZockOn seems like a user-generated forum, which are inherently unreliable. λ NegativeMP1 04:00, 27 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

So, in conclusion for all of these sources and their status of their reliability, some of them can be included in WP:VG/S.

• GameSwelt, (Completely Reliable.)
• DemoNews (? (reliability of it), this may change in future.)
• SpeedManiacs (fan site, Completely unreliable, obviously and with no question.)
• ZockOn. (user-generated forum, Completely unreliable.)

The additional sources may come soon! And also, thank you!! SI Moon Grubisz440 (talk) 21:33, 27 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article The Black Parade Is Dead! has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of LEvalyn -- LEvalyn (talk) 04:43, 28 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The category description says "Works that were created in whole or part using artificial intelligence tools." so I guess the game counts for something. I honestly don't mind if my edit got reverted though. Blake Gripling (talk) 08:20, 2 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Honestly, yeah. It's just a category so it really doesn't matter. Editorial discretion just kinda kicked in for me on that part because the game only has AI-generated cosmetics as far as I'm aware (and those are fully optional). I can see how the category fits or an argument for it not fitting. It honestly doesn't matter. Thanks for showing me what the category description is though, I didn't bother to check that initially (I originally thought that it meant stuff entirely generated by AI). λ NegativeMP1 08:27, 2 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article The Paper Kingdom has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of KmartEmployeeTor -- KmartEmployeeTor (talk) 11:02, 11 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I worked hard on that and there is a third film in development Meowyme0407 (talk) 20:48, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for ruining my hard work. Meowyme0407 (talk) 20:54, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

My edit summary explains why. There is no official announcement yet and right now it is entirely based on speculation without any official, substantive info. I understand that you worked on that section but please wait until some actual information comes out about the film besides Lillard's three-picture deal and a Steam community post that didn't even verify the idea of the third film being based on the third game (as far as I could tell). λ NegativeMP1 20:57, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Well I guess it was a lie that there was going to be a third film I didn't know the second film was that bad that there couldn't be another movie... Meowyme0407 (talk) 21:04, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm never going to edit anymore pages again. Meowyme0407 (talk) 21:08, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I never said that the third film isn't going to happen. I'm saying that the information shouldn't be added to the article on the second film until an official statement comes out about its development. λ NegativeMP1 21:13, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I won't edit FNAF anymore. Meowyme0407 (talk) 22:15, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for letting me know. I apologize for that. Iacowriter (talk) 23:35, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It's fine, I can definitely see how it's something one would infer based on previous knowledge of the series. Just unclear it's status in the film continuity yet. λ NegativeMP1 00:10, 21 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

"In January 2023, in an interview on the podcast WeeklyMTG, Lillard revealed that he signed a three-picture deal with the studios" It needs to be removed since you said it wasn't factual or official and there won't be sequels. Meowyme0407 (talk) 01:45, 19 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No, because that's in the context of any sort of sequel happening, and a second film already happened. So the inclusion there is fine as the film already released. It's just not appropriate to cite that as the only source for a third film happening when there is absolutely nothing else about it.

Also, please stop with the whole "the second film was so bad that there won't be a third one". That's not at all what I have been getting at. Competence is required. λ NegativeMP1 02:06, 19 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry I was acting threating to you and I didn't mean to troll and I'm taking a break from Wikipedia, and you do an amazing job and sorry for my harassment. Meowyme0407 (talk) 03:23, 19 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there. I wanted to let you know that I've been making improvements to ...And Justice for All, including expansions on reception and the mention of fan edits that include bass such as ...And Justice for Jason. I think the comp section is in good shape, really the only thing that might be able to be expanded on is recording, but I'd need to look at other sources for that. Anyways, I thought you'd be interested :-) – zmbro _{(talk) (cont)} 23:56, 20 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Zmbro: it's definitely looking a lot better than a few months ago! It's probably maintained enough at this point where I don't think anyone would bring up issues with the article in a hypothetical GTC. Assuming a topic on Metallica albums is still the goal (I haven't been particularly motivated to work on large article rewrites recently so I'm yet to make any major progress on Hardwired and 72 Seasons like I said I would back then). λ NegativeMP1 00:13, 21 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I haven't either. Been gaming a lot in my spare time, cleaning up my trophy list. I still intend on doing St. Anger one of these days though, as that needs a major rewrite. I've been into Justice lately (mainly bass mixes on Youtube) and I can't game at the moment so I thought I'd take a gander at that. One day we'll get there! – zmbro _{(talk) (cont)} 00:24, 21 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Justice was always my personal favorite album from them, probably my favorite album overall despite the mixing. One long term goal I hope to achieve at some point is getting "One" to GA, but that's gonna be a monumental task and require a ton of sourcing I can't easily access right now.

I think I probably have more motivation and long term goals for improving the articles on Metallica songs rather than the albums. Because, good lord, almost every article on a Metallica song is garbage, and there's a TON of songs that are almost certainly notable and yet somehow don't have articles. But one thing at a time... λ NegativeMP1 01:15, 21 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, Springsteen stuff is the same way. His song articles are in such bad shape, and don't get me started on his tour articles. Unfortunately, there's only so much one person can do... – zmbro _{(talk) (cont)} 02:00, 21 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No hard feelings, I think I actually have a better idea of what to do with this source Lofi Gurl (talk) 03:50, 22 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for understanding at least, I was just hoping I wasn't coming off as harsh since I've reverted a few of these edits at this point. I'd imagine that if Gerard Way's article had some sort of "Impact" section (which it probably could...? I mean it's Gerard Way) then the list could probably be placed there somewhere, but for the lead, I don't think it's fully acceptable.

Same for the list you added to Panic! at the Disco, which I also reverted an edit at and will explain further here. The list from Consequence would be fine to include if a Legacy section actually existed in the band's article, which one definitely could. But IMO this is like an "all or nothing" approach. I'd rather not have a legacy section characterized by one list, feels WP:UNDUE and unrepresentative of the band's legacy when there's most definitely more than just that one list, y'know? λ NegativeMP1 03:54, 22 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Just noticed you put the source in the Artistry section instead [1]. For now at least, that's probably fine. λ NegativeMP1 03:55, 22 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I get where you're coming from about the Impact/Legacy section. Makes sense to me. I'm glad you're happy with my addition to the Artistry section. Lofi Gurl (talk) 04:03, 22 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2026!

Hello NegativeMP1, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2026. Happy editing, Vacant0 (talk • contribs) 17:13, 24 December 2025 (UTC)[reply] Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

Vacant0 (talk • contribs) 17:13, 24 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas! λ NegativeMP1 19:14, 24 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year and Happy New WikiCup! The 2026 competition has just begun and all article creators, expanders, improvers and reviewers are welcome to take part. Even if you are a novice editor, we hope the WikiCup will give you a chance to improve your editing skills as you go. If you have already signed up, your submissions page can be found here. If you have not yet signed up, you can add your name here, and a bot will set up your submissions page within one day, ready for you to take part. Any questions on the scoring, rules or anything else should be directed to one of the judges, or posted to the WikiCup talk page.

For the 2026 WikiCup, the highest-ranking contestants will receive tournament points at the end of each round, and final rankings are decided by the number of tournament points each contestant has. This is the same scoring system that we had last year. If you're busy and can't sign up in January, don't worry: Signups are open throughout the year. To make things fairer for latecomers, the lowest-scoring contestants are no longer eliminated at the end of each round.

The first round will end on 26 February. The judges for the WikiCup this year are: Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs · email), Epicgenius (talk · contribs · email), Frostly (talk · contribs · email), Guerillero (talk · contribs · email) and Lee Vilenski (talk · contribs · email). Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 1 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2027!

Hello NegativeMP1, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2027. Happy editing, Iostn (talk) 18:22, 1 January 2026 (UTC)[reply] Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

Iostn (talk) 18:22, 1 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year! (Also I think you meant to put 2026 and not 2027...) λ NegativeMP1 18:24, 1 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I think the template auto-replaced the year as that Iostn (talk) 18:36, 1 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough. 2026 went by so fast... λ NegativeMP1 18:50, 1 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article The Black Parade/Living with Ghosts is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of RedShellMomentum -- RedShellMomentum (talk) 02:25, 3 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article The Black Parade/Living with Ghosts has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of RedShellMomentum -- RedShellMomentum (talk) 02:02, 7 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution.

Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!

Andrzejbanas (talk) 00:48, 11 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Feel free to read my story at User:Interstellarity/My Story and join in for some Wikipedia-related fun. I hope you like it. Interstellarity (talk) 22:34, 14 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Song of Healing (Majora's Mask).png. However, there is a concern that the use of the file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. Details of this problem, and which specific criteria that the film may not meet, can be obtained by going to the file description page. If you feel that this image does meet those criteria, please place a note on the file description or talk page explaining why. Do not remove the {{di-fails NFCC}} tag itself.

An administrator will review this file within a few days, and having considered the opinions placed on the file page, may delete it in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion or remove the tag entirely. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Ирука¹³ 10:43, 15 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Song of Healing (Majora's Mask).png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. — Ирука¹³ 06:17, 16 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

		The My Chemical Romance Barnstar
		For your contributions to MCR-related articles. RedShellMomentum 03:46, 23 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much!!! λ NegativeMP1 05:25, 23 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article Great Plateau is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of JuniperChill -- JuniperChill (talk) 22:46, 23 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Song of Healing at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Tbhotch^™ (CC BY-SA 4.0) 08:12, 24 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article Song of Healing is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Vacant0 -- Vacant0 (talk) 12:05, 24 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article Great Plateau has been placed on hold, as the article needs some changes. See the review page for more information. If these are addressed within 7 days, the nomination will pass; otherwise, it may fail. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of JuniperChill -- JuniperChill (talk) 19:26, 29 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article Great Plateau has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of JuniperChill -- JuniperChill (talk) 00:03, 1 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article Conventional Weapons is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of RedShellMomentum -- RedShellMomentum (talk) 01:45, 1 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Good article nominations | February 2026 Backlog Drive
February 2026 Backlog Drive: On 1 February, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number and age of articles reviewed. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talk page.
You're receiving this message because you have conducted a good article review in the past year or participated in the previous backlog drive.

-- MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:00, 1 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article Conventional Weapons has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of RedShellMomentum -- RedShellMomentum (talk) 21:04, 1 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article To Live Is to Die has been placed on hold, as the article needs some changes. See the review page for more information. If these are addressed within 7 days, the nomination will pass; otherwise, it may fail. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of MarioSoulTruthFan -- MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 01:04, 2 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article To Live Is to Die has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of MarioSoulTruthFan -- MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 21:45, 2 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

At the stage it's at, I don't think I have any useful feedback, but I wanted to wish you luck on Foundations. I'll be watching it, and if you need an emergency reviewer ping me. May the nomination stand above the foundations of decay. Hot take, it's one of their best once it gets going. mftp dan ^oops 13:34, 6 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the kind words! I'll let you know if an emergency review is needed, but I'm hoping that it goes smoothly. λ NegativeMP1 17:23, 6 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article Boy Division / Tomorrow's Money is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Arconning -- Arconning (talk) 14:37, 13 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! NegativeMP1, sorry for disturbing you now. I'm aware that you're busy, but I want to give some of the questions for the article to improve its quality and potentially be reviewed and nominated for Good Article (GA) of Baldi's Basics (though I'm aware and certain that the current version is okay).

The first thing I want to mention is reliable sources. While most of them are fine, I'm sure that Rely on Horror and Gaming Trend are unreliable sources; they can be replaced with reliable sources with no issues. Though I'm not sure if Konbini (website) [fr] is a reliable source and if it may stay or isn't reliable and should be removed from the article (which I'm sure it will be the latter). I'm also not sure do interviews of Micah McGonigal from YouTube can be a reliable source for the game's development. Also, there's enough information for "Critical Reception" to be okay? Plus, the article could be protected from unregistered users from vandalism.

Thanks! SI Moon Grubisz440 (talk) 21:14, 13 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

As of the last time I've checked the article, if you think that it's been gone through enough, it's likely fine for GA. I can respond to a few of your more specific questions or give more honest feedback later. But to answer one question up front, yes, you can cite interviews for information on the games development even from YouTubers as long as you only cite Mystman's words. λ NegativeMP1 12:52, 14 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

As of now, I've removed all unreliable sources, and the Micah McGonigal interview from YouTube is on the way (I'll be using a timestamp note for it, which might be okay). Though still, I'm not sure about the reliability of Konbini (website) [fr], and I'm still not sure if there's enough information and coverage for "Critical Reception" to be okay. SI Moon Grubisz440 (talk) 19:30, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Well, the wait for an answer will take longer than I may expect. SI Moon Grubisz440 (talk) 21:13, 16 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, there's other editing I've been trying to do with the time I have.

If you're uncertain about Konbini's reliability, you can present it to WP:VG/S. Hopefully someone would give their feedback there regarding if its reliable or not. λ NegativeMP1 02:02, 17 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

A YouTube source has been added to Baldi's article, but there's no one who wants to prove the reliability of the Konbini website (maybe I should be patient?). SI Moon Grubisz440 (talk) 14:52, 19 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

You can make your own judgment on the source's reliability, you'd just have to defend its reliability if it ever comes up. λ NegativeMP1 19:02, 19 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

If I'm being asked, the Konbini article is okay, though lack of experience in the field of verifying the reliability of the sources may cause some problems in the future. Especially when rarely or no one responds on the reliability of a source, like this one.

Aside from that, are there more problems that you notice in the article at the moment?

Thanks! SI Moon Grubisz440 (talk) 20:58, 20 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article Dehya is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Kline -- Kline (talk) 18:05, 14 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article Boy Division / Tomorrow's Money has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Arconning -- Arconning (talk) 15:05, 16 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article The World Is Ugly / The Light Behind Your Eyes is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Leafy46 -- Leafy46 (talk) 15:34, 17 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article Dehya has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Kline -- Kline (talk) 22:07, 17 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Precious

Two years!

Congratulations! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:00, 21 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! λ NegativeMP1 19:10, 22 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

On 22 February 2026, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Song of Healing, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the "Song of Healing", an emotional song from The Legend of Zelda, is an inversion of a different, more jaunty Zelda song? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Song of Healing. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Song of Healing), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to nominate it.

HurricaneZeta^C 00:02, 22 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article The World Is Ugly / The Light Behind Your Eyes has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Leafy46 -- Leafy46 (talk) 00:05, 22 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

	Majora's Mask Barnstar
	Great job creating the article Song of Healing from the The Legend of Zelda: Majora's Mask game! I grant you this barnstar for your efforts in this series. Morogris (✉ • ✎) 18:59, 22 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much!! λ NegativeMP1 19:09, 22 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! This is Marcuslk07. I saw that you removed my edit of adding Hello Mario and It's Me Mario Stop Motion Shorts from Kevin Afghani's filmography. I only added it there because i saw that Mario Tennis Fever had "Citetion needed" and had no source. And also, Mario Tennis Fever also lists Baby Wario and Baby Waluigi being voiced by Kevin but Kevin hasn't confirmed he is voicing Baby Wario and Baby Waluigi Marcuslk07 (talk) 17:20, 23 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted the edit because our sourcing standards for biographies on living people is quite higher, and most unsourced material should be removed. Even a primary source (e.g. to the game credits) would be acceptable. Mario Tennis Fever probably shouldn't be there either unless it can meet that standard. Sorry if there was any confusion. λ NegativeMP1 17:24, 23 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

It's okay, don't worry. I usually never do edits without sources but i thought sense Mario Tennis Fever didn't have a source listed and no one had removed it, then i thought maybe Hello Mario and It's Me Mario Stop Motion Shorts could be added. I will admit that i did see Kevin Afghani's name in the credits of Mario Tennis Fever but that was from a YouTube video and i was told by a user here on Wikipedia that YouTube was an unreliable source. Marcuslk07 (talk) 17:35, 23 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

The first round of the 2026 WikiCup ended on 26 February. As some of you may have noticed, good article nomination reviews now receive 10 points, an increase from 5 points in the previous year, as per a consensus at WT:CUP. This point increase has been retroactively applied to all good article reviews for which competitors have claimed points in this round. Peer reviews, which continue to be worth 5 points, are now listed in the same section as featured article candidate reviews, rather than with good article reviews. Everyone who competed in round 1 will advance to round 2 unless they have withdrawn or been banned. No other changes to the round-point system have been made for this year.

Round 1 was competitive. Three contestants scored more than 1,000 round points, and the top 16 contestants all scored more than 300 round points. The following competitors scored more than 800 round points:

• Bgsu98 (submissions) with 1,467 round points, largely gained from 1 featured article, 5 featured lists, 15 good articles, and 42 FAC and GAN reviews;
• Olliefant (submissions) with 1,246 round points, largely from 4 featured lists, 9 good articles, 2 featured topic articles, 4 did you know articles, and 75 FAC and GAN reviews;
• Generalissima (submissions) with 1,095 round points, largely from 3 featured articles, 6 good articles, and 5 did you know articles;
• MCE89 (submissions) with 848 round points, largely from 1 featured article, 8 good articles, 1 did you know article, and 32 FAC and GAN reviews; and
• Rollinginhisgrave (submissions) with 838 round points, largely from 1 featured article, 8 good articles, 1 did you know article, and 14 FAC, GAN, and peer reviews.

The full scores for round 1 can be seen here. During this round, contestants have claimed 7 featured articles, 16 featured lists, 2 featured-topic articles, 168 good articles, 13 good-topic articles and more than 50 Did You Know articles. In addition, competitors have worked on 14 In the News articles, and they have conducted nearly 700 reviews. The tournament points table will be updated within the next few days.

Remember that any content promoted after 26 February but before the start of Round 2 can be claimed in Round 2. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, feel free to review one of the nominations listed on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:57, 27 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/712300985166594128/1477142510882263090/image.png?ex=69a3afaa&is=69a25e2a&hm=521157d3172acd70239715ec78011f4cf80fbccaf0d9aaaca8fd7ac81935f8c8& Alasteon (talk) 03:17, 28 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think there was anything suggesting you were the one that added the month? λ NegativeMP1 05:54, 28 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

wrd to my mother i dont remember bc i will never put some bs like that istg Alasteon (talk) 09:05, 28 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations, NegativeMP1! The article you nominated, The Foundations of Decay, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best articles on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.

This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main Page as Today's featured article. Keep up the great work! Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) via FACBot (talk) 23:06, 28 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations on promoting the first-ever My Chemical Romance article to FA status! Wishing you all the best from North Carolina 🙂 Johnson524 03:48, 2 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much! Here's to hoping that it won't be the only and/or the last! λ NegativeMP1 05:16, 2 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations on this!! I just saw it had been promoted. By the way, I don't think I feel the same about it, but I do see where your perspective is on whether emo is explicit, so I won't dispute it. (If it's two existing genres smashed together specifically in a way like that one, I personally don't interpret genres that are made up to be foul on that, but that's a personal view and I see why someone might think differently.) mftp dan ^oops 17:13, 11 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

On 1 March 2026, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Damage, Inc. (video game), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that an unreleased video game themed around Metallica was described as "Twisted Metal meets Grand Theft Auto"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Damage, Inc. (video game). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Damage, Inc. (video game)), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to nominate it.

HurricaneZeta^C 00:02, 1 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

	The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar
	The Barnstar is awarded to NegativeMP1 for accumulating at least 7 points during the February 2026 GAN Backlog drive. Congratulations, and I hope to see you again soon! Crystalite13 (talk) 16:19, 3 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I see you've contributed to MCR and MCR-related musicians in the past. I found out about the cellist, Clarice Jensen, by virtue of MCR including her on last year's tour. I wrote up an article on her but some deemed it not noteworthy enough (though that seemed odd given her discography and film scoring credentials). I'm new to Wikipedia so trying to learn more. Thanks. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Clarice_Jensen September cohen (talk) 21:10, 20 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@September cohen: I've looked into whether Jensen was notable or not in the past. I've actually been hoping to look into many of the current MCR touring musicians; I already made the article for Kayleigh Goldsworthy.

Back to Jensen, I'm kinda 50/50 on if she's notable? I've got some sources for her at User:NegativeMP1/Clarice Jensen. They definitely help, it's coverage of her or her work, but I'm not fully sure if it's enough for WP:NMUSICIAN to be met. You can add them and see if they help with the AfC process. I hope this helps; let me know if you have any further questions. λ NegativeMP1 23:50, 20 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I added the AltPress MCR tour article link. I already had a link to a KQED article citing Jensen on the Taylor Swift album (which was also validated by your Fader article). I think she qualifies based on #1 (subject of multiple, non-trivial published works) if her inclusion on multiple NPR 'Best of' lists and Pitchfork 'Best of' count as non-trivial (which I think they should). I think she also qualifies based on #5 as her last three albums were released on FatCat Records (a decades old label with many notable musicians/acts associated). And then, perhaps, qualified based on #1 in composers if one would conclude that scoring four films that debuted at Tribeca / Tribeca / Sundance and IDFA counts as 'notable compositions' (since one of her scores won an Ariel Award, seems like it would clear the notability threshold. September cohen (talk) 03:04, 21 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, again! I've recently made a nomination for Slender: the Eight Pages. Can you review the article and add additional feedback on what to change in the article? I co-nominate it with User:1timeuse75, as he and I met the criteria of top 5 contributors. SI Moon Grubisz440 (talk) 10:34, 21 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm sorry but I'm not particularly interested in reviewing that article again, sorry. Great to see that y'all are working on it more after it was originally quickfailed, though. λ NegativeMP1 19:05, 21 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! SI Moon Grubisz440 (talk) 21:16, 21 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! quite sorry to bother you, but i saw that in WP:VG Talk you said that Fortnite Ballistic is being shut down in april? How so? Again, quite sorry to interrupt, but as a player of the gamemode i would like to know where you got this information. Thelarper (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 02:09, 26 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

The exact tweet announcement can be found in the Fortnite Ballistic article itself, but Epic announced they're shutting down Ballistic, Rocket Racing, and the Battle Stage of Fortnite Festival alongside the recent layoffs. Sucks to see as a fan of Festival and Rocket Racing, but it is what it is. λ NegativeMP1 06:38, 26 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	Thank you for your Angry Birds Go! GA review! Your suggestions have helped improve the article a ton! Signed, SleepyRedHair. (talk - contribs) 16:48, 27 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! λ NegativeMP1 17:05, 27 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, NegativeMP1. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Halo Remake, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:07, 27 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article Song of Healing has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Please also consider reviewing somebody else's nomination to help keep the backlog down. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Vacant0 -- Vacant0 (talk) 16:06, 30 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:The Black Parade 2026 Tour Poster.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 07:47, 1 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I have a question about the reliability of the source. I'm doing the Baldi's Basics article, and I found the Pixel (magazine) source: https://www.pixel-magazin.de/ and https://web.archive.org/web/20230830062338/https://www.pixel-magazin.de/basically-games-veroeffentlicht-baldis-basics-classic/

Is the German version a reliable source, or is it completely different and is not reliable? (I'm aware that the Polish Pixel (Magazine) has an online version, despite being a monthly magazine). SI Moon Grubisz440 (talk) 08:26, 2 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

On 2 April 2026, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Wikigacha, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that a Japanese developer turned Wikipedia into a card-collecting gacha game? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Wikigacha. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Wikigacha), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to nominate it.

HurricaneZeta^C 12:15, 2 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

		Hook update
		Your hook reached 9,498 views (791.5 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of April 2026 – nice work!

GalliumBot (talk • contribs) (he/it) 03:29, 3 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed my recent edits were reverted. Most changes were minor MOS and neutrality fixes (e.g., removing "romantic", "anticipation", and "predominantly", and correcting "US" to "U.S.").Regarding tense, MOS generally uses present tense for works of fiction, including video games, and this is consistent with other Grand Theft Auto articles (e.g., GTA V). However, I understand there may be different views for unreleased titles, so I'm happy to discuss or find a consistent approach. Would it be possible to restore the rest? Umais Bin Sajjad (talk) 18:28, 3 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Most of the edits were fine, and you can obviously re-implement them anyways, but it was the larger stuff that I find mildly questionable. For example, I don't really see how writing out "Depicts a satirical version of" is preferred over just "parodies", unless we assume people don't know what the word "parody" means. As for the tense, works of fictions that have not come out yet are treated as "upcoming" and with the note that they're supposed to be something, but it isn't 100% for sure. The game actually existing is a future event. The wording changes aren't really significant; I do think that "U.S." is the preferred writing in British English, which the article uses, but it's not something to make a large deal over. λ NegativeMP1 18:34, 3 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the response. Just to clarify:

- "romantic" and "anticipation" add interpretation/promotional tone

- "U.S." is the standard form per MOS. "statewide" as well

On tense, WP:MOS generally uses present tense for works of fiction but I understand there may be different views for unreleased titles. Happy to leave "parodies" as-is. Umais Bin Sajjad (talk) 18:44, 3 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see how "romantic" and "anticipation" are interpretive or promotional, and both are supported by references. "US" is the standard form per MOS:US. – Rhain ☔ (he/him) 20:54, 3 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article Long Live The Black Parade is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pokelego999 -- Pokelego999 (talk) 05:04, 4 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hey @NegativeMP1, I hope you're doing well! I was just wondering if you would be able/willing to be the reviewer for a nomination I recently opened at My Nintendo Picross: The Legend of Zelda: Twilight Princess. It's a short article and the subject is rather niche as a game, and as I've significantly improved on GANs since your review of Miiverse in June last year, I think it won't have any major structural issues. Let me know if you're willing to take the review on! PresentlySuraye3 (talk) 02:23, 8 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I don't really have the drive or time right now to take on additional reviews beyond what I've already elected to do, sorry. λ NegativeMP1 05:14, 9 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

No worries. If at any point your schedule clears up and the review is still open, feel free to take it on and if you do, I look forward to the review. Thanks! PresentlySuraye3 (talk) 02:37, 10 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

That's my bad, I just saw post-release, and I just thought it was post-game update. I will just move it under a brand-new sub header of Release. RCPolygons (talk) 09:12, 8 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Makes sense. λ NegativeMP1 05:13, 9 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Why have you reverted my edit on SkyDoesMinecraft. You have reintroduced an incorrect value. The current value rounded to two decimal places is 3.85 billion. Termynaytor (talk) 12:31, 11 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

You reverting the edit back to one where the date was older made it appear to me that you reintroduced an outdated value. I see now that your edit was correct, save the date problem. Apologies. λ NegativeMP1 17:43, 11 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article Long Live The Black Parade has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Please also consider reviewing somebody else's nomination to help keep the backlog down. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pokelego999 -- Pokelego999 (talk) 01:44, 13 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Just want to ask where that reference is on the page for the October 2024 teaser. Might be worth placing it right after that sentence aswell. Natxeulaa (talk) 03:05, 18 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

The info is sourced in the first paragraph of the "Release" section. And, adding the citation up there is not needed per WP:LEADCITE. λ NegativeMP1 08:32, 18 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article I Don't Love You is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of RedShellMomentum -- RedShellMomentum (talk) 19:02, 20 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]