User talk:MusicalKnight

This is a Wikipedia user talk page. This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original talk page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:MusicalKnight.

Please place new discussions at the bottom of the talk page.

This is MusicalKnight's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed Article policies Neutral point of view No original research Verifiability

Thank you MusicalKnight for making the edit for me! That was very nice of you. Regards, Wilton. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.28.213.150 (talk) 19:32, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No problem! Hope you enjoy being on Wikipedia! Don't forget to sign messages with 4 tildes (~), that is standard Wikipedia practice. Anyway, I am glad to help people out when they need it! MusicalKnight (talk) 19:37, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi MusicalKnight, I would just like to thank you for your continued service on this site, and to ask for your pardon of me in regards to the recent vandalism. My IP isn't shared, but my laptop is, with a mate that I once met a night after studies. A nice guy, but bothersome when I observe what he does on my system. I've spoken to him, and so the vandalism should not be expected anymore. All the best, -K 105.112.98.21 (talk) 20:38, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. –Miles Edgeworth ^Talk 23:06, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There are few secondary sources available anywhere and there is no official acknowledgement of its existence anymore. — Preceding unsigned comment added by QuarioQuario54321 (talk • contribs) 22:46, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

QuarioQuario54321, are these sources from valid, reliable news websites? Fansites are not considered to be reliable sources of information. I haven't been able to find any news sources surrounding Skyscrapersim, trust me I looked. If there aren't any official acknowledgements of it's existence, why should we keep it on Wikipedia? Wikipedia is supposed to be a professional calibre project, and unsourced articles do not belong on Wikipedia if they can't be sourced appropriately. If you can find additional sources and expand the article, please do so! I was an active member of that community at one point, and I was shocked when development suddenly stopped. However, in the article's current state, it almost appears like a fansite article (like something you'd see on a Wikia site). There is also considerable amounts of incorrect information, such as it now being developed by "Chicco Apple", who I've never heard of even once. The most I know is that he published an unofficial fansite about Skyscrapersim. Anyway, that is besides the point. The biggest problem is that the article links to mostly primary sources, and most of them are dead due to Ryan shutting down the forum and website. Please stay in touch though, I would really appreciate your suggestions! Thanks MusicalKnight (an alt of NWPassage) talk 04:09, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Under that logic there should be no article for the Star Wars Holiday Special as it like Skyscrapersim has no official acknowledgement of its existence. The dead links lead to the no-longer-existing official acknowledgment of Skyscrapersim. — Preceding unsigned comment added by QuarioQuario54321 (talk • contribs) 00:43, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]