User talk:Minecraft69

What are you doing to the SU episode page!?! Each season only has 26 episodes... The shorts count as one is production stand of view. Bismuth is 20 not 2 episodes in one.. The kindergarten kid and know your fusion are part of season 3. CN made a mistake earthlings is the truthful 100 episode. I had everything right now revert it. Sorry for being rude but your ruining the Paige.. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Changeisgame (talk • contribs) 19:12, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to List of Steven Universe episodes has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: List of Steven Universe episodes was changed by Minecraft69 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.975268 on 2015-09-28T16:44:57+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:45, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This was a false positive by ClueBot. However, please do not copy-paste episode summaries. That is a copyright violation. Thank you. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 16:54, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! Minecraft69, you are invited to The Co-op, a gathering place for editors where you can find mentors to help you build and improve Wikipedia. If you're looking for an editor who can help you out, please join us! I JethroBT (I'm a Co-op mentor) This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 17:40, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Minecraft69 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

127.0.0.1 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

---

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Lefty8899". The reason given for Lefty8899's block is: "Vandalism".

• Blocking administrator: Materialscientist (talk • blocks)

---

Accept reason: If you were under autoblocked before it seems to have now expired. Ping me if there is a problem. HighInBC 15:45, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The article Ocean Gem has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:NTV - Non notable standalone article about an episode

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --allthefoxes ^(Talk) 19:37, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at List of Steven Universe episodes. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. nyuszika7h (talk) 11:25, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at List of Steven Universe episodes, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. ToonZone forums is not a reliable source EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 17:45, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to List of Steven Universe episodes, but we are trying to write an encyclopedia here, so please keep your edits factual and neutral. Our readers are looking for serious articles and will not find joke edits amusing. Remember that Wikipedia is a widely used reference tool, so we have to take what we do here seriously. If you'd like to experiment with editing, use the sandbox instead. Thank you. nyuszika7h (talk) 18:58, 7 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to List of Steven Universe episodes. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. The dozen or so episodes you added were not mentioned in the source you provided. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 21:53, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The article Bismuth (Steven Universe) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced. Needs reliable sources to establish notability (WP:N). Please do not create articles that do not meet minimal mainspace standards.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  Sandstein  15:58, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at List of Steven Universe episodes. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. (Diff) – nyuszika7h (talk) 16:57, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'd suggest creating articles in draft space or userspace where you don't risk deletion, because the article you just created is completely unreferenced so far. nyuszika7h (talk) 15:56, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 01:40, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Alex|The|Whovian^? 13:15, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Any kind of edit warring from you when protection expires will result in a lengthy block. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 03:45, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bismuth (Steven Universe) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bismuth (Steven Universe) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Drmies (talk) 15:19, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Minecraft69. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[[

Image:Information icon4.svg|48px|left|alt=|link=]]

A tag has been placed on It's Over, Isn't It? requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article has never existed, has been deleted or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Yellow Diamond Δ Direct Line to the Diamonds 00:14, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I feel I should tell you that your userpage was vandalized and stayed vandalized for over two months. During this time, it read that "Jail Break" was your least favourite episode, and "Say Uncle" your favourite. I have undone the vandalism. --Yellow Diamond Δ Direct Line to the Diamonds 00:33, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted your edit of PtBr2, as CRC indicates that it is insoluble. This is the current CRC, plus a 30 year old one.JSR (talk) 16:46, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I only changed it because it had no source labelled. Minecraft69 (talk) 16:47, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A lot of the properties have little or no documentation.JSR (talk) 16:50, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I must ask, you reverted my edit within 2 minutes of me making it.. do you hang around those really obscure pages and constantly refresh them? (I thought I was the only one haha). Minecraft69 (talk) 16:53, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You don't have notification of changes to your watchlist?JSR (talk) 16:55, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nope. I don't use this account much. Minecraft69 (talk) 16:55, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rose's Scabbard is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rose's Scabbard until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — Quasar G. 12:33, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sworn to the Sword is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sworn to the Sword until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — Quasar G. 12:42, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I notice you have once again reverted the change made to List of Steven Universe episodes regarding the placement of Log Date 7 15 2. As mentioned when you previously reverted this change, I would appreciate if you could discuss on the talk page of the article about this change and we could reach some consensus. For reference, there have already been two discussions on this topic (here and here) with no replies but both coming to the consensus that Log Date 7 15 2 should be included in season 3. Either way, there's no definite answer on this, but so far the only evidence on the talk page suggests that it should be included in season 3. Cloud789 (talk) 05:31, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There is no official word on where Log Date stands, but for over a year and a half now, it's been accepted as the final episode of season 2, since it makes much more sense that "Super Watermelon Island" be the opener for season 3, and the long break between Log Date 7 15 2 and Super Watermelon Island was seen as a seasonal break (though they were called seasons 2A and 2B at the time, so more of a mid-season break). It also makes a lot of sense as the finale of season 2, since it's sort of a wrap-up episode. Also I was like 13 when I made this account so don't judge me based on my username. Minecraft69 (talk) 13:46, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Minecraft69. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Minecraft69. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent bold edit has been reverted. Per the bold, revert, discuss cycle, after a bold edit is reverted, the status quo should remain while a discussion is started instead of edit-warring, and it should be resolved before reinstating the edit, after a needed consensus is formed to keep it. -- /Alex/₂₁ 13:13, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:48, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:46, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm GorillaWarfare. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Everyone Knows That (Ulterior Motives)—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 15:25, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:37, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Abo Yemen was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

More sources are needed on this. Also currently, this article is just one paragraph and should be merged into an article like Impossible color

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Olo (color) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

𐩣𐩫𐩧𐩨 Abo Yemen (𓃵) 16:27, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Minecraft69! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! 𐩣𐩫𐩧𐩨 Abo Yemen (𓃵) 16:27, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Minecraft69. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Olo (color), a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:07, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Minecraft69. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Olo".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission, and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 17:26, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]