User talk:KronosAlight

Hello, KronosAlight, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially what you did for All Is Violent, All Is Bright. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Muhandes (talk) 00:19, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Loma prieta last city.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rcsprinter (speak) @ 09:33, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sister (In Solitude album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Producer (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited In Solitude, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Heavy metal and Swedish (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Beloved (I Killed the Prom Queen album) may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s and 2 "<>"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• | rev3Score = {{Rating|8|10}}<ref name="KYS review"><<cite web | url = http://www.killyourstereo.com/reviews/1572/i-killed-the-prom-queen-beloved/ |
• }}

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:16, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Something Wild (album).png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Peripitus (Talk) 10:51, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Svartidauði, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chilean (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:52, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Flesh Prevails, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Obscura and American. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the My First Story page, your edit caused an unnamed parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:25, 12 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Shelter (Alcest album) page, your edit caused an unnamed parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:33, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Écailles de Lune, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page My Bloody Valentine. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Lower Than Atlantis - Changing Tune.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 20:16, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:56, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited At. Long. Last. ASAP, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Telegraph. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:06, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Raleigh Ritchie You're a Man Now Boy Deluxe Edition.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:08, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Obscure Verses for the Multiverse, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page American. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:55, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Fall of Hearts, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Classic Rock. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Pleiades' Dust, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Spin. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Considered Dead, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chris Barnes. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:28, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, KronosAlight. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't re-combine the rank and reference. Having references next to the number warps the values and when sorted, does not render them in the correct order. Standard practice in years past has been to separate the ref from the number, and it looks neater. Ss112 11:46, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks for your edits on this page. While I agree with the general gist of your changes, I'm afraid that in places it introduced encyclopedic language. For example "and have influenced countless later bands" or "one of the greatest death metal albums of all time, and one of the best debut albums by any metal band". That sounds vague and promotional. We need a reference on Covenant selling "150,000 copies in the United States alone". The first sentence of the legacy section is duplicate "Morbid Angel is one of the most influential bands in death metal, and have been described as "one of the most influential and emulated bands in death metal". Karst (talk) 11:39, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I'm rephrasing a couple of the sentences and I've corrected the existing citation for the 150,000 claim by whoever added that. Those other ones are direct quotes from reputable critical sources, however I've rephrased them a bit now anyway. --KronosAlight (talk) 12:34, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers!

In the future, please do not leave unnecessary track listing parameters like you did on Hero (Bölzer album). If the track listing doesn't contain 20 tracks, remove the parameters. Also, there is a Studio infobox parameter that you can use instead of "Recorded" for the studio where the album was recorded at. "Recorded" is for the date recorded. Please see WP:MOSALBUM for more album article guidelines. Thanks. --Jennica✿ / ^talk 07:15, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Was due to a bug that resulted from creating the article in the visual editor rather than the source view. I'll see if I can report the bug to the admins. --KronosAlight (talk) 11:03, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Incantation Profane Nexus.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:18, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

That probably should go in its own section and not in the lede. Make sure that it it wp:DUE Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 07:09, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, KronosAlight. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Memoria Vetusta I - Fathers Of The Icy Age.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:31, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Reverence (Parkway Drive album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Classic Rock (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:31, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, KronosAlight. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Urbanomic, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:56, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:15, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Make Them Suffer Neverbloom 2012.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:31, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Urbanomic, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:40, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Burgerkill Venomous.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:50, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, KronosAlight. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Urbanomic".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Lapablo (talk) 09:06, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:30, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Loma prieta last city.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:13, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:09, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

In this edit here, I reverted some information that appears to be a violation of our copyright policy.

I provided a brief summary of the problem in the edit summary, which should be visible just below my name. You can also click on the "view history" tab in the article to see the recent history of the article. This should be an edit with my name, and a parenthetical comment explaining why your edit was reverted. If that information is not sufficient to explain the situation, please ask.

I do occasionally make mistakes. We get hundreds of reports of potential copyright violations every week, and sometimes there are false positives, for a variety of reasons. (Perhaps the material was moved from another Wikipedia article, or the material was properly licensed but the license information was not obvious, or the material is in the public domain but I didn't realize it was public domain, and there can be other situations generating a report to our Copy Patrol tool that turn out not to be actual copyright violations.) If you think my edit was mistaken, please politely let me know and I will investigate. S Philbrick(Talk) 12:22, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions. It seems that you may have added public domain content to one or more Wikipedia articles, such as Moldova. You are welcome to import appropriate public domain content to articles, but in order to meet the Wikipedia guideline on plagiarism, such content must be fully attributed. This requires not only acknowledging the source, but acknowledging that the source is copied. There are several methods to do this described at Wikipedia:Plagiarism#Public-domain sources, including the usage of an attribution template. Please make sure that any public domain content you have already imported is fully attributed. Thank you. – Isochrone (T) 13:28, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. I don't think that's true but if you could please identify it for me I'd be more than happy to rectify this! KronosAlight (talk) 14:12, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Moldova, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Telegraph. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:13, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Keir Starmer, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 19:35, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Moldova, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 18:17, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Additionally, you must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days, and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on a page within this topic.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Selfstudier (talk) 09:44, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Two-state solution, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Al Jazeera.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:07, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleting stuff from your talk page is seen as evidence that you have read and understood it. tgeorgescu (talk) 22:05, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't need educating on it. You do. KronosAlight (talk) 22:07, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Making you aware of contentious topics cannot be retracted. Not even by WP:ANI. tgeorgescu (talk) 22:10, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a report involving you at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement regarding a possible violation of an Arbitration Committee decision. The thread is KronosAlight. Thank you. tgeorgescu (talk) 20:49, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The following sanction now applies to you:

You are indefinitely topic banned from flood myths, broadly construed.

You have been sanctioned for the reasons provided in response to this arbitration enforcement request.

This sanction is imposed in my capacity as an uninvolved administrator under the authority of the Arbitration Committee's decision at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Pseudoscience#Final decision and, if applicable, the contentious topics procedure. This sanction has been recorded in the log of sanctions. If the sanction includes a ban, please read the banning policy to ensure you understand what this means. If you do not comply with this sanction, you may be blocked for an extended period, by way of enforcement of this sanction—and you may also be made subject to further sanctions.

You may appeal this sanction using the process described here. I recommend that you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template if you wish to submit an appeal to the arbitration enforcement noticeboard. You may also appeal directly to me (on my talk page), before or instead of appealing to the noticeboard. Even if you appeal this sanction, you remain bound by it until you are notified by an uninvolved administrator that the appeal has been successful. You are also free to contact me on my talk page if anything of the above is unclear to you. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 20:38, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited John Healey (politician), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Blair ministry.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:58, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You've made multiple reverts on the page 2024 Nuseirat rescue operation in the past 24 hours.

1. here
2. multiple here

For fairness and consistency, you must self-revert your most recent revert. Namely, the Hamas-run Gaza Health Ministry claimed on the same day... should be changed back to the Gaza Health Ministry reported on the same day... Dylanvt (talk) 00:06, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No.

It is important, and correct, information for claims made by such a source, who should not be presented as if impartial and neutral.

Thanks. KronosAlight (talk) 07:34, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a report involving you at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement regarding a possible violation of an Arbitration Committee decision. The thread is KronosAlight. Thank you. Dylanvt (talk) 13:23, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@KronosAlight, please avoid placing this where you did. To make sure that AE remains orderly, everyone has to respond in their own section. FortunateSons (talk) 14:17, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies, didn’t realise that. I assumed it was for ‘top-level’ comments. Has it been moved to my section? KronosAlight (talk) 14:18, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not for me, but I’m editing on mobile, so my view may be off. If it hasn’t happened, I would encourage you to do it yourself. FortunateSons (talk) 14:20, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

For an example of how those discussions are usually structured, you can look at the recently closed or recently archived discussions. :) FortunateSons (talk) 14:21, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. I've removed my reply and pasted it into 'my' section KronosAlight (talk) 14:23, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I’m still seeing one of your replies in BilledMammals section? FortunateSons (talk) 14:26, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, and with no prejudice to the case, I would strongly recommend that you follow BMs advice, and revert any edit that may be a 1RR violation - insofar as that is possible. FortunateSons (talk) 14:28, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm in the process of doing that atm. I don't want to accidentally remove important edits by other editors. KronosAlight (talk) 14:29, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That’s good, thank you. At this point in time, reverting some may be impossible, but it would likely be beneficial to both you and the project if you did where it was still possible.

In the future, it’s often best practice to revert when asked, and discuss after, even if you think that the person asking is wrong about the policy. FortunateSons (talk) 14:33, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Message received. As far as I can tell, any of the disputed 'reverts' are resolved. Most already have Talk page threads because I wasn't the only one who saw his editorialising, but that's something I'd best steer clear of for a little while. KronosAlight (talk) 14:43, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, that’s probably a good idea. While I’m not an admin and therefore can’t tell you what to do, I would say that throughly rereading the relevant policies might avoid some of those issues in the future, particularly assuming good faith and 1RR. I wish you the best of luck with all future editing :) FortunateSons (talk) 14:52, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The following sanction now applies to you:

You are warned to abide by the one-revert rule when making edits within the scope of the Arab-Israeli conflict topic area.

You have been sanctioned per the consensus of administrators at this arbitration enforcement thread. Please note that the scope of the topic area includes both: (a) the entire set of articles whose topic relates to the Arab-Israeli conflict, broadly interpreted ("primary articles"); and (b) edits relating to the Arab-Israeli conflict, to pages and discussions in all namespaces with the exception of userspace.

This sanction is imposed in my capacity as an uninvolved administrator under the authority of the Arbitration Committee's decision at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Index/Palestine-Israel articles#Final decision and, if applicable, the contentious topics procedure. This sanction has been recorded in the log of sanctions. If the sanction includes a ban, please read the banning policy to ensure you understand what this means. If you do not comply with this sanction, you may be blocked for an extended period, by way of enforcement of this sanction—and you may also be made subject to further sanctions.

You may appeal this sanction using the process described here. I recommend that you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template if you wish to submit an appeal to the arbitration enforcement noticeboard. You may also appeal directly to me (on my talk page), before or instead of appealing to the noticeboard. Even if you appeal this sanction, you remain bound by it until you are notified by an uninvolved administrator that the appeal has been successful. You are also free to contact me on my talk page if anything above is unclear to you. — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 19:24, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited J. D. Vance, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Axios.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:46, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Christianity in Syria, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Syriac.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 20:16, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Washington Institute.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:55, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have recently made edits related to Armenia, Azerbaijan, or related conflicts. This is a standard message to inform you that Armenia, Azerbaijan, or related conflicts is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics. Bogazicili (talk) 19:03, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have recently made this edit in Antakya: Sectarian violence, rioting and looting became particularly intense by 1938 with Turkish mobs murdering Arabs and Armenians [1].

• First of all you have given a 100 page interval (489-589) in your edit as the source. Do you think this is reasonable?
• Second, can you provide page numbers and quotes to justify that edit? This is what I have found in the book that you added:
  • page 504:

    The rioting and disorders continue. M. and Mme. Lassus had the unpleasant experience of seeing an Arab, whom we all knew, killed by a Turkish mob; an Armenian, attacked at the same time, escaped by jumping into the Orontes and swimming to safety

    There's nothing that justifies your edit there.

Bogazicili (talk) 19:08, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Mepal has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 18:18, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Uh, what? What content are you even referring to?

The paragraph I quoted with direct citations? KronosAlight (talk) 19:46, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may have intended it as a quotation, but there was no quotation mark at the start of the passage. So your intention was not clear. Regardless, there's no reason to quote from your source when you could have written your own prose. — Diannaa (talk) 00:34, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mary Eberstadt, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages New York and American.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:55, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Some of your recent changes, such as the one you made to Hamas, have conflicted with our neutral point of view and/or verifiability policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, we urge all editors to provide reliable sources for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you seek consensus for certain edits by discussing the matter on the article's talk page. Just to reiterate: it is crucial that you seek consensus on the talk page before introducing controversial edits, especially on a well known contentious topic (WP:CT/A-I). Smallangryplanet (talk) 10:06, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Three scholars =/= Many. It’s surprising that I need to explain that to you KronosAlight (talk) 18:23, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You don't need to explain it to me, you need to obtain consensus for reverting existing consensus w/r/t a controversial position on the article's talk page. Smallangryplanet (talk) 18:37, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. There's a WP:Consensus required restriction on the Zionism page, so if you make a bold addition and it gets reverted, you can't reinstate it without consensus (see the header at Talk:Zionism, "Changes challenged by reversion may not be reinstated without affirmative consensus on the talk page"). Accordingly, please self-revert this edit. Thanks, Levivich (talk) 21:30, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Given how much of the Lede you wrote yourself in that article, how did you manage to forget to even mention the Second World War or the Holocaust? KronosAlight (talk) 22:17, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please self-revert your violation of consensus required. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 22:50, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done, challenge raised on Talk. KronosAlight (talk) 23:14, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

How much of the lead I wrote myself in that article? I wrote one sentence. FWIW, I don't see your self-reversion in the article history, perhaps the edit didn't save? Levivich (talk) 01:33, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

To enforce an arbitration decision, and for violating consensus required at Zionism on the page Zionism, you have been blocked from editing Wikipedia for a period of 1 week. You are welcome to edit once the block expires; however, please note that the repetition of similar behavior may result in a longer block or other sanctions.

If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the guide to appealing blocks (specifically this section) before appealing. Place the following on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Please copy my appeal to the [[WP:AE|arbitration enforcement noticeboard]] or [[WP:AN|administrators' noticeboard]]. Your reason here OR place the reason below this template. ~~~~}}. If you intend to appeal on the arbitration enforcement noticeboard, I suggest you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template on your talk page so it can be copied over easily. You may also appeal directly to me (by email), before or instead of appealing on your talk page. 

ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 23:13, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

---

Reminder to administrators: In May 2014, ArbCom adopted the following procedure instructing administrators regarding Arbitration Enforcement blocks: "No administrator may modify a sanction placed by another administrator without: (1) the explicit prior affirmative consent of the enforcing administrator; or (2) prior affirmative agreement for the modification at (a) AE or (b) AN or (c) ARCA (see "Important notes"). Administrators modifying sanctions out of process may at the discretion of the committee be desysopped."

No arbitration decision was violated, nor was any other requirement on that page.

When you asked me to revert my edit, I did so. KronosAlight (talk) 23:16, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@KronosAlight at exactly what point did you self-revert? Please provide a diff. TarnishedPath^talk 13:08, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a report involving you at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement regarding a possible violation of an Arbitration Committee decision. The thread is KronosAlight. Thank you. Butterscotch Beluga (talk) 03:16, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You need to come in to AE, KronosAlight. Ignoring it won't make it go away. Valereee (talk) 21:15, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I was visiting family, who largely live abroad, after the death of my father while this was going on, so I had no real time or capacity to engage in it.

And I never really wanted to. Most of the claims I made about fellow editors were proven true, backed up by third-party journalistic sources, and eventually ended up leading to various topic/account bans for the associated editors on that basis, as has since also been reported on.

A bit strange that my topic ban was indefinite, but when you look at the behaviour of those who've engaged in systematic dismantling and vandalism of hundreds upon hundreds of articles, they only get 1-year topic bans.

But at this point, I don't really have the energy to fight it.

Wikipedia has become a weapon among the toolset of antisemites to distort history, degrade the Jews, and delegitimise their state.

I hope others will seek to push back against that and reintroduce objectivity and balance in the relevant articles, but it's stress I don't need in my life even engaging in those debates at this point. KronosAlight (talk) 20:35, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm so sorry to hear about the death of your father, KA, my condolences. FWIW, "indefinite" doesn't mean "infinite" or forever. It typically means "until we're convinced you won't keep doing this". Which of course unless you come into the case and discuss is impossible for us to know. Valereee (talk) 19:23, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, I appreciate that.

If you could tell me more about what those options are I’d try and find the time to weigh them up.

I think the reality that since my ban was passed and now, nearly a dozen different editors have been banned basically for having done the very things I alleged while citing journalistic sources, should have an impact on that.

I was often angry and frustrated when I engaged with the same editors since banned and that seems to be largely the reason I was sanctioned, e.g. refusing to comply with the way they weaponised rules on e.g. 1RR, which the admins have since demonstrated were actively weaponised by these individuals in a co-ordinated way outside of Wikipedia.

When you know that the rules are being gamed, but every time they’re used against you by externally co-ordinated editors you either comply or face a ban, eventually you end up just saying, “Nah, <bleep> you, man, do your worst.”

Is it a great attitude? No.

But it’s at least now clear to the Wikipedia Administrators that the people I was getting angry at were genuinely engaged in a large-scale attempt to game Wikipedia rules and mass-edit vast numbers of articles in a co-ordinated and ideological way in order to fundamentally rewrite the entire history of the Jewish people and Israel itself.

I don’t know. Ultimately I don’t think I was wrong. Because I never actively distorted an article, ever. My real ‘violation’ was that I was rude and disrespectful to users we now know were, most of them at least, engaged in a conspiracy against Wikipedia’s fundamental principles of truth and openness. Should I have been calm and polite to users engaged in a conspiracy against Wikipedia’s fundamental principles of truth and openness? Maybe. But I’m also only a human being. I find it frustrating when many of them delete whole sections of articles full of citations but then you revert it and suddenly they’re throwing claims at you in your talk page, or when you quote fully a citation they do make to balance it out and again they’re reverting, and if you revert their revert suddenly they’ve got the Wiki lawyers involved. It’s a mess. KronosAlight (talk) 20:14, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your own topic ban has really nothing to do with those of other editors, and I can't agree with you that the editors who've been topic banned were "engaged in a conspiracy against Wikipedia’s fundamental principles of truth and openness" any more than I'd say your topic ban somehow indicates you were. This is a topic upon which people have extremely different POVs, and most of them genuinely believe their POV is correct.

What you can do is edit constructively and nonproblematically in other topics and in a few months, come back and appeal. And when someone drags you to AE, respond there to any concerns expressed in the 'results' section, until the case is closed. Ignoring an AE case is a non-starter. Valereee (talk) 20:26, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I don’t agree with you on that, especially given the overlapping circles of users involved in it, but it’s a Sunday, God’s day, and I’m not here to start a fight!

You know why I wasn’t active or responding during the AE case so let’s leave that one there. I did appreciate your kind words, and I’ll keep contributing elsewhere on Wikipedia, as I have been for more than a decade.

I’m recently on a reading trip about Britain in the 1850s and some of the key texts in my undergraduate political philosophy days which seem woefully slim on Wikipedia, so I have a few focuses now.

For now I’ll continue to contribute in other areas and hope to God that at least the temporary absence of the worst offenders on the PIA5 topics might lead to the reintroduction of some actual balance in the relevant articles. Maybe some of the vast amounts of information they deleted could even be restored. Fingers crossed, I suppose. It’s at least begun to gain some attention from mainstream newspapers so I’m happy to just contribute elsewhere for now.

As a point of clarification I hope you can help me with, I assume that being banned from the Palestinian-Israeli Conflict topic does not mean I am prevented from editing articles relating to, for example, a Jewish or Muslim individual? Is there a guideline about the boundaries there? I’ve no intention of violating the ruling, just need to understand where the line is because while I decide how to approach this topic ban I want to ensure I know where the line is and stay on the right side of it.

Thanks. KronosAlight (talk) 20:54, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The answer is probably 'it depends'. An individual who themselves is/has been/was involved in the conflict, I'd stay away from. If an article about a person mentions the conflict, at minimum you couldn't edit that portion of the article. Generally we tell people when in doubt, ask here on your own talk page first for clarification from an admin. This is the only place you can discuss the conflict at all, and then only in situations like this where you're asking for clarification of your own tban. Valereee (talk) 18:15, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The following topic ban now applies to you:

Topic-ban from the Arab-Israeli conflict, broadly construed.

You have been sanctioned as the result of this arbitration enforcement request.

This topic ban is imposed in my capacity as an uninvolved administrator under the authority of the Arbitration Committee's decision at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Index/Palestine-Israel articles#Final decision and, if applicable, the contentious topics procedure. This sanction has been recorded in the log of sanctions. Please read WP:TBAN to understand what a topic ban is. If you do not comply with this topic ban, you may be blocked for an extended period, by way of enforcement of this sanction—and you may also be made subject to further sanctions.

You may appeal this sanction using the process described here. I recommend that you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template if you wish to submit an appeal to the arbitration enforcement noticeboard. You may also appeal directly to me (on my talk page), before or instead of appealing to the noticeboard. Even if you appeal this sanction, you remain bound by it until you are notified by an uninvolved administrator that the appeal has been successful. You are also free to contact me on my talk page if anything above is unclear to you. Vanamonde93 (talk) 18:21, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

KronosAlight, your TBAN is indefinite, and it applies to content, not to pages. This edit is a clear-cut violation. As you have not been very active lately I am giving you a warning rather than a block, but please do not push the envelope here. Vanamonde93 (talk) 21:58, 6 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies. The violation wasn't deliberate, I just was adding information I considered relevant to her role as Home Secretary as it's something she's been very outspoken about but didn't have much detail on her page.

I've been finding it impossible to get the email confirmation to login to my own account so my inactivity is partly just because of that as well.

Not intentional, but thank you for going for a warning rather than a block. Appreciated. KronosAlight (talk) 22:56, 8 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited David Smith (British Labour politician), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page British.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:56, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hiroshi Suzuki (diplomat), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Classic FM.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:57, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Raymond Geuss.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of non-free use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of non-free use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable non-free use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable non-free use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file's talk page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Min☠︎rax^«¦talk¦» 12:46, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Deafheaven - Sunbather 2013.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:16, 31 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited British Jews, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Telegraph.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 22:20, 13 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:36, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rita Hinden, links pointing to the disambiguation pages South African and Labour Party were added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:50, 1 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your recent edits to Karl Löwith when you modified the page, you introduced unknown parameters. Just because you specify |some_param=some_variable does not always mean that variable will display. The |some_param= must be defined in the template. You can look at the documentation for the template you are using but it is also helpful to use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and ensure that the values you have added are displaying correctly. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the page will look like without actually saving it. It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. Note I have likely fixed the error by now so check the history of the page to see how it was fixed. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 04:19, 4 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Political views of H. G. Wells, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Brill was added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 21:35, 25 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed KronosAlight (talk) 15:59, 26 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]