User talk:Kkollaps

hello

Hi Kkollaps! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Rosiestep (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:03, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

On 30 January 2021, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Sophie (musician), which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page.  — Amakuru (talk) 17:27, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hyperpop, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Audio processing. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:17, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Shoegaze, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Loveless.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:14, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Theo Parrish, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Equalizer.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cocteau Twins, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Audio effect.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:51, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in complementary and alternative medicine. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

—PaleoNeonate – 12:53, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Main (band)

added a link pointing to Electroacoustic

Terry Riley

added a link pointing to CBS Records

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 28 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Every Man and Woman Is a Star, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rough Trade.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dream pop, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Audio effect.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Downtempo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Portishead.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Sleigh Bells (band)

added a link pointing to Heavy metal

Treats (album)

added a link pointing to Heavy metal

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from one or more pages into Aphex Twin. While you are welcome to re-use the content of Wikipedia, here or elsewhere, our licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please either provide attribution in this case, or identify the source article so that someone else can do it. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Please be aware that editors who repeatedly copy content without attribution risk being blocked from editing. Thank you. Cambial foliage❧ 06:16, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oh come off it, who on earth cares. Kkollaps (talk) 15:37, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:04, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Future bass, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Trap.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from one or more pages into Transcendental Meditation. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. Also, when copying, please be careful to copy over the supporting citations. Thanks.— Diannaa (talk) 15:30, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Crash (Ballard novel), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hollywood.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Forever Changes

added a link pointing to Arthur Lee

Hudson Mohawke

added a link pointing to Roadhouse

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:50, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jeanne Dielman, 23 quai du Commerce, 1080 Bruxelles, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Grant.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cheap Trick, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Heavy metal.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

[1]. Woovee (talk) 13:58, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The phrase I used was "a pioneering act" not "the pioneering act." Your rephrasing communicates exactly the same information as my original lol.

Kkollaps (talk) 19:44, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

In fact, your phrasing is more awkward, because you connect a plural pronoun ("them") with a singular noun ("one of the pioneers") Kkollaps (talk) 19:45, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Good try but no sorry. They were not the pioneering act of post-punk. This band were just one of the post-punk pioneers. Some fans are thick, those who wear blinkers shouldn't edit on wikipedia and instead make podcasts, write on blogs, whatever. But this is an encyclopedia and Neutrality is our most important rule.Woovee (talk) 04:37, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The sentence DOES NOT SAY they were "THE" pioneering act of post-punk!!! It literally says "a pioneering act", as in "a pioneering act among many." Can you not read properly?? I legitimately can't understand your problem otherwise. Kkollaps (talk) 05:53, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm genuinely wondering whether you can read English fluently? Is it not your first language? If so, this doesn't give you an excuse to make incoherent edits based on your lack of English mastery. Kkollaps (talk) 05:57, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I see you added some titles to the lead of Ingmar Bergman with one edit summary asking why were there no titles listed. If you look at Talk:Ingmar_Bergman, you will see a comment I wrote there about having too many titles in the lead. You can see I never got any response. The issue seems to be that, if we have a list of titles in the lead, people keep coming by and adding one more, then another, etc., until the list is just silly. After getting no replies, I edited it down, and then, some time later, someone came by and removed all of them, which I thought was fine. The article has plenty of information about his films, and I don't think there need to be any in the lead. For articles about other very famous directors, some leads also list no films. It would be awesome to have a conversation about this on the article's talk page if you would like to discuss further. Though I think the article would be fine without titles in the lead, I like what you did with the short list and poll mention, and if we could talk about it on the talk page, so that we can achieve/demonstrate consensus, that would make it easier to revert when people come by and add one more title. Cheers! DoctorMatt (talk) 01:45, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tim Buckley, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Starsailor.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Acid rock. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Haoreima (talk) 19:32, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The link is a journalist's repost of the text of their published piece from a magazine, the text of which is otherwise not publicly available. If you'd prefer me to remove any access to the text and simply post a dead citation, I can do that too. In the meantime, thanks for the condescending warning. Kkollaps (talk) 20:29, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Heaven Knows, Mr. Allison, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Houston.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:50, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - I know this is more than a year after the fact, but I've had to take an extended break from Wikipedia so I couldn't address this before. Anyway, I just wanted to answer the question you made in this edit about why the specific accolades and citations were moved from the lead... it's because in general such specific detail shouldn't appear in the lead, per Wikipedia:WikiProject Albums/Album article style advice#Lead, and I honestly believe it's better just to make a general statement in the lead that it has received widespread acclaim, and then to detail the accolades later on. Anyway, I have no interest in arguing and starting an edit war over this, so I'm going to leave it as it is... my main objective in editing the article was to find and add some contemporary reviews of the record, because I felt certain that it would have been reviewed in the UK music press at the time, and it was. Richard3120 (talk) 01:26, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mumble rap, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vibe.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Yes: eternalism vs annihilationism is a common one. Also personal identity vs dependent arising." - you're right. Regards, Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk! 07:21, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! DoctorMatt (talk) 18:06, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Buddhism, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The West.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:55, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ol' Dirty Bastard, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Free association.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:54, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thank you for your contributions. I note your now-reverted move of this article to Jungle (genre). A previous discussion found no consensus to use this title; the article should remain at the stable title. See Talk:Jungle music. 162 etc. (talk) 04:36, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Some of your recent genre changes, such as the one you made to Remain in Light, have conflicted with our neutral point of view and/or verifiability policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, we urge all editors to provide reliable sources for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you seek consensus for certain edits by discussing the matter on the article's talk page. Thank you. Doctorhawkes (talk) 08:05, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited David Lynch, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Atman and Trauma.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:55, 12 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

sorry, I reverted your change of the introduction because it should reflect the article, and it introduced links for common terms, including disambiguation - you might propose a change on the article talk -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:53, 29 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I wrote the previously accepted version of the introduction. IMO your version contains lots of overwrought adjectives and language ("grotesquely ludicrous", "indecipherable complexities"), sounds like a college essay that's trying too hard to sound smart. Not sure if English is your first language, but the current version isn't viable. Without talk page consensus, it should stay as it was before. But I tried to be nice and keep some element of your edits present. At this point, you'll have to colleect consensus at the talk page to make such changes. Kkollaps (talk) 13:23, 29 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Peaceray. I noticed that you recently removed content from Orson Welles without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Did you really expect that this edit would be acceptable? Peaceray (talk) 21:59, 26 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tears for Fears, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page New wave.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:55, 5 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war, according to the reverts you've made to Transcendental meditation. This means that you are repeatedly reverting content back to how you think it should be, despite knowing that other editors disagree. Once it is known that there is a disagreement, users are expected to collaborate with others, avoid editing disruptively, and try to reach a consensus – rather than repeatedly reverting the changes made by other users.

Important points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive behavior – regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not engage in edit warring – even if you believe that you are right.

You need to discuss the disagreement on the article's talk page and work towards a revision that represents consensus among everyone involved. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution if discussions reach an impasse. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to engage in edit warring, you may be blocked from editing. Bon courage (talk) 05:33, 24 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Kkollaps reported by User:Bon courage (Result: ). Thank you. Bon courage (talk) 05:12, 25 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Drmies (talk) 15:39, 25 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

It is a really bad idea, coming off a block, to continue the edit-war which caused the block in the first place. Please seek WP:CONSENSUS for any change you want to make to articles. Thanks. Bon courage (talk) 04:24, 27 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I'll worry about me, thanks. The changes to the article were made by you without consensus. If you want to butcher a section, get support. Kkollaps (talk) 04:45, 27 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

In fact I'm reverting to another user's changes. Bon courage (talk) 04:48, 27 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

You have previously removed the image of CAN from the Krautrock page numerous times. And for no reason. There is no rule on Wikipedia that a popular band can't represent a genre. See pages like Grungegaze, Shitgaze, Noise rock, Horror punk, Internet rap, Hyperpop, Psychedelic rock... etc. which have images of very popular bands representing the genre. Aradicus77 (talk) 17:47, 28 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]