User talk:Jsarmi

I welcome ideas!

Schacter, Daniel L (2001). The seven sins of memory: how the mind forgets and remembers. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. ISBN 0-618-21919-6.

The current date and time is 26 April 2026 T 12:57 UTC.

#	Title	Description
1	Timelines	How good are timelines are aiding people in reasoning about evolution of ideas
2	Group Biographies	How do you write group biographies

header 1	header 2	header 3
row 1, cell 1	row 1, cell 2	row 1, cell 3
row 2, cell 1	row 2, cell 2	row 2, cell 3

[This is a wiki link]

http://www.google.com

http://www.google.com

Hello! I see your seeking adoption. If your still interested I'd me more then happy to answer your questions and help you out. You can respond back to this by leaving a message here. If you have decided that you no longer wish to be adopted, please remove the adoptee's userbox from your userpage. Thanks, hope to hear from you soon! Matthew Yeager 02:48, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again and welcome to the adoption program!

Please take some time to think about what you would like out of this program and what you can devote to it. After you have thought about this please message me on my talk page about which areas you would like to focus on. As well, if you are completely new or you are not sure, you can let me know that and I can give you a general overview. You will get as much as you put in with this program. If you would like me to be someone that you can ask questions to every once and a while, then thats who i'll be. Yet, if you wish to be in constant contact with me and have me go over your work with you each day or so, then thats who i will be. This is your choice, just please let me know :P

Also if you could please remove the adoptee userbox from your userpage so that others know you have been adopted. If you like you can replace it with this user box:

The automated message to tell you someone has messaged you is a feature of Wikipedia and happens automatically whenever someone (besides yourself) edits your talk page. if you have any questions feel free to ask! Thank you for your time, Matthew Yeager 19:10, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just wanted to let you know a brought in an awesome adopter to help you out as well!!! this way you have twice as many people to always help you out. To make it easy for you, only post questions on his talk page and i'll check that. the other adopter is Evilclown93. He will be able to answer most any question, and i'll be here to help look over your edits and review any work you would like us to look at. i figure the more people you have checking your work out the faster you can learn and grow! if you have any questions just let Evilclown93 know and he'll be more then happy to get back to you. Matthew Yeager 20:44, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I've been brought in under my own will to learn (which probably is just to get used) to the adoption program. I will basically be your adopter, but I will report in a way (or bug basically) Matthew if I need a gentle nudge with this. Hope to see you soon! 21:02, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

Yes. You can create a user subpage (which is the best method). Here is what you type in to create a new subpage about Wikipedia, for example:

[[/Wikipedia]]
What it will look like actually: /Wikipedia

What this represents is that you can edit a user subpage located at User talk:Jsarmi/Wikipedia, part of your userspace. You can do this on your talkpage, or better on your userpage, which will link to User:Jsarmi/Wikipedia. I hope I hape helped you and you understand; if you don't understand, drop me a line. Evilclown93 20:03, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I take your point and hope I've addressed your issues: if not, it would make sense to keep the discussion on the article's talk page, to keep other editors aware of the discussion. Thanks, Verisimilus T 17:25, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not at all! There's not really a "right" or "wrong" place for anything - but it's generally a good idea to keep a record of article-based discussion on the article's page too. It was useful to have a notice on the user page too though, or I may not have noticed the edit! Verisimilus T 18:25, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. In contradiction to the above point, new comments are usually added to the bottom of the talk page; I've moved your comment on Pun.Eq.. Verisimilus T 18:27, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Great article. Really needs references though. Toddstreat1 20:12, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Done, I think. :-) Jsarmi 15:34, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, just wanted to say thank you for the great article as well - it has grown since it is a neat overview of the famous models. You just saved me around eights hours of working time. Thank you! 89.0.46.31 (talk) 08:10, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You should open a Wiktionary account if you expect to be taken seriously there. It's a tighter group than WP, BTW, with some probably justified concern with low-quality contributions. Things are a little more technical, less documented, and different from WP in unexpected ways, esp. in copyright. Copying the wording of a dictionary entry is strictly a no-no in Wiktionary, whereas it is not necessarily so in WP. Quote attribution practice is apparently not as precise in Wiktionary as in the best-referenced WP articles. DCDuring 15:55, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Good point :-) Thanks! I think my question was seriously presented and seriously taken by a couple of people, despite my lack of an account. For newbies, the need to have two accounts is a bit strange but given your differentiation between WP and Wiktionary, I can see how the two might be perceived by "insiders" as being very different. Allways a pleasure to learn more about all things Wiki. Jsarmi 20:42, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ay Jsarmi, good to see you around editing! i assume everything is going well for you. actually stopping by because i was just reading Group_development which you wrote \ are writing. let me know if you need any help, might i suggest stopping by WP:MoS to pick up some good tips to wikify your article. Also, i'm glad to see so many references !!!!!! but might i suggest reading about how to format references. the short version is to include your references through out the text.

EXAMPLE:
Chess is played on a square board of eight rows (called ranks and numbered from 1 to 8) and eight columns (called files and labeled from a to h) of squares^[1]. The colors of the sixty-four squares alternate and are referred to as light squares and dark squares. The pieces are divided into two matching sets, by convention called White and Black^[2]. Each player, referred to by the color of his pieces, begins the game with sixteen pieces: one king, one queen, two rooks, two bishops, two knights and eight pawns^[3][2]. The chessboard is placed with a light square at each player's right on the nearest rank, and the pieces are set out on the two ranks closest to each player, as shown in the diagram^[1]. Each queen stands on a square of its own color.

references

in the above example you can see the little 1's and 2's that refer to the references below. these are created by <ref name=NAMEOFTHESOURCE>www.example.com</ref> this way the reader can see exactly where the information is used. Also if you would like to use the same references multiple times you only have to refer to it by the name you gave it, such as <ref name=NAMEOFTHESOURCE/> to easily keep track of references, instead of listing them at the bottom of your page, you can just use <references/> and wiki will find all your <ref></ref> tags and fill in that section for you. if you have any questions let me know : ) MatthewYeager 12:05, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

	Time Times
Issue One • March 2008 • About the Newsletter Written by FrankP and Template Designed by Diligent Terrier
News Recent Project News Time Times I, Zginder, have started this the official newsletter of the project. This newsletter is part of the Time Times, which has been created to update our members on the latest news at the project and on time. This first posting is late because I did not even come up with the idea until 2008-03-08. In the future I plan to have it ready to publish before the month begins. (If anyone should do things on time on Wikipedia it should be us, no?) Article count over 800! By my count we now have 873 articles but, will have many more soon. Less than 200 are assessed though, plenty of work for us to do. Portal:Time now working thanks to Yamara. Project member count reaches 11 members! Keep inviting all your WikiFriends. Remember: The project is now accessible from new shortcuts, WP:TIME and WP:TIMEPRO. Project gets a new look thanks to Yamara, if you have not seen it yet stop on by. Recent Time News The last day of February was leap day. Lets make this article featured before the next one comes around on 2012-02-29. Daylight saving time is in effect in the United States and a few other counties as of 2008-03-09. This article is our only featured article.
Archives • Newsroom
If you no longer wish to longer receive this newsletter, please add your name here. Newsletter delivered by {{{Delivered by}}}.

	Time Times
Issue Two • April 2008 • About the Newsletter Written by FrankP and Template Designed by Diligent Terrier
News Recent Project News Article count on at 961! We now have 961 articles but, will have many more soon as only a few are marked as in our project. At least 803 are unassessed though, plenty of work for us to do. Project member count reaches 12 members! Keep inviting all your WikiFriends. Award offered—Since 2008-01-05, Sharkface217 has offered a Barnstar to the editor who can expand the article Timeline. It certainly needs it, now that it has been disambiguated from Chronology: Go to the Timeline listing on the Awards page to find out Sharkface's minimum requirements! From the Time Portal An IP added this funny comment to Portal talk:Time "I never though I would see the day mankind succeeds in creating a time portal." Recent Time News From the leap second article: in April 2008: ITU Working Party 7A will submit to ITU Study Group 7 project recommendation on stopping leap second[s]. Calendars met on March 21. It was Good Friday (Western Christianity, 2008); Purim ends at sundown (Judaism, 2008); Naw-Rúz in the Bahá'í calendar, Benito Juárez Day in Mexico, World Poetry Day.
Archives • Newsroom
If you no longer wish to longer receive this newsletter, please add your name here. Newsletter delivered by {{{Delivered by}}}.

	Time Times
Issue Three • May 2008 • About the Newsletter Written by FrankP and Template Designed by Diligent Terrier
News Recent Project News Article count at 1074! At least 911 are unassessed though, plenty of work for us to do. Award offered—Since 2008-01-05, Sharkface217 has offered a Barnstar to the editor who can expand the article Timeline. It certainly needs it, now that it has been disambiguated from Chronology: Go to the Timeline listing on the Awards page to find out Sharkface's minimum requirements! From the Time Portal History of timekeeping devices reaches Good Article Status —On April 7 the history of time keeping article became a GA. This is our only top importance article to reach this prestigious status. This was only possible with the dedication of the Tzatziki Squad. They are continuing to work on the article to reach Feature Article status. History of timekeeping devices in Egypt was a DYK —The article appeared on the Main Page on April 8. With this text: "...that despite Herodotus's claim that the sundial was invented in Babylon, the oldest known example is from Egypt?" This also was only possible thanks to the Tzatziki Squad. Recent Time News None that I know of.
Archives • Newsroom
If you no longer wish to longer receive this newsletter, please add your name here. Newsletter delivered by {{{Delivered by}}}.

Hi! You might be interested in the new May 2008 issue of the WikiProject History of Science newsletter, in which you are recognized for your contribution of Laboratory Life, which was the "article creation challenge" from a previous newsletter. Yours in discourse--ragesoss (talk) 23:59, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

	Time Times
Issue four • June 2008 • About the Newsletter Written by FrankP and Template Designed by Diligent Terrier
News Recent Project News Article count at 1091! 979 are unassessed though, plenty of work for us to do. Project member count reaches 16 members! Keep inviting all your WikiFriends. Award offered—Since 2008-01-05, Sharkface217 has offered a Barnstar to the editor who can expand the article Timeline. It certainly needs it, now that it has been disambiguated from Chronology: Go to the Timeline listing on the Awards page to find out Sharkface's minimum requirements! From the Time Portal History of timekeeping devices reaches A-Class Status—On May 22 the history of time keeping article was promoted by User:Zginder to A-Class. This is our only article to reach this prestigious status. This was only possible with the dedication of the Tzatziki Squad. They are continuing to work on the article to reach Feature Article status. Merkhet was a DYK—The article appeared on the Main Page on April 28. With this text: "... that merkhets were Ancient Egyptian timekeeping devices that tracked the movement of certain stars over the meridian in order to ascertain the time during the night, when sundials could not function?" This also was only possible thanks to the Tzatziki Squad. Recent Time News The June Solstice takes place on 2008-06-20T23:59.
Archives • Newsroom
If you no longer wish to longer receive this newsletter, please add your name here. Newsletter delivered by {{{Delivered by}}}.

Hello. I'm part of a research group at the University of Washington. In April, we met with Wikipedians to learn what they would like to know about other editors’ history and activities (within Wikipedia) when interacting with them on talk pages. The goal was to gather feedback to help design a tool that could quickly communicate useful information about other Wikipedians. We have now created a few images that we feel represent some of what our participants thought was important. We would appreciate it if you took a few minutes of your time to complete an online survey that investigates whether or not these images would be useful to you. Your quick contribution would be very valuable to our research group and ultimately to Wikipedia. (When finished, the code for this application will be given over to the Wikipedia community to use and/or adjust as they see fit.)

We are particularly interested in feedback from new editors! We want to make sure this tool meets your needs.

Willing to spend a few minutes taking our survey? Click this link.

Please feel free to share the link with other Wikipedians. The more feedback, the better! The survey is completely anonymous and takes less than 10 minutes to complete. All data is used for university research purposes only.

Thank you for your time! If you have any questions about our research or research group, please visit our user page. Commprac01 (talk) 23:44, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Additional details about our research group are available here.

Thank you for your interest in our user study. Please email me at credivisstudy@gmail.com. Wkmaster (talk) 22:16, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]