User talk:Jetstreamer

Skip to table of contents

This is Jetstreamer's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed

Archives (index): 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16Auto-archiving period: 30 days

Welcome to my talk page. Please adhere to the talk page guidelines and particularly the following: Please post your new topic at the bottom of this page. Please sign and date your entry by inserting "~~~~" at the end. Please specify a descriptive subject or headline for a new topic and separate subtopics by ===heading=== lines, if needed. Please indent your posts with one more ":" than what you are replying to, i.e. begin with ":" if replying to an existing topic and "::" if replying to a reply. I will generally respond here to comments that are posted here, rather than replying via your Talk page (or the article Talk page, if you are writing to me here about an article), so you may want to watch this page until you are responded to, or specifically let me know where you'd prefer the reply. ⇒ Start a new Talk topic.

Discussions on this page have often led to previous arguments being restated. Please read recent comments and look in the archives before commenting.

I don't know what kind of reversion you may have made in TAP Portugal page according to your justification, since TAP Portugal doesn't fly to Tel Aviv, nor any other city in Asia. Nupest 0:10, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

Hi jetstremar I am runaparvin you told me if I want to add anything I have to add a reliable source but how can I add a reliable source changing the destinations? Please help me adding a reliable source but I can't understand why not you changing the page of us-bangla airlines.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Runaparvin (talk • contribs)

And still the 4th worst *at the time*. Please read the commit / diff information "Jetstreamer" before reverting changes. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Air_New_Zealand_Flight_901 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Voigty (talk • contribs)

http://news.klm.com/air-france-klm-2014-15-winter-schedule-26-october-2014--28-march-2015-en/

Air France-KLM 2014-15 winter schedule (26 October 2014 – 28 March 2015) KLM continue to serve the routes launched this summer: to Bilbao (Spain) and Zagreb (Croatia).— Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.61.27.46 (talk • contribs)

Hello Jetstreamer: Wow you caught me as Im about to go get some sleep :) so I guess to the point, lol..ok Aeroflot 593, about the Boeing 737 next to it, I'm agreeing with you, not 100 percent but certainly enough to tell you I see your point, and you are probably correct. About listing the Jessica Dubroff article there, I put an explanation as why she-or should I say, it-should be on the "see also" list right next to the link itself. I mean to me they were similar because they were both instances in which children were in the cockpit during a tragic circumstance. Anyways, take care, God bless you!...Antonio AeroCrazyLot Martin (loser's talk page) 13:55, August 30, 2016 (UTC)

Please note that Air Namibia 'resumes' the Accra route which they've abandoned in 2013. The Lagos-leg, however is new, therefore 'begins'. Please correct this.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Bundubear (talk • contribs) 29 August 2017 (UTC)

I thought Aeromexico Connect took over Aeromexico’s main Monterrey-Las Vegas route. My apologies.

Robbie2448 ^Talk 12:21, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

Stop adding JFK as a destination from EZE with LATAM Chile, although bookable there is not a nonstop flight, if we start adding direct flights to airport's pages it will be a real mess as we will have to add every direct flight offered by an airline worldwide, there must be a change in the politics of publishing that. I will be reverting any changes you make because believe me that I am familiarized with Wikpedia's WP:AIRPORT-CONTENT, so I cite the following: "However, avoid listing direct flights that contain a stop at a domestic hub, as virtually all of these are simply flights from one "spoke city" to a hub, with the plane continuing from the hub to a second spoke city. Furthermore, these flights often involve plane changes, despite the direct designation. Including these flights dramatically increases the length of destination listings, artificially inflates the airline's presence at a location and requires constant updating, as these "timetable direct" destinations have little rhyme or reason and may change as often as every week or two."

So it means that you are wrong and you should not post JFK as a destination with LATAM Chile because it is a stop at a domestic hub, with the plane continuing from the hub to a second spoke city.

Hi, you left a message on my talk page. I’m not sure weather you saw it because you never got back to me. I’m still learning and I am really not good at citing sources. I am not trying to vandalize here, I love Wikipedia and I’ve been reading for a long time. To me, contributing is my way to give back, I feel bad for not donating but contributing is my way to give back to the community. AdamT777 23:06 (UTC) 21 May 2020

"Today, it is any international airline with a strong connection to its home country or that represents its home country internationally, regardless of whether it is government-owned" on flag carrier's page, but Virgin Australia permanently ditched long-haul flight and wide-body aircrafts, that make Virgin as a only regional airline. (link:https://paxex.aero/virgin-australia-to-ditch-twin-aisle-fleet-focus-on-domestic-and-regional-service/)so you should make us delete Virgin on Australian flag carrier!!!Social25062 (talk) 5:53, January 2021 (UTC)

Hello Jetstreamer,

Much has happened since the last newsletter over two months ago. The open letter finished with 444 signatures. The letter was sent to several dozen people at the WMF, and we have heard that it is being discussed but there has been no official reply. A related article appears in the current issue of The Signpost. If you haven't seen it, you should, including the readers' comment section.

Awards: Barnstars were given for the past several years (thanks to MPGuy2824), and we are now all caught up. The 2021 cup went to John B123 for leading with 26,525 article reviews during 2021. To encourage moderate activity, a new "Iron" level barnstar is awarded annually for reviewing 360 articles ("one-a-day"), and 100 reviews earns the "Standard" NPP barnstar. About 90 reviewers received barnstars for each of the years 2018 to 2021 (including the new awards that were given retroactively). All awards issued for every year are listed on the Awards page. Check out the new Hall of Fame also.

Software news: Novem Linguae and MPGuy2824 have connected with WMF developers who can review and approve patches, so they have been able to fix some bugs, and make other improvements to the Page Curation software. You can see everything that has been fixed recently here. The reviewer report has also been improved.

Suggestions:

• There is much enthusiasm over the low backlog, but remember that the "quality and depth of patrolling are more important than speed".
• Reminder: an article should not be tagged for any kind of deletion for a minimum of 15 minutes after creation and it is often appropriate to wait an hour or more. (from the NPP tutorial)
• Reviewers should focus their effort where it can do the most good, reviewing articles. Other clean-up tasks that don't require advanced permissions can be left to other editors that routinely improve articles in these ways (creating Talk Pages, specifying projects and ratings, adding categories, etc.) Let's rely on others when it makes the most sense. On the other hand, if you enjoy doing these tasks while reviewing and it keeps you engaged with NPP (or are guiding a newcomer), then by all means continue.
• This user script puts a link to the feed in your top toolbar.

Backlog:

Saving the best for last: From a July low of 8,500, the backlog climbed back to 11,000 in August and then reversed in September dropping to below 6,000 and continued falling with the October backlog drive to under 1,000, a level not seen in over four years. Keep in mind that there are 2,000 new articles every week, so the number of reviews is far higher than the backlog reduction. To keep the backlog under a thousand, we have to keep reviewing at about half the recent rate!

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Spongebob796 (talk • contribs) 30 August 2024 07:47 (UTC)

I am relatively new with WP contribution. So you may forgive me for some mistakes.... I only intended to improve VIASA page with better pictures and retuned captions. I.e. I feel the the DC 10 picture in the opening summary is not good enough. So I put the Boeing 747, the largest aircraft ever operated by VIASA. But I understand that this may be offensive to the previous contributors... How to deal with it? Settignano (talk) 09:21, 15 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Settignano: It's not offensive at all, you're free to edit any article but please try not to remove sourced content.--Jetstreamer ^Talk 13:55, 15 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

TAP's route review. Why are the correct revisions not being accepted? TAP does not fly to Algiers, Helsinki, Abidjan, and Cape Town. thanks Alvorado (talk) 13:22, 25 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

The map of current destinations do not support terminated ones.--Jetstreamer ^Talk 16:13, 26 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Before deleting the corrections, you should verify if TAP actually flies to the destinations I absolutely indicated it doesn't. I'm Portuguese, I know what I'm talking about. Therefore, Wikipedia isn't accurate. I'm not going to contribute anything further. Alvorado (talk) 16:24, 26 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know what kind of reversion you may have made in TAP Portugal page according to your justification, since TAP Portugal doesn't fly to Algiers, Helsinki, Abidjan, and Cape Town. If you don't accept my corrections, then consult FlightConnections and make the corrections, since what's on the Wiki is wrong. Alvorado (talk) 10:43, 27 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

It's you the one that must provide sources for your changes. Read WP:BURDEN.--Jetstreamer ^Talk 22:10, 27 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Good day,

you've reverted my addition of two routes in the Gran Canaria Airport article saying "The source is more than ten years old" - I could not find any rule on Wikipedia specifying that sources beyond a certain age aren't allowed. Can you please explain? Regards, Magnetohydrodynamics (talk) 12:03, 3 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Airline routes are so dynamic that the newest the reference the better. By the way, have you found anything in Wikipedia saying that you need to breath in order to edit articles?--Jetstreamer ^Talk 18:13, 3 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Good evening, of course the newer the better. However, if you ever looked for airline route references that satisfy Wikipedia's eligibility criteria yourself, you'll know that they often simply don't exist. So we should be glad for any eligible source we can find, and use them accordingly if there's nothing prohibiting them here. Can we reinstate my edits now? Cheers, Magnetohydrodynamics (talk) 21:26, 3 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Have you tried with the airline's official website?--Jetstreamer ^Talk 20:49, 4 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Wait, you don't know that...? These are, just like airport web presences, not considered independent sources on Wikipedia and hence may not be used. Otherwise I wouldn't even bother with old sources like the one I provided. Magnetohydrodynamics (talk) 14:27, 5 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

It's better to use an updated timetable than a source that has been outdated for 10 years.--Jetstreamer ^Talk 15:49, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]