User talk:Interstellar20

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by RoySmith were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

This reads like an autobiography. Possibly promotional enough for WP:G11. We don't include external links in the main body of articles, per WP:EXT.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Delicia Reed-Musk and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Delicia Reed-Musk, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

-- RoySmith (talk) 20:01, 3 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Interstellar20! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! -- RoySmith (talk) 20:01, 3 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Delicia Reed-Musk, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 23:04, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Interstellar20. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Delicia Reed-Musk".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Bkissin (talk) 15:56, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Rosbif73. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Elon Musk, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Rosbif73 (talk) 15:25, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Any changes to Elon Musk's page need to be approved by him first. This is true and correct information that could not be submitted because of identity theft and fraud. Please do not remove, update, add or, change anymore sections of Mr. Musk's page.

Thank you. Interstellar20 (talk) 15:40, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Elon Musk, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Rosbif73 (talk) 15:46, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Elon Musk, you may be blocked from editing. DVdm (talk) 19:31, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: be very careful with messages like this: legal threats will get you blocked—see Wikipedia:No legal threats. - DVdm (talk) 19:35, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The guidelines do not state the information must be backed by an article. The process is not in the guidelines as you have stated. Please stop removing the information from Mr. Musk's page. Interstellar20 (talk) 19:36, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Do have a very careful read of Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons. - DVdm (talk) 19:40, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Elon Musk; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Katie^talk 21:18, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Elon Musk. - DVdm (talk) 22:09, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violations of Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  ~ ToBeFree (talk) 00:35, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Creating hoax articles and spreading misinformation is vandalism; making unfounded allegations about article subjects is disruptive. This appears to be a disruption-only account, and it has been one for a long time. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 00:37, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

u were very wrong about the fake pregnancy — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:8801:84:2400:79BA:851B:D78D:C624 (talk) 22:20, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]