User talk:IntGrah

I don't understand why you moved Chromatic Fantasia and Fugue. There is only one. Do you suggest to move the Brandenburg Concertos? -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:40, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe I made a mistake, but my thought process was that if a title is not directly associated with Bach, then it should have some indication of the composer, (parentheses or BWV). For example, Goldberg Variations, Well-Tempered Clavier and St Matthew Passion are almost synonymous with "Bach" by their titles, but Chromatic Fantasia and Fugue, Wie schön leuchtet der Morgenstern, and Overture in the French style are not so much, either because the title is generic or in German. I think Brandenburg Concertos would fall into the former. What do you think of this rule of thumb? Sorry for not discussing this change first. IntGrah (talk) 07:59, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I see that you moved more than that one. Please consider reverting yourself. You can propose a renaming on WT:Classical music. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:45, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations, IntGrah! The list you nominated, List of masters of Trinity College, Cambridge, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best lists on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.

This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured list. Keep up the great work! Cheers, PresN (talk) via FACBot (talk) 00:26, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, again the user unspoken passion used the word "imposed" therefore there was a source needed for such writing, in this case, the page is about a concept of law of a religion, and the sources of it are Quran and hadith otherwise he (unspoken passion) did not provide litte to no evidences for his writings, and when he did the netruality his sources were questionable and biased, im not accusing anyone but i think because of his profile info that he is intersted in topics of counterterrorism or war on terror and the misreperstaion (in my view) of a huge amount of people for faults of a small few has made him biased without knowledge, therefore i am gonna revision that page and i use netrual,unbiased sources for the writing, please feel free to tell me if you think im incorrect in anyway so i can improve my writing, thank you and gn. 88.240.93.246 (talk) 21:34, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, IntGrah. I'm just posting to let you know that List of masters of Trinity College, Cambridge – a list that you have been heavily involved with – has been chosen to appear on the Main Page as Today's featured list for October 14. The TFL blurb can be seen here. If you have any thoughts on the selection, please post them on my talk page or at TFL talk. Regards, Giants2008 (Talk) 21:36, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, IntGrah. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Rank-pairing heap, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:07, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]