User talk:Gummer85

Sorry for the delay; I haven't logged in for a while.

No, I'm not in Boston any more. After graduating I bounced around in the Air Force for a while and finally landed in Annapolis after getting out.

I'm still casting around for better sources on the keel effect and the stability of high- and low-wing aircraft in general. I was disturbed to find that the Handbook of Aeronautical Knowledge goes rather too far with the pendulum analogy, actually saying that gravity swings the fuselage back down under the wings like a pendulum bob under its pivot. The free-body diagrams on my white board and notes from class don't count as sources, and my S&C textbooks dive right into the stability derivatives without caring much what features of the aircraft configuration produced them. I think maybe one of Roskam's books might address the issue; I'll have to see if I can get ahold of one.

Jgershon (talk) 14:20, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:CM-alpha.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:48, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your upload of File:Aircraft Angle of Incidence (improved)--1080x660--25Mar2009.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 11:37, 14 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:02, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:03, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]