User talk:Creativecreatr

Hi Creativecreatr. I'm afraid I don't have the time or knowledge to review your draft at the moment. I would suggest you use the WP:AFC process to create this; that way you can ensure someone more experienced will look through it. However, I have moved the page to User:Creativecreatr/Dr Dolor. Draft pages can be developed either in the draft namespace (in which case, their titles with be something like "Draft:Dr Dolor") or in your personal userspace (where their titles will be something like "User:Creativecreatr/Dr Dolor"). The page you created, "User:Dr Dolor", looked like the title of someone else's userpage; you shouldn't use titles like that one. Just something to keep in mind. Vanamonde (Talk) 04:39, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I tried using it but it seems another contributor created a draft page with the same name. So what do you suggest I do now.(Creativecreatr (talk) 05:05, 15 August 2019 (UTC))[reply]

Read the instructions at WP:AFC. You don't have to be in the draft namespace to use that process; you can use it with your current title, as far as I know. Vanamonde (Talk) 05:07, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I read it again but I can only find how to submit a draft for review, at this time can you help.(Creativecreatr (talk) 05:18, 15 August 2019 (UTC))[reply]

Hello, Creativecreatr. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the COI guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
• disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. – Athaenara ✉ 11:49, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I’m not editing for that purpose. Maybe you are mistaken me for the first editors that work on the page because I read the deletion discussion before working on it, which I explained to one of the admin. I have gone through Dr Dolor page and read many articles about him online and he is notable. Can you really tell me why his page is being deleted aside the name use to create the previous page. I just want to know because I feel there are still many things I need to learn about editing Wikipedia article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Creativecreatr (talk • contribs) 09:50, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aj200 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aj200 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Celestina007 (talk) 04:18, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Éric Akoa is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Éric Akoa until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. PK650 (talk) 02:12, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ike Bishop Okoronkwo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ike Bishop Okoronkwo until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  Versace1608  ^{Wanna Talk?} 17:09, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:David Gibson (designer). Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 17:58, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the notification. Creativecreatr (talk) 18:00, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by GoingBatty was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

All of the references appear to be interviews or written by Gibson. The chicagodesignarchive.org and www.auk.edu.kw references have the same text. Please read WP:Independent sources and WP:Reliable sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:David Gibson (designer) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:David Gibson (designer), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

GoingBatty (talk) 00:00, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Creativecreatr! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! GoingBatty (talk) 00:00, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I learned a lot of your write up. I will be glad if you help me delete the draft, I will write about another subjects Creativecreatr (talk) 00:05, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Creativecreatr, please do not remove Wiki-Links as you did in 1947–48 FC Basel season. I have been working on the history of FC Basel for years and am creating these pages in due course. Thank you. Greetings from Switzerland. --Huligan0 (talk) 14:26, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheImaCow was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Doğukan Yüce and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Doğukan Yüce, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

--TheImaCow (talk • contribs) 17:59, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Creativecreatr. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "David Gibson".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:52, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Creativecreatr. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Doğukan Yüce".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! S0091 (talk) 20:08, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]