User talk:CommunityNotesContributor

Archives

Index Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3 Archive 4

This page has archives. Topics inactive for 180 days are automatically archived by ClueBot III if there are more than 10.

		Brownie
		This is awarded to CommunityNotesContributor for accumulating more than 17.5 points during the December 2025 AfC backlog drive. Your dedication and contributions to Wikipedia's content review process were crucial in reviewing over 9,000 drafts during the drive. Thank you for your participation and helping to reduce the backlog! ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 15:43, 11 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I see you have removed ruesha Littlejohn from the current squad. I just thought id let you know she is still with the team just shes on a ban atm due to her tackle last year. You might want to re-add her. Pendolino390119 (talk) 22:32, 12 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

My bad, have restored. CNC (talk) 22:49, 12 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

its alright. Thought it would've been a mistake Pendolino390119 (talk) 22:52, 12 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Inviting you to help out, no pressure though—just thought this type of thing might be in your wheelhouse!

WP:SCA / WP:SERIOUSLYCONTESTED Alexandraaaacs1989 (talk) 17:40, 13 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, saw that but not really interested. You'd be better off notifying Wikipedia:Fringe theories/Noticeboard or Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard. Regards, CNC (talk) 17:52, 13 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I think I'll wait before proposing an RM for WP:WHYWAIT, in order not to be WP:TROUTed. Boud (talk) 11:21, 14 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

You joke about it, but I wrote that a few days ago and spent that long trying to figure out a title. With WP:WAIT is taken, WP:Too soon to move and WP:Wait, don't move also came to mind. I still don't like the title at all is the irony. Remember that April 1 isn't too far away, that'd be a good time for people to !vote wait and the proposer not get trouted ;) CNC (talk) 11:25, 14 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I saw your edit summary on the article Craig Silvey about an "edit notice". How does one employ an edit notice? Thank you. _signed, Kvinnen (talk) 14:20, 14 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit summary. I had forgotten to add this to my question, here it is. Thanks! _signed, Kvinnen (talk) 14:21, 14 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

It's at the base name Template:Editnotices/Page, so for Silvey the notice is at Template:Editnotices/Page/Craig Silvey. But as you will see they can only be edited by page movers, template editors, and admins. So your best bet is to make an edit request on the talk page for someone to add it when there is a need to create one, or use the talk page when one already exists but needs an addition. There isn't a request template for editnotice space that I know of, but {{Edit template-protected}} would work (which template editors and admins will check). Regards, CNC (talk) 14:34, 14 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Theoretically, I can make a template page like the one you made for Craig Silvey? Thanks! _signed, Kvinnen (talk) 15:15, 14 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Not without the correct permissions no: Warning: This page can only be created and/or edited by administrators, template editors, and page movers because it matches an entry on the local or global title blacklist. The blacklist being Template:Editnotices space. CNC (talk) 15:20, 14 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I will stay away then. Thank you! _signed, Kvinnen (talk) 15:26, 14 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Editnotices/Page/United States v. Maduro, et al. has been nominated for discussion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 02:22, 16 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi CNC; that edit you made on Trump is supported by Onyx and that means that there are 2 of you supporting that edit; Space4Time is currently reverting which seems incorrect. As an option, it seems to you could change it back based on support from Onyx and open Talk page discussion at the Trump page where Space4Time can explain his thinking in reverting against 2-3 editors. ErnestKrause (talk) 15:00, 29 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I already spoke to Space4Time3Continuum2x and explained to them the BRD restriction, but it seems that's been ignored. It was only the miss-citing that I was reverting as a sloppy edit per the edit summary; I wasn't opposing the content itself, nor do I endorse it. As I say on my userpage I otherwise can't be bothered with an edit war, so whatever issues others have with the content, that's been restored a second time now, will have to be dealt with by other editors. Thanks anyway, CNC (talk) 15:14, 29 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for getting back on this. Since you are supporting Onyx, then I'll offer to support you if you take this to Talk page. That would make two more editors supporting your viewpoint. ErnestKrause (talk) 15:22, 29 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

To be clear, I'm not supporting another editor. CNC (talk) 15:24, 29 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red | February 2026, Vol 12, Issue 2, Nos 358, 359, 361, 362, 363 Online events: New: Alphabet run: countries starting with B | Black Women | Works by women: theatre, opera, music Continuing: #1day1woman ( year-long initiative) | Sports (year-long initiative) Announcements from other communities Join Wikipedia:26 for '26 and create or substantially improve twenty-six Wikipedia articles during the year 2026, at least one for each letter of the English alphabet. Tip of the month: Our redlists are a great resource, but not every redlinked subject is notable. Be sure to research before starting a new article. Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project. Follow us on social media: Instagram | Pinterest

--Lajmmoore (talk 22:46, 31 January 2026 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Welcome to Phase 2 of the January–February 2026 NPP drive. During Phase 1, we reviewed 16,658 articles and 4,416 redirects, and there is currently a backlog of 16,475 articles and 23,782 redirects in the queue. Fantastic job! Completing 22,502 patrols in the first phase made a significant dent in the backlog. Let's keep our foot on the gas for Phase 2, and I hope we can achieve even more reviews than Phase 1. Best of luck!

You are receiving this message because you added your name to the participants list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:21, 2 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

		The Original Barnstar
		For your work on Prominent individuals mentioned in the Epstein files, especially in protecting it from vandalism and BLP violations. Bearian (talk) 09:07, 6 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, though there should really be an Unoriginal Barnstar for this though. It's one of those articles that (while very much due) is asking for trouble, I think I just arrived first on the scene not much else. CNC (talk) 13:10, 6 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Why are you removing content from this article? Guz13 (talk) 18:50, 6 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war, according to the reverts you've made to Restore Britain. This means that you are repeatedly reverting content back to how you think it should be, despite knowing that other editors disagree. Once it is known that there is a disagreement, users are expected to collaborate with others, avoid editing disruptively, and try to reach a consensus – rather than repeatedly reverting the changes made by other users.

Important points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive behavior – regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not engage in edit warring – even if you believe that you are right.

You need to discuss the disagreement on the article's talk page and work towards a revision that represents consensus among everyone involved. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution if discussions reach an impasse. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to engage in edit warring, you may be blocked from editing. ~2025-42899-89 (talk) 19:08, 14 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

You unnecessarily removed an edit fixing capitalisation, though it was a minor edit, please exercise more discretion to avoid removing content from wikipedia without cause LachlanTheUmUlGiTurtle (talk) 14:43, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Restore_Britain&diff=prev&oldid=1338496735 LachlanTheUmUlGiTurtle (talk) 14:43, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

You're referring to the }{} error right? I know it looks like I did based on the restore function, but for whatever reason I didn't (maybe due to using visual editor negating that). That error wasn't introduced in the diff, nor does it remain in the article. My plan was to remove it after that restore, but it disappeared. Regards, CNC (talk) 14:49, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

No i mean the capitalisation, scroll down, on "Grooming" LachlanTheUmUlGiTurtle (talk) 14:52, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

That was intentional. Grooming gangs scandal isn't a capitalised term per MOS:CAPS, unless it's the topic title, or start of a sentence. Apologies for not clarifying rationale in the edit summary. CNC (talk) 14:55, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, sorry to bother you here, but I saw your response and assumed it would be better not to respond on the closure requests page.

Do you not think that if a subject keeps coming up for discussion, it should be settled to prevent future discussions? I think that RfC is a huge mess, because it looks like the way people interpreted the question changed somewhere along the way, meaning it is difficult to tell what they wanted, but does that not require some form of action? The dispute remains unsettled/unresolved this way. Slomo666 (talk) 11:47, 22 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

In an ideal scenario the previous RfC would have been properly closed, and maybe this would of prevented another. Regardless, any editor is welcome to request either RfC is formally closed, I just removed my request given it's been a month and no closure, previous unclosed RfC, and editor time being a precious resource. CNC (talk) 13:10, 22 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red | March 2026, Vol 12, Issue 3, Nos 358, 359, 364, 365, 366 Online events: March 1-31: Artists & Activists | Artworks by women | Alphabet run: countries starting with C Continuing (year-long initiatives): #1day1woman | Sports Announcements from other communities: Celebrate Women Unreferenced articles backlog drive Wiki Loves Ramadan Tip of the month: Those experiencing difficulties with new articles can follow the guidance in our essays, perhaps starting with our Ten Simple Rules. Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project. Follow us on social media: Instagram | Pinterest

--Rosiestep (talk) 09:27, 25 February 2026 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Sorry for this debacle. Hopefully I cleared things up but by now I hope it's clear I wasn't trying to throw any sorts of accusations around. Alexandraaaacs1989 (talk) 15:06, 25 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry forgot about your message, it's fine I didn't think you were making accusations as such, just disagreed with your argument. Probably I overreacted anyway, given with a relatively simple edit the situation seems to be resolved for now. CNC (talk) 14:11, 2 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red | April 2026, Vol 12, Issue 4, Nos 358, 359, 367, 368, 369 Online events: New: Countries starting with D, E and F | Women's Works: Written works | Cascading Women Continuing (year-long initiatives): #1day1woman | Sports Announcements from other communities: CEE women Tip of the month: When creating a new article, take a moment to ensure any notable woman is redlinked. Someone might be inspired to create an article for her. Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project. Follow us on social media: Instagram | Pinterest

--Chocmilk03 (talk) 20:13, 29 March 2026 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Hopefully this heads-up is taken constructively:

Please note that archive bots (or the talk header) can't understand m for months, as per [1]. (This has been fixed by replacing 3m with 90d).

Cheers CapnZapp (talk) 16:04, 30 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

My bad, I'll check to see there were any others I did like that. Thanks for fixing. CNC (talk) 16:12, 30 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

		The Invisible Barnstar
		This award is given in recognition of CommunityNotesContributor for accumulating at least 10 points in the January–February 2026 NPP backlog drive. Your contributions helped review 27,750 articles and 7,050 redirects during the drive. Thank you so much for taking part and helping reduce the backlog! – DreamRimmer ■ 16:48, 4 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

You are invited to participate in the Destubathon of the Americas, a contest/editathon which will run from May 1 to May 31. The goal is to destub as many of our 475,000+ stubs for the Americas (from Alaska down to Chile) as possible. A good chance to have fun in expanding many of our old stale stubs and win up to £2000 ($2680) in Amazon vouchers for expanding stub articles. Sign up in the Contestants/participants section on the contest page if interested. Even if not interested in prizes you are still warmly welcome to participate in it as an editathon! Hopefully we can achieve something significant in the month of May together! ♦ Dr. Blofeld 16:49, 15 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]