User talk:ApprenticeFan

When I'm going to insert my conversations here, past discussions can be found on my archive.

How do you know that there will not be a US Senate special election in California?^{[citation needed]}

Because Alex Padilla is chosen to run in the 2022 US senate election for a full 6-year term. ApprenticeFan ^work 03:09, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• That doesn't mean he also won't run in a special election or that that won't be a special election. Please cite a reliable source in the article. Thanks. —GoldRingChip 03:35, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in 2000 United States gubernatorial elections, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Shadowrvn728 (talk) 00:00, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

On 21 February 2021, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article 2021 Australian Open, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Stephen 23:48, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. Thanks! TheHotwiki (talk) 00:25, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Olympic torch relays, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fukui.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Stop making that text grey. Grey indicates unofficial races without specific articles. The Rambling Man (Stay alert! Control the virus! Save lives!!!!) 10:34, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your page move of 2020 BNP Paribas Open has created a mess. This was controversial as the event was canceled or postponed depending on the source. Fyunck(click) (talk) 04:06, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on 2020 BNP Paribas Open requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

This page was today moved without discussion, please move back. I don't think it was vandalism, just an error or something that needs discussing

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Fyunck(click) (talk) 04:11, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey ApprenticeFan, While I believe what you're saying, I'm just wondering if you have (and can cite) references for main draw withdrawals, protected rankings etc? Thanks in advance. Tobyjamesaus (talk) 09:43, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. Thanks! Qwerty284651 (talk) 15:34, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Good job with the qualification list. I just wanted to know what criteria are you using for declaring that a player has qualified, because I believe that a lot more of men tennis players are already qualified, since they cannot be surpassed by enough players in order to be out of the 56 ranked places of qualification. Also, it may be detrimental to discard at this stage players under criteria B (like Paula Badosa in women's singles as an example) since they could still get dispensation to play. Cristóbalrguacl (talk) 15:25, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

2020–21 United States network television schedule

added a link pointing to United States Olympic Trials

Tennis at the 2020 Summer Olympics – Qualification

added a link pointing to James Duckworth

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:54, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I am confused why you continually put in incorrect information into the continental qualifiers. Take it to the talk tab please. It is explained there, and in the edit summaries multiple times, why you are wrong. Can you please at least try to communicate why you are doing this.18abruce (talk) 11:29, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

How do you know that Andy Murray is using the protected ranking?18abruce (talk) 23:27, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please add sources for some of your claims on this page. Sebastian Korda, Aljaz Bedene, Nick Kyrgios, and others need to be fixed.18abruce (talk) 02:08, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Enough is enough, explain what your doing or it is going to be vandalism.18abruce (talk) 01:50, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry for this and I don't give any shit with remarks on ITF dispensation permissions of players to receive by sporting govern body: Petra Martic (Croatia), Paula Badosa (Spain), Patricia Maria Tig (Romania) and Polona Hercog (Slovenia). It's the NOC's decision to enter this appeal. ApprenticeWiki work 01:52, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ApprenticeFan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)

---

Request reason:

I would let to unblock this IP address 124.6.179.51 (talk · contribs · IP contribs · WHOIS), giving as a free IP exemption to let editing on my work in Wiki. Reason this address was blocked for 72 hours by User:Zzuuzz. Please I would grant this request to exempt this IP edit.

Decline reason:

Considering the edits on that IP, and that you are the only person to have used that IP, no. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 17:00, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I'm confused as to how there's vandalism coming from that IP address. Can you elaborate? Other reviewing admins, you are free to immediately take whatever action you think appropriate here. --Yamla (talk) 13:20, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Abusive IP editing caused my real life mental behavior problems. But my account goes behave well even no historical vandalism incidents. ApprenticeWiki work 13:23, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I believe you are indicating that you were the person behind the vandalism from that IP address. Blocks apply to the person, not just the account, so you'll need to sit out the block. --Yamla (talk) 14:08, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

What do I mean? My account did an IP block exempt in July 2009 and it was totally doing fine. I request this ApprenticeFan account needs a full IP block exemption. ApprenticeWiki work 14:18, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'll ask you directly, so there's no confusion. Did you make these edits? --Yamla (talk) 14:47, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2020–21 United States network television schedule, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page United States Olympic Trials.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:55, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

To @ApprenticeFan:,

Early last month, I did the work of changing and updating the American Idol articles and its colors and I had done them while because I have my time available because of an week-off from a hectic schedule I had prior to the editing, and I know that I wasn't that perfect, but I acknowledge some of the edits and I came to finish the job while you are busy. I'm also didn't aware that you are no longer a fan of The Apprentice (that time was due to some help but I still did myself) due to the name moniker and you prefer to stick to the name as it is because you prefer that way (and I will not mention that ever again). Now that everything has set aside, I think we should consider things settled and we should resolve the matter in the nicest way possible? I won't ask the same question again but I will be happy to help out in the future because we do share the interest of television, just to let you know. I guess we could let this slide and consider this as helping one another?

Please do reply once you see it because as an acknowledgement. Thank you. TVSGuy (talk) 15:38, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, there. I was wondering where did you acquire the order of play for day 1 for the 2021 Wimbledon championships? As in where did you find the pdf file, that you used as a schedule of play link in day-by-day summaries? Qwerty284651 (talk) 10:29, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

At the Wimbledon website and is located at scores and schedule section. ApprenticeWiki work 11:13, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Equestrians at the 2020 Summer Olympics indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:13, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Tennis players at the 2020 Summer Olympics indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:18, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There are 236 athletes participating in the 2020 Tokyo Olympic Games in South Korea, not 208. Can you correct it? I am not authorized to amend the document. Please refer to it. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/South_Korea_at_the_2020_Summer_Olympics

Thank you. Folley89 (talk) 04:44, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I understand why some players have multiple collections of points dropping, but why do some players have multiple collections of points adding to their score for week of 2021 BNP Paribas? Surely for that fortnight that’s the only tournament they’re going to be able to add points? I’m curious. If you could explain (in the article or here) that would be super. Thanks. Tobyjamesaus (talk) 12:04, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Because the 2019 points had already reduced by 50 percent, but the ladies points will remain till November 8 as in case, it will be dropped including the tournaments were held in 2019 but did not hold this year including Asia. ApprenticeWiki work 12:08, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for your response. I understand the dropping points; it’s really clearly written in the article itself. My question is points won. It’s not clear how/why some players add multiple scores. Ie. Rublev. 10+90. I assume 10 is from the tournament itself and subject to change but from what is he adding an extra 90? Another case, Sonego 10+13? Another case Khachanov? Etc

If you could explain multiple points won? That would be awesome. Thanks Tobyjamesaus (talk) 06:09, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• • Hi User:ApprenticeFan, not sure if you got my response from 14 September. If you don't know the answer to the question, that's fine, just let me know and I can ask someone else. Thanks.Tobyjamesaus (talk) 10:27, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ApprenticeFan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)

---

Request reason:

Caught by an open proxy block but this host or IP is not an open proxy. My IP address is 120.28.64.61. Trying to edit some new information in relevant articles like reality shows, tennis events and beauty pageants. ApprenticeWiki work 13:39, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Confirmed proxy. Yamla (talk) 14:11, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hi there,

I got tagged in a change you posted on Survivor: Fans vs. Survivors (Israeli season); could you explain the vandalism you found that prompted the revert? I just want to know if I did something wrong.

Thanks,

~ A. ~ Anna (@AnnaLikesHistory) (talk) 06:25, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The one thing your post has found out with too many redlinks being non-notable. ApprenticeWiki work 07:45, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, thanks for telling me. I always saw red links on different articles; I assumed it was so people knew what articles needed to be created? Should I re-suggest the edit without adding links that aren't already made?

~A. ~ Anna (@AnnaLikesHistory) (talk) 18:21, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The navigation box you keep edit-warring on is not for colour-coding to impart masses of information, it's a navigation box and allows people to navigate to specific year article. A specific year article exists for the race cancelled due to COVID, so please stop making it appear grey, which in UI design means "unavailable". It is available. The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 06:44, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry for editing as events have not held in any circumstances such as cancellation should have been in grey. I don't get any disruptive violations on my edits. ApprenticeWiki work 07:47, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No, this is a navigation template, aimed to help people navigate to the right articles. Making it look grey implies no such article exists. Stop doing this now. The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 08:07, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok and I won't do it again. I won't be getting conflicts to be caused by edit war that I will make a proper civil and respect with the articles between published sources. ApprenticeWiki work 12:21, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:00, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ApprenticeFan

Thank you for creating 2022 Australian Open.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good start!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 16:22, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I've declined your speedy request there, and reverted the copy-paste move. As the author of the content of the draft you're free to copy any or all of it into that mainspace page; if you like, you can add something like "some stuff I wrote earlier at Draft:Miss USA 2022" to your edit summary. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 16:49, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Miss USA 2022. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 05:09, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Thank you for making the results map for Miss Universe 2021, I just had two things about it. Is there any way you could separate Northern Ireland from Great Britain in the results? The highlight for Great Britain is currently representing the United Kingdom, while Northern Ireland competes as part of Ireland at Miss Universe since it is Miss Great Britain and not Miss United Kingdom. Secondly, could you change "Top 11" to "Top 16" in the results key? I would change these all myself but I don't know how to work with these maps. Thanks! { [ ( jjj 1238 ) ] } 11:33, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Northern Ireland is part of the United Kingdom (as Great Britain) but unlike Miss World has England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland competing separately. ApprenticeWiki work 11:37, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Great Britain and the United Kingdom are not the same thing. Great Britain refers to Scotland, Wales, and England, while the United Kingdom includes Northern Ireland. In Miss Universe, Northern Ireland competes with Ireland, as you can the Irish representatives from both 2021 and 2020 were from Belfast in Northern Ireland. Also, could you please ping me with your responses here so I know when you answer? { [ ( jjj 1238 ) ] } 11:45, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft, as written, does not appear to indicate that the appropriate notability criterion is satisfied. In particular, this draft does not appear to indicate that WP:GNG is satisfied. If one of the criteria is satisfied, please revise this draft appropriately, with a reliable source, if necessary stating on the talk page or in AFC comments which criterion is met, and resubmit. It is the responsibility of the submitter to show that a subject satisfies a notability criterion.

You may ask for advice about the notability criteria at the Teahouse.

In particular, see and refer to WP:GNG for notability, which is the guideline that the subject should be evaluated against.

There is not enough information in this draft to warrant an article for the year.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Miss USA 2022 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Miss USA 2022, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 04:29, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ApprenticeFan! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 04:29, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Miss USA 2022. Thanks! Slywriter (talk) 21:05, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please be aware that your signature uses deprecated <font> tags, which are causing Obsolete HTML tags lint errors. As explained at WP:SIGFONT:

<font>...</font> tags were deprecated in HTML4 and are entirely obsolete in HTML5. This means that the popular browsers may drop support for them at some point. Wikipedia is already preparing for this by delinting code project-wide through Linter. When support finally is dropped, the tags will be ignored in all signatures; any properties such as color and font family will revert to their default values. For this reason, it is recommended that you use <span>...</span> tags and CSS properties instead.

I have prepared a replacement signature string for you. You are encouraged to change

[[User:ApprenticeFan|<span style="color:indigo;">'''ApprenticeWiki'''</span>]] [[:Special:Contributions/ApprenticeFan|<span style="color:#919191;font-size:85%;">'''''work'''''</span>]] : ApprenticeWiki work

to

[[User:ApprenticeFan|<b style="color:indigo">ApprenticeWiki</b>]] <span style="font-size:85%;">[[:Special:Contributions/ApprenticeFan|<b style="color:#919191">''work''</b>]]</span> : ApprenticeWiki work

—Anomalocaris (talk) 04:09, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. It would be great to replace. ApprenticeWiki work 05:04, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

In case you don't know how to update your signature, you do this by clicking on "preferences" in the top menu, and then in the first tab, which is selected by default, copy into the field marked "Signature" the above markup and check the box marked "Treat the above as wiki markup ..." —Anomalocaris (talk) 02:07, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I know that as I did it around in May/June 2021. ApprenticeWiki ^work 03:27, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Whatever you did then, your signature remains with the obsolete <font>...</font> tags. —Anomalocaris (talk) 02:18, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to The Amazing Race 33, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 00:47, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2005 Australian Open – Men's Singles, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chris Guccione.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:54, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:2022 BNP Paribas Open – Men's singles🙂 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gravure9 (talk • contribs) 01:19, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at The Amazing Race Canada 7. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 03:04, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at The Amazing Race 33, you may be blocked from editing. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 16:54, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on sports into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 01:00, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited So You Think You Can Dance (American season 17), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hollywood.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Survivor 41. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 01:09, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am so sorry that I won't do it again without further summary explanation. I will be politely making edits next time (especially to/with Bgsu98 (talk · contribs · count · logs · email)). ApprenticeWiki ^work 01:13, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

May 10th comments for AP.FAN....thanks for fixing location of Miss Wisconsin-USA pageant..held in Middleton not Madison....but Hollis Celeste Brown is now 26 years old...and she uses her full name like 2021 winner Samantha Catherine Keaton...its Hollis Celeste Brown, 26, of Milwaukee/Savannah,Georgia..(put both cities as how 2020 and 1989 has two hometown cities).....and why do you control our Wisconsin state pageant Wikipedia page when you are not even in Wisconsin....lock it up so that no one can make corrections or clarifications? Again fix full name and her age and hometown for 2022. see story here---as if you need confirmation of what I refer.....full name and hometown as Savannah, Georgia when she won the Miss Black Virginia USA title in 2019..any questions/comments email me.......statepageants@gmail.com....thanks: http://menafn.com/1098178504/Hollis-C-Brown-Named-2019-Miss-Black-Virginia-USA

— Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.33.130.2 (talk) 19:09, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply] 

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Template:Survivor (American TV series), did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 03:29, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, 2022 French Open – Women's singles qualifying, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. scope_creep^Talk 12:50, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Is this information important? If so, why not add it with a proper source instead of hidden text? It seems odd to me. Cheers, SVTCobra 02:57, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at 2022 Winter Olympics. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 03:17, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm User:Canny Yeohmanly. I invite you to edit List of Miss Supranational countries page, because I see many of your contributions to editing articles related to beauty pageants. The page table has not been updated to the last version, after the Miss Supranational 2022 competition. Hope your contribution can help--Canny Yeohmanly (talk) 08:58, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

On the map for TAR Canada 8, Akimiski Island is coloured in when it should not be; it is part of Nunavut, which was not visited. 96.48.233.241 (talk) 03:36, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for adding the contestants table to The Amazing Race 33. I took the liberty of making just a few modifications. The red background looked very harsh for the four contestants who couldn't resume the race, so I replaced it with a more neutral gray. Bgsu98 (talk) 16:28, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Just a reminder that your signature contains obsolete font tags. They create Linter errors, and it is advised that you change your signature to [[User:ApprenticeFan|<span style="color:indigo;">'''ApprenticeWiki'''</span>]] [[:Special:Contributions/ApprenticeFan|<sup style="color:#919191;">'''''work'''''</sup>]] ASAP.

The purpose of this message is because Linter errors affect the way the page looks, and with a lot of errors, the page may render badly. To reduce Linter errors, please change your signature.

If the software doesn't accept my replacement signature, let me know, and if that's the case, unfortunately you may have to change it to something else. Sheep (talk) 20:26, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, your signature's not changed.

<font>...</font> tags were deprecated in HTML4 and are entirely obsolete in HTML5. This means that the popular browsers may drop support for them at some point. Wikipedia is already preparing for this by delinting code project-wide through Linter. When support is finally dropped, the tags will be ignored in all signatures; any properties such as color and font family will revert to their default values. For this reason, it is recommended that you use <span>...</span> tags and CSS properties instead. For usage examples, see Wikipedia:Signature tutorial § Real-life examples.

It would be appreciated if you can change your signature to the one above. Thanks. Sheep (talk) 12:45, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

OK and done. Sorry for your appreciation and it works properly. It's now fixed. Font via code replaced by span. ApprenticeWiki ^contribs 12:49, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Bachelorette (Australian season 1), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Michael Turnbull.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for all of your work in helping to make the Amazing Race articles so good! Bgsu98 (talk) 16:31, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. As my sig is fixed with code fixes. ApprenticeWiki ^contribs 12:23, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Romance Aspiration and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 24#Romance Aspiration until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Pizzaplayer219^Talk_Contribs 18:55, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Knowledge Aspiration and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 24#Knowledge Aspiration until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Pizzaplayer219^Talk_Contribs 18:55, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I don't personally think the Express Pass needs to be reflected in the results table, but I could see someone wanting to quickly check to see what leg a team used their Express Pass on, rather than have to scroll through the episode summaries. However, the orange is not a suitable color, per MOS:ONWHITE. I have gone ahead and switched to purple, which is on the list of suitable colors. Please check out this table: The Amazing Race 17#Results to see how it looks, and I will continue to switch over to purple as I edit these seasons. Bgsu98 (Talk) 23:34, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, 2023 Tata Open Maharashtra, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. echidnaLives - talk - edits 09:01, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year!

ApprenticeFan,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
— Moops ^⋠T⋡ 05:07, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

— Moops ^⋠T⋡ 05:07, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Cpotisch (talk) 09:08, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

These edits ([1], [2], [3], [4], [5]) had atrocious grammar and spelling issues, while these edits included wholly unsourced changes to content ([6] [7] [8]). These are just a tiny, tiny sample of the many edits you have made in the past week alone that have been littered with these issues. You have also been warned about this numerous times ([9], [10], [11][12]). It would also appear, per this past revision of your talk page, that you were in fact blocked for this issue. Please screen your edits for grammatical errors before publishing them, and make sure that they are well-sourced. Remember that competence is required to edit Wikipedia. Cpotisch (talk) 09:24, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am very sorry that I did not know what I have happened. English is not my first language although I am understood it that I memorize any English words. I hate to get warned and I have never blocked on Wikipedia before. ApprenticeWiki ^contribs 11:25, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I understand that English isn’t your primary language, but that doesn’t change the fact that you need to be able to write grammatically correct sentences to edit the English Wikipedia. Also, you absolutely have been blocked in the past (here and here) so don’t be dishonest. Cpotisch (talk) 18:50, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Both are IP addresses, the account in itself hasn't been blocked [13]. I have also been frustrated with the lack of competence from this editor. I think its about time this is addressed. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 01:47, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Definitely let me know if you see further disruptive edits and/or want to take it to ANI. I’ll back you up. Cpotisch (talk) 01:50, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Tennis § ITF Men's/Women's World Tennis Tour. Timothytyy (talk) 10:33, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Cpotisch (talk) 18:38, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Have to say this is the third report has made in WP:ANI, the first was in 2009 and the second was in 2015. I don't have any edit violations. ApprenticeWiki ^contribs 01:36, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ApprenticeFan. Thank you for your work on 2023 Australian Open – Mixed doubles. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating this article! Keep writing!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 07:13, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop vandalizing List of United States senators from Nebraska and List of current United States senators Ricketts Has not being sworn in yet and its vacant If you continue to revert edit before January 23, 2023 you may be blocked from editing Please revert edit before January 23, 2023.

2603:8001:2902:64F4:D001:F21B:3348:4F6E (talk) 09:14, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Cpotisch (talk) 08:44, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at The Bachelor (American season 27). Your command of English is not strong enough to add text in English Wikipedia. This is being discussed at ANI, as you know. While that discussion was going on, you edited the article in the exact same manner that was reported to ANI. Please do not add text to Wikipedia articles in English. bonadea contributions talk 11:08, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry that I did not really disrupt plot summary. I was able to have my summarized on the first episode of The Bachelor. ApprenticeWiki ^contribs 11:11, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your response here is not possible to understand. The plot summary you added (and restored after it had been removed by me) is not possible to understand. I do not think that you want to be disruptive. But editing articles to add text that is impossible to understand is disruptive. --bonadea contributions talk 11:37, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I don't really understand what I have did. I don't violate my edits through the plot summary rules that would be a proper Wikipedian. Survivor, The Amazing Race and Big Brother have good episode summaries. I hate going suspended to make with assume good faith. ApprenticeWiki ^contribs 11:39, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Bonadea: can you back me up at ANI, where I've raised these concerns. I see no reason why this user can be trusted to keep editing. Cpotisch (talk) 13:17, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.   Salvio ^giuliano 14:00, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is the privilege to have my account needed to be unblocked until I would resume my editing:

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ApprenticeFan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)

---

Request reason:

I have been blocked by Salvio giuliano (talk · contribs) to make my privileges to continue editing in Wikipedia. I am an active user for almost 18 years and had never been blocked before. I will make civil and please let unblock my account to continue my contributions that I use to. I am totally frustrated for NOW. ApprenticeWiki ^contribs 14:04, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Wow, WP:TOOSOON. This doesn't come close to addressing the demonstrated WP:CIR concerns. It's unlikely you'll be unblocked until you demonstrate a substantial number of edits on a different wiki. Those edits should be in English and should consist of several hundred edits over at least six months. Be warned, the strong belief is that you are currently not capable of doing so. No offense intended, it's just that your demonstrated ability to communicate in English is simply not strong enough at this time. Yamla (talk) 14:07, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I have to agree with Yamla. Your unblock request demonstrates some of the core reasons why you were blocked: severe grammatical errors. With all respect, your English is so bad that your editing was far more frustrating to everybody else who had to clean up your messes that your block is to you. We have to go with the greater good and what is best for Wikipedia. Until you can demonstrate better skill in English, the community will almost certainly keep your account blocked. —C.Fred (talk) 14:12, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ApprenticeFan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)

---

Request reason:

It is been not more than 10 minutes I was disabled my editing. I didn't do vandalism, I never took sock puppetry. I hate to stay I am not a bad person. I hate being warned that I don't violate edit war.

My usual contributions that I edit are Grand Slam (tennis), beauty pageants and reality television.

ApprenticeFan is my one and only account in Wikipedia. Can I create another one if possible that my current account gets blocked? ApprenticeWiki ^contribs 14:16, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

No, most certainly not. You must not create another account. See WP:SOCK and WP:EVADE. You are blocked. You personally. Until the block on this account is lifted, you are not permitted to edit Wikipedia. --Yamla (talk) 14:17, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Sorry Yamla, I forgot to add the {{unblock}} template that I have editing contributions to do. ApprenticeWiki ^contribs 14:19, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You will not be unblocked at this time. Do not bother with another {{unblock}} request, it'll just waste everyone's time. --Yamla (talk) 14:22, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

To be honest, after several months of reverting their edits, I wouldn't object to seeing a couple more appeals, just for entertainment purposes. Cpotisch (talk) 14:24, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What happens if I will create my second account despite my current account is blocked? I hate boring time in Wikipedia. ApprenticeWiki ^contribs 14:24, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It will be blocked and any contributions will be thrown away, and you'll make it basically impossible that this account would ever be unblocked. Do not do this. It's really, really, really bad that you are even suggesting this. --Yamla (talk) 14:26, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

My other Wiki accounts (Commons, Wikiquote) have never blocked those in addition with the English Wikipedia. I have no problems with editing as grammatical errors made certain mistakes. I would never contribute at Tagalog Wikipedia, my first language I have no history of edits. This has been the biggest mistake in my Wikipedia life. ApprenticeWiki ^contribs 14:31, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You are only blocked on this project, en.wikipedia. Assuming you are not blocked on those separate projects, you are welcome to edit there. Please reread WP:BLOCK. --Yamla (talk) 14:33, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you won't contribute there, then you won't contribute anywhere. Why do you refuse to accept that your grasp of English is not strong enough to edit? Dozens of people have explained this to you, and there's literally no shame in it. I couldn't write anything in Tagalog, and that's fine. Just make content that you are capable of making. Cpotisch (talk) 14:34, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I would have to say many friendly editors checking the edits that I couldn't grasp a lot with it. My current account is blocked, I would be sure to create a second account preventing from blocking in the future. Paging Masem (talk · contribs) and Bgsu98 (talk · contribs) for the reality TV community. I would make help to improve my English skills better. ApprenticeWiki ^contribs 14:40, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is deeply inappropriate. --Yamla (talk) 14:45, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Yamla: My articles which I need to edit are: 2023 Australian Open, 2023 WTA Tour, 2023 ATP Tour (those two for entry list players), Miss USA 2023 (state pageants scheduled from September 2022 to April 2023), Miss North Carolina USA and The Bachelor (American season 27). The latter needs to add the first episode summary that I use to after I watch every episode. ApprenticeWiki ^contribs 14:48, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No. Stop wasting our time. --Yamla (talk) 14:49, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Yamla: What does it mean? I regular contribute and edit those articles for such like Miss Alabama USA 2023 is scheduled to be held this weekend with the new titleholder is going to be crowned. Paging @Bri.public to give editing on behalf of me despite getting blocked. ApprenticeWiki ^contribs 14:52, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is my last reply to you. You are blocked. You will not edit anything on en.wikipedia. WP:BLOCK goes into more detail. I will not respond any further to you. Do not ping me again. --Yamla (talk) 14:53, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

OK and I will re-read with WP:BLOCK policy before getting another {{unblock}} request. Good night and see you tomorrow to improve my English skills. ApprenticeWiki ^contribs 14:55, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

We will figure out which account it is and block it. You as an individual do not have the right to make edits. Know that if you try to get around that, you are breaking Wikipedia policy, and we don't enjoy that fact. Cpotisch (talk) 14:27, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ApprenticeFan, the only blocked account is en.wikipedia. Had never been blocked 18 years I have been made my first edit (April 2005). ApprenticeWiki ^contribs 14:45, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Honestly this is a hilarious reply. Your editing was disabled because you are blocked; that is the definition of "blocked". The fact that you don't know that is once again an indictment of your language difficulties. Furthermore, no one accused you of sockpuppetry, yet here you are literally voicing your intention to do sock puppetry. And the very fact that it's only been 10 minutes is part of why you almost certainly will not get unblocked. Cpotisch (talk) 14:20, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It's been an hour being blocked. When I read with BLOCK policy, I would have to understand with the five pillars for now. ApprenticeWiki ^contribs 14:59, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The fact that you apparently can not understand a single word we tell you is very frustrating, and a perfect example of why you do not have the capacity to be productive here. I want you to know that what you said in this reply is pretty close to illegible. Accept that fact and move on. Cpotisch (talk) 15:12, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I will give a grant for the {{unblock}} request once the issues are settled to resolve. Good night and see you tomorrow. ApprenticeWiki ^contribs 15:14, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You won't "grant" anything. You have no power here. Cpotisch (talk) 15:16, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You cannot expect for a block to only last an hour. That would be pointless. Also, you have repeatedly stated your desire to break the rules- that would only result in further, even longer-lasting punishment. I am truly not trying to be rude, but it would be very obvious to people if a sock account was yours as your grammar is near incomprehensible in a very unique way. Rhayailaina (talk) 07:45, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@User:Cpotisch, User:C.Fred: here was my edit in The Bachelor (American season 27) before was removed by User:Bonadea:

No one wants the edits for the episode summaries that in dire need of television plot summary for the premiere episode, paging Gthesecond to add the summaries from now in addition to myself. ApprenticeWiki ^contribs 15:10, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is one of the worst edits I've ever seen hope and I'm glad it was removed. Cpotisch (talk) 15:13, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• You are repeatedly wasting other people's time and so I have revoked your talk page access. Please read WP:UTRS for your options going forward. Cullen328 (talk) 17:35, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry for randomly chiming in, but can you please keep your enwiki nonsense to the English Wikipedia only? Taking enwiki issues to other WMF projects in the form of vandalism in mainspace is not acceptable, though I guess your blocks on 9 other wikis should reflect this. Anyway, you're set to be globally locked soon. --SHB2000 (talk) 07:57, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

is closed. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 00:45, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your email. I have placed your retirement notice on your user page as you requested in your email. Accounts cannot be deleted for both legal and technical reasons. The category you requested is not accurate because you are blocked but not banned. I encourage you to consider editing the Tagalog Wikipedia instead, where you are likely to encounter fewer problems. Good luck in your future ventures. I wish you well. Cullen328 (talk) 02:10, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Krista White is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Krista White (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 03:26, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

He’s indeffed just so you know. Cpotisch (talk) 03:40, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

is closed. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:37, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:The Amazing Race (American TV series) contestants has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. --woodensuperman 14:43, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:The Amazing Race Canada contestants has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. --woodensuperman 09:49, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Bgsu98 (Talk) 01:25, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ApprenticeFan. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Tennis at the 2024 Summer Olympics – Qualification, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:02, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ApprenticeFan. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Tennis at the 2024 Summer Olympics – Qualification".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:53, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is a new requested move discussion in progress for the Charles III article. Since you participated in the previous discussion, I thought you might like to know about this one. Cheers. Rreagan007 (talk) 06:27, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article World's Strictest Parents (American TV series) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 12:11, 4 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]