User talk:AlphaCore

Welcome to my talk page! Hello! Please leave a new message. I will respond to your message as soon as possible. Thanks and happy editing! Also take care of the following points: If I left you a message; please answer on your talk page, using {{ping|Username}}, {{reply to|Username}} or {{u|Username}} in your response, or add {{talkback|Username}} or {{whisperback|Username}} to my talk page. And if you leave me a message; I will answer on my talk page, using {{ping|Username}} or {{u|Username}} in my response, or add {{talkback|Username}} or {{whisperback|Username}} to your talk page. Please post your new topic at the bottom of this page or at the bottom of the respective section, and use a new ==Descriptive heading== for new topics. Indent your comment when replying by using an appropriate number of colons ":" Sign and date your entry by inserting four tildes "~~~~" at the end of your message. I will generally respond here to comments that are posted here, rather than replying via your talk page (or the article talk page, if you are writing to me here about an article), so you may want to watch this page until you are responded to, or specifically let me know where you'd prefer the reply. Avoid personal attacks, do not troll or use this page as a chat room. Please, always assume good faith. If the topic is something personal, please email me and leave {{ygm}} on my talk page. And if you are impressed by my contributions, consider giving me some WikiLove. ⇒Start a new topic⇐

		The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
		This is awarded to AlphaCore for accumulating more than 168 points during the December 2025 AfC backlog drive. Your dedication and contributions to Wikipedia's content review process were crucial in reviewing over 9,000 drafts during the drive. Thank you for your participation and helping to reduce the backlog! ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 15:36, 11 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Bunnypranav

Thank you:) AlphaCore talk 16:05, 11 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

		The Articles for Creation Barnstar 2025 Top Editor
		In 2025 you were one of the top AfC editors, thank you! --Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 18:04, 21 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Archives

Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3

This page has archives. Topics inactive for 30 days are automatically archived 1 or more at a time by Lowercase sigmabot III if there are more than 5.

May I know what is your authority in deciding on why submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article? I am perplexed with your unwelcome interference and monopoly on deciding. These are published news articles. I will update the references and re-submit but I do not want you to message me.Burntonion (talk) 11:50, 21 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Burntonion Well, It’s not just about the reference. For a released film we need at least two critical reviews in ‘reliable sources’. Even though some of your are references reliable, as per the film notability WP:NFILM, at least two reviews needed. Check the decline comment on the draft that I left.

Also refer WP:ICTFSOURCES to check reliability of common references.

Once it’s addressed, resubmit. Happy editing! AlphaCore talk 11:59, 21 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

whatever, it looks like a deliberate attempt to move all articles to draft space wasting everybody's time. Articles develop over time we need to give some space to editors. This rotating scenario feel like unhappy editing ! and kindly dont post guidelines after every line. This isnt a classroom. The first draft by me is notable. Period Burntonion (talk) 12:03, 21 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Burntonion If an article is not ready yet in mainspace, it would be moved to the draft space or will go through AfD.

I strongly suggest you to read and refer corresponding guidelines and reviewers comments. Address the issue and work on it. Your article is still in draft space for the reason I mentioned above. It it was a non notable subject I would have gone through WP:AFD. AlphaCore talk 16:09, 21 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

I have revised and improved the draft Draft: Vanchinathan T by making the content more neutral and encyclopedic.

All the information and details provided in the draft are accurate and based on verifiable sources to the best of my knowledge.

At present, there are limited independent sources that focus directly on Vanchinathan T. However, I have added two additional reliable news sources that mention major investments by his companies (Jeanuvs and Yeemak) in Tamil Nadu, which are closely related to his professional work and public impact.

These sources highlight large-scale industrial and defence-related investments that contribute to regional development.

I kindly request you to review the updated draft and let me know if further improvements or sources are required.

Thank you for your time and guidance.

Kind regards Fenoferra (talk) 05:15, 9 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi AlphaCore, thank you for reviewing Draft:Presolv360. I am a paid editor and have disclosed this on my user page per WP:PAID. I have rewritten the draft significantly to remove promotional language. Could you point to specific sentences that still read as promotional so I can address them precisely? Legalwiki123 (talk) 09:33, 16 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Legalwiki123 Hi, I see that you have disclosed your interest. Refer WP:NPOV for writing in a neutral point of view and adding from and citing reliable sources, WP:RS.

refer WP:YFA for getting a better idea of writing for the first time.

Once you think all set to go for a review, hit the submit and wait for other reviewers. Happy editing.! AlphaCore talk 23:35, 16 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Please advise on the Draft:Rajeev Bhattacharyya as you reviewed one of his book here. I don't have much information about him but in my faith, he passes WP:AUTHOR criteria.

Kindly suggest me if I can add or remove something more. SatnaamIN (talk) 07:35, 20 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi AlphaCore! I have significantly revised the draft for Sagi Sree Hari Varma following your feedback on independent coverage. I have removed the local/brief mentions (AInvest, Coastal Times) and focused the article on five feature-length biographical profiles from The Hindu, Eenadu, and Sakshi, which provide the independent analysis and detail required by WP:BIO.

I have also added a recent 2026 recognition from the Indian Panorama International Film Festival and included an External links section with IMDb and an official website for verification. Could you please re-evaluate the draft for notability based on these national-level secondary sources? Thank you for your time and guidance Hv2567 (talk) 18:20, 26 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]