User talk:RscprinterBot

Post a message here to report any false positives.

Archives

1, 2, 3

This page has archives. Topics inactive for 90 days are automatically archived by ClueBot III if there are more than 5.

Edit 1007542924 diff results in a borked archive, slicing through a section instead of archiving the entire section.

Source:

Line 347

*Target of redirect: [[HX1]]
*Reason: {{tl|R from modification}}

etc...

Result:

Line 252

*Target of redirect: [[HX1]]
*Reason: {{tl|R from mo

This left the existing {{afc-c|a}} but removed the closing {{afc-c|b}}, resulting in the entire rest of the page hidden behind the afc closure. It also removed the timestamp from that section.

I've reclosed the section, with the last timestamp date tag added (without the sig).

-- 65.93.183.33 (talk) 00:09, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Rscprinter123, The bot archived an unclosed section here (top section). ― Qwerfjkltalk 20:14, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fix ping @Rcsprinter123. ― Qwerfjkltalk 20:19, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oh dear. That's one to look into. Thank you Qwerfjkl. Rcsprinter123 (interview) 21:09, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your latest archival (2022-07-07) of Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Redirects and categories resulted in at least one open Category-for-Creation being archived. Please review. SamuelRiv (talk) 14:18, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks SamuelRiv. Rcsprinter123 (palaver) 14:29, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

I was wondering, what frequency does task 8, archiving threads at Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Redirects and categories, run at? It looks a bit inconsistent, which I have no issue with, I'm just curious. Hey man im josh (talk) 00:14, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hey man im josh: It runs whenever I remember / have time to press the 'go' button, which can vary from about every 1 to 5 days. I try not to let AfC/R get too big. Rcsprinter123 (address) 10:36, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Can you press the button soon please? -MPGuy2824 (talk) 01:59, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hey @Rcsprinter123,

Based on the discusstion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Articles for creation#Increased Archival rate at Redirects creation, is it possible to implement a speedy archival process if {{AfC-c}} is used on a request, shortening it to maybe 3 days (i.e. "immediate archiving"). That would require an automated archival though. ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 12:06, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Rcsprinter123, I'm no expert in the area, but it seems like the bot has been running since approval in 2015, and hasn't seemed to have any problems? The only 3 times I found it mentioned in the AFC archive is when the page got long (presumably because of the manual archiving). Do you think it's possible to change this to an automated task instead of supervised? I'm sure you would need BAG approval, but a decade old bot with zero issues seems like a good thing to me! (please ping on reply) Happy Editing -- IAmChaos 21:17, 19 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made to Dadahu: you may already know about them, but you might find Wikipedia:Template index/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Thank you. Qrstw talk contribs 19:53, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Qrstw, the last revert the bot made on that page was 13 years ago; it may be a bit late.

You may want to spend more time on content. Qwerfjkltalk 22:07, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]