User:Ultimus

Thanks for taking the time to combine the list. I wish I had thought of that. Betaeleven 20:26, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the revert of 'Mirza Ghulam Ahmad'. Please keep it up. I have given the exact page references from the books written by Mirza himself. Its not a POV but a fact. Thanks again. VirtualEye 06:51, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

You've been approved to use VandalSniper. Please let me know if you have any problems getting it working. --Chris (talk) 01:03, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Ultra Vires (UofT newspaper), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. GreenJoe 20:02, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

I thought you might want to know. GreenJoe 22:40, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

This page still has a biased tone. I suggest a complete clean-up of this page.

I think the pictures at 18th century could all fit (none of them have good formatting) if they are organized a little better and resized. I could go ahead and do that now. I think a lot of IPs like adding in iconic art, and there is a lot to choose from. Ottava Rima (talk)

Apparently, a certain individual would rather own the page then allow changes that would improve formatting. That seems to be the common theme in Wikipedia now. Ottava Rima (talk) 21:23, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

why did you think you had the right to remove my adjunct to house music page? i explain clearly why it matters to mention this. did you not understand it. it is PERFECTLY in keeping with the page it simply adds a higher dimension to it a broader view

i cite

Although one could only look at the technical aspects of the music it would probably missing the point altogether

maybe you enjoy removing other people's efforts skull and bones indeed

the spirit of dance music

Although one could only look at the technical aspects of the music it would probably missing the point altogether. Dance is where the music went after Rock went mostly awry. Dance is technically the result of crossing disco and kraftwerk-type beats but what is the Spirit behind it.

It is sexual and spiritual in nature; hedonistic in its expression, a celebration of the body and its movement. Dance in many ways could be said to be tantric as it wants to relink the dancer to The Source. Think of tracks like I've got the power and Candi Statton and the Source .

Dance music is ecstatic and kundalini-driven. It is the stuff of the life force itself. It is almost always uplifting and although often chemically-fuelled it does not have to be.

One could look at shamanic dance traditions around the world and find similar ecstatic pursuits. Amazonian Indian Ayahuasca ceremonies are similar in many ways. The same can be found on the Tibetan and Siberian plateaux; ecstatic dance with a driven beat behind it.

To summarize one could say that dance music is a late 20th century urban shamanic attempt to relink man/woman to the Source; the Origin.

i would like to hear your rationale and next time please refrain

thanx shantiq —Preceding unsigned comment added by Shantiq (talk • contribs) 12:04, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:58, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Template:Monitor has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Anarchyte (talk • work) 08:46, 18 May 2020 (UTC)