Template talk:Computer architecture bit widths

This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Computer science This template is within the scope of WikiProject Computer science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Computer science related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer scienceWikipedia:WikiProject Computer scienceTemplate:WikiProject Computer scienceComputer science Things you can help WikiProject Computer science with: Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Article requests : Requested articles/Applied arts and sciences/Computer science, computing, and Internet Cleanup : Computer science articles needing attention Computer science articles needing expert attention Copyedit : Computing Expand : Computer science Infobox : Computer science articles without infoboxes Maintain : Timeline of computing 2020–present Photo : Find pictures for the biographies of computer scientists (see List of computer scientists) Computing articles needing images Stubs : Computer science stubs Unreferenced : WikiProject Computer science/Unreferenced BLPs Project-related : Tag all relevant articles in Category:Computer science and sub-categories with {{WikiProject Computer science}}

I saved this from the bottom of the template, as I'm not sure it is needed in this template?

! class="navbox-title" colspan="16" | Unit |- valign="top" | b || || B

Widefox (talk) 17:47, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

An alternate layout may be:

• vertical
• not include all bit widths - e.g. 1,2,4,8,16,32,64,128 (and leave for the existing bottom nav template that includes them all)
• non-aligned (as suggested by another editor, and as previously)

anyone? Widefox (talk) 18:15, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Open — Preceding unsigned comment added by 166.181.3.39 (talk)

Not done: Not going to happen. Codename Lisa (talk) 16:49, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

In this template there is no 30-bit category, instead it points to the article about the Univac 490. However there were a number of different 30-bit machines from Univac and not all of them were ISA compatabile.

For example the Univac 1104 (cut down from 36-bit 1103) and the Univac 1050 which was a variable word machine.

Also there was the RCA 4100 series of machines.

Dóeltenga (talk) 17:27, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Then there would need to be a "30-bit" or "30-bit computing" page, covering the 30-bit computers, to which to which "30" in the template would link. There is currently, as far as I know, no candidate for a page to which "30" could link. Guy Harris (talk) 07:57, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've create a draft page in last couple days for this, need to add references as of yet, but once I have I'll submit it for review.

User:Dóeltenga/30-bit computing

Dóeltenga (talk) 14:49, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]