Talk:Windows MultiPoint Server

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Microsoft Windows: Computing / Software High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Microsoft Windows, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Microsoft Windows on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Microsoft WindowsWikipedia:WikiProject Microsoft WindowsTemplate:WikiProject Microsoft WindowsMicrosoft Windows High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Computing (assessed as Mid-importance). This article is supported by WikiProject Software (assessed as High-importance).

This product is at least the magnitude of Windows Home Server or Windows 7 Enterprise. It can't just be described as a stub. Windows MultiPoint Server 2010 needs to be included and this article needs expansion.

The edition differences listed for 2011 is completely unsourced, and I've deleted them.Jasper Deng (talk) 21:58, 26 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, you always do that! Not there is a problem with this instance. (I think unreferenced information should often go, except when it is very easy to find source for them.) But your habit of deleting things (especially things that should not be deleted) is irritating. Fleet Command (talk) 06:43, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well, looks like this is a case in which you should have looked better because it was very easy to add references. Fleet Command (talk) 06:50, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This was very old. Notice that my editing habits have changed. However, do not attack me like that.Jasper Deng (talk) 21:34, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This could absolutely just be me, however I have noticed that the formatting of the first 3 subheadings is pretty...wonky?? The formatting for this article is "Windows MultiPoint Server [v], Released in [m] of [y]" when typically most pages on software-related articles include the release date inside the actual text. Again, could just be me losing my mind, but I doubt it. winisreallybored -- talk 16:14, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I went ahead and edited the page to make it less...odd winisreallybored -- talk 21:53, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]