Talk:Take Command Console

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software.

The content of Take Command (command line interpreter) was merged into Take Command Console on 24 December 2018. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. For the discussion at that location, see its talk page.

4NT gone?

By the looks of the current jpsoft.com site, it looks like 4NT has been replaced by a new version of Take Command, which includes a console version called Take Command Console. Not sure what should be done here - I'd suspect that this gets "former product" treatment and a new Take Command article gets created? 99.243.6.49 (talk) 18:37, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Take Command from v 1 to 8, is the product that is gone. 4NT is simply renamed TCC, and the package Take Command 9, 10 is a kind of TCI (tabbed command interface) + 4NT. The new Take Command follows the version numbers of the old one, and like the old TCMD, the version number is stepped to match the 4NT number. --Wendy.krieger (talk) 07:06, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I moved the article to Take Command Console (the 4NT page redirects to the new page) and edited it to include the former name and current TCC version information. That seems to me like the most effective way to address the change of product name. Wthrower (talk) 18:37, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Notability and third-party sources

As written, this is simply yet another product advertisement. Previous searches found no usable third-party sources. TEDickey (talk) 08:08, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A subsequent edit added for example a non-useful source as an example, which is basically cut/paste from the vendor's FAQ. Ironically, the change comment cited WP:IS 00:53, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

Proposed merge with 4DOS

The result of this discussion is no consensus. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:34, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

does not add any value being independent. Light2021 (talk) 01:02, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Merging the various articles on JP Software products is not a good idea at all. Although there is some redundancy, the products evolved into different directions and there's enough information that could be added which is only relevant to one of them. Discussing this all in a single article would cause a lot of confusion. --Matthiaspaul (talk) 23:08, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Merge "Take Command" 2 pages

The other page is purely promotional, lacking secondary sources. This page is ... light on sources, not much improvement. No more than one is needed. TEDickey (talk) 20:30, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Tedickey: Seems reasonable to me, although the text is so obtuse I find them both hard to follow. Given the abscence of objections I think that it would be reasonable to merge now. Klbrain (talk) 20:40, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It's not clear to me what's proposed. A merge with 4DOS has already been rejected above, and I agree with matthiaspaul's argument. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 02:20, 29 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Michael Bednarek: see the merge template at the topic of the article page, which is to merge Take Command (command line interpreter) into Take Command Console (April 2017 proposal). Klbrain (talk) 08:07, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for being thick – I should have looked overleaf. I agree that having two articles is unnecessary and to the proposed merge. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 11:24, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]