Talk:Solar controller

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Solar controller article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed Article policies Neutral point of view No original research Verifiability

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Energy Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

What is the scope of this article and the zero-carbon section? In particular, what is a "controller" here?

One might assume the "controller" to be the low power consumption device that controls a solar system, but does not perform a power-hungry role within it, such as being a circulation pump (and the presence of valves would be another question). This is the typical meaning of controller, when browsing product catalogues.

However this article describes a "zero-carbon controller". This would have to be taken as meaning a controller of a type distinct from the usual, so as to reduce some carbon emission from the usual type. The only way I can see a controller as having a measurable carbon footprint would be if the "controller" is assumed to include the circulation pump too. This is a somewhat different controller from the pure-control type. I am unaware of any marketing claims for a "zero carbon" controller that doesn't include a pump - to do so would be the worst sort of greenwashing, as the power consumption and thus carbon footprint of a pure-control device with modern electronics is truly trivial.

There is a pump-based controller on the UK market that is fairly well known, the Solartwin. This is sold on the basis of a claim to being "zero carbon" (I see this personally as true, albeit irrelevant) - carbon issues for the pump power are not at the forefront of my thoughts. The device is simple - a PV panel drives a pump. When the sun is out, the pump circulates. They are certainly simple and have a large number of happy users, so they're certainly a credible device. The drawback is that their panels are necessarily less efficient than good contemporary vacuum collectors.

To improve this article, and especially this section, we need to clarify what its scope is. Are there really pure-control devices selling themselves on the basis of being "zero carbon"? Is a system-level combined pump & controller like the Solartwin within this scope? Andy Dingley (talk) 16:05, 17 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I came to this article late after the title had been changed to "Solar controller" and I think I (and some editors before me) misinterpreted that title to mean SWH controllers in general, not just PV-powered controllers. After working on it (and renaming the zero-carbon controller section as PV-powered controller) I now realize that the original topic was a PV powered controller/pump combination, specifically Solartwin technology (even though there are other manufacturers of this type of equipment).

Now that I have this new understanding, I think we should merge salient parts of the PV-powered section into Solar water heating, where controllers and pumps are already covered pretty well, and delete this page. Jojalozzo 16:57, 20 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

One issue with solar controllers is whether they control mains powered solar heating pumps or PV powered ones. Another is whether the controllers are mains powered or PV powered themselves. Controllers control pumps and the power consumption of the pumps used in solar thermal systems is far from trivial, with research in UK showing that 40-80 kWh pa is common. Barry Johnston 13 March 2012. 79.123.65.62 (talk) 14:12, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Much of that content was removed around August 2011. Not IMHO an improvement. Andy Dingley (talk) 23:06, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Oppose merge – distinct subjects. Will expand and diverge further over time. Put the effort into growth, not consolidation. The Transhumanist 10:42, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Solar controller. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070630215238/http://www.dti.gov.uk/files/file16826.pdf to http://www.dti.gov.uk/files/file16826.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 04:56, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]