Talk:Single program, multiple data

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Computer science This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Computer science related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer scienceWikipedia:WikiProject Computer scienceTemplate:WikiProject Computer scienceComputer science ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Things you can help WikiProject Computer science with: Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Article requests : Requested articles/Applied arts and sciences/Computer science, computing, and Internet Cleanup : Computer science articles needing attention Computer science articles needing expert attention Copyedit : Computing Expand : Computer science Infobox : Computer science articles without infoboxes Maintain : Timeline of computing 2020–present Photo : Find pictures for the biographies of computer scientists (see List of computer scientists) Computing articles needing images Stubs : Computer science stubs Unreferenced : WikiProject Computer science/Unreferenced BLPs Project-related : Tag all relevant articles in Category:Computer science and sub-categories with {{WikiProject Computer science}}

Unlike SPMD, shared memory multiprocessing, also called symmetric multiprocessing

I guess should say:

Unlike distributed, shared memory multiprocessing, also called symmetric multiprocessing

No, SMP is typically not distributed. There used to be research into virtual shared memory on distributed systems, but I haven't heard about that anymore since the 90ies. 89.12.252.29 (talk) 06:18, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Does "Single Process, Multiple Data" really make sense? IMHO only "Single Program, Multiple Data" makes sense. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.182.235.84 (talk) 12:44, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it makes sense if you interpret Process as it is used in the Unix context: one address space in which many threads can run in parallel. But the term no longer appears in the page. 89.12.252.29 (talk) 06:18, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The external link to "Single Program Multiple Data stream" is broken. It is redirected to a new home page for Overture. But most of the documentation there is now in PDF format. I have not been able to fathom which part of the documentation the original link refers to. 89.12.252.29 (talk) 06:10, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I understand that the Frederica Darema citation is just that, a citation of her original definition. However, it seems to me that the "... but through synchronization directives ... self-schedule themselves" over-defines what SPMD should mean in the context of Flynn's taxonomy, where I think can just be something like "All processes start running the same program. They can independently diverge through control branches and operate on different data.". I don't think that if that is the case for a processor, but the processes do not have synchronization directives and/or inter-process self-scheduling it would not be SPMD. Maybe there could be a paragraph to make that clear. Tikayay (talk) 15:40, 28 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]