Talk:Serial comma

This article doesn't represent a worldwide view. Which other languages either prescribe or permit, and which prohibit, the use of the serial comma? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.192.197.247 (talk) 18:37, 10 July 2025 (UTC) That's exactly what I came to this article to find out. Can speakers of languages other than English contribute their knowledge? Snugglepuss (talk) 20:44, 10 September 2025 (UTC) There should be a discussion of the grammatical issues involved. If for instance you consider the first example, the presumably intended meaning is "Dedicated to my parents and Mother Teresa and the Pope". If all of the conjunctions are left in place, there is no possibility of ambiguity, and it is at least arguable that in legislative contexts this should be the rule. The result may appear a bit clumsy, but at least it is unambiguous. If an appositional phrase is required, then extra commas can be added to indicate the grouping: "Dedicated to my parents John and Jane, and Mother Teresa, and the Pope. If no ambiguity can result, all except the last conjunction can be elided and replaced by commas. "Dedicated to Tom and Dick and Harry" can thus be modified to "Dedicated to Tom, Dick and Harry". Of course the last conjunction cannot be elided because it would then produce an ambiguity as to which conjunction was in fact elided. "Dedicated to Tom, Dick, Harry" would not make it clear whether "and" or "or" had been elided, although in this particular example "or" would not make sense. However in a case like "This book must be published in English, French, Latin", elided "and"s would imply a different meaning from elided "or"s. In the normal case where commas replace elided conjunctions, there is no grammatical justification for inserting a comma before the last un-elided conjunction, because nothing has been elided there. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ~2026-11880-09 (talk) 07:58, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Serial comma article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed Article policies Neutral point of view No original research Verifiability

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives (index): 1, 2, 3, 4Auto-archiving period: 30 days

This article is written in British English with Oxford spelling (colour, realize, organization, analyse; note that -ize is used instead of -ise) and some terms may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

This  level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

University of Oxford Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject University of Oxford, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the University of Oxford on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.University of OxfordWikipedia:WikiProject University of OxfordTemplate:WikiProject University of OxfordUniversity of Oxford Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Linguistics Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article doesn't represent a worldwide view. Which other languages either prescribe or permit, and which prohibit, the use of the serial comma? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.192.197.247 (talk) 18:37, 10 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That's exactly what I came to this article to find out. Can speakers of languages other than English contribute their knowledge? Snugglepuss (talk) 20:44, 10 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There should be a discussion of the grammatical issues involved. If for instance you consider the first example, the presumably intended meaning is "Dedicated to my parents and Mother Teresa and the Pope". If all of the conjunctions are left in place, there is no possibility of ambiguity, and it is at least arguable that in legislative contexts this should be the rule. The result may appear a bit clumsy, but at least it is unambiguous.

If an appositional phrase is required, then extra commas can be added to indicate the grouping: "Dedicated to my parents John and Jane, and Mother Teresa, and the Pope.

If no ambiguity can result, all except the last conjunction can be elided and replaced by commas. "Dedicated to Tom and Dick and Harry" can thus be modified to "Dedicated to Tom, Dick and Harry". Of course the last conjunction cannot be elided because it would then produce an ambiguity as to which conjunction was in fact elided. "Dedicated to Tom, Dick, Harry" would not make it clear whether "and" or "or" had been elided, although in this particular example "or" would not make sense.

However in a case like "This book must be published in English, French, Latin", elided "and"s would imply a different meaning from elided "or"s.

In the normal case where commas replace elided conjunctions, there is no grammatical justification for inserting a comma before the last un-elided conjunction, because nothing has been elided there. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ~2026-11880-09 (talk) 07:58, 23 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]