Talk:Samson Option
This page is subject to the extended confirmed restriction related to the Arab-Israeli conflict.
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Samson Option article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| Archives (index): 1Auto-archiving period: 3 months |
| Discussions on this page have often led to previous arguments being restated. Please read recent comments before commenting. |
| This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
You are an administrator, so you may disregard the message below You are seeing this because of the limitations of {{If extended confirmed}} and {{If admin}}
You can hide this message box by adding the following to a new line of your common.css page: .ECR-edit-request-warning {
display: none;
}
Stop: You may only use this page to create an edit request This article is related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, which is subject to the extended-confirmed restriction. You are not an extended-confirmed user, so you must not edit or discuss this topic anywhere on Wikipedia except to make an edit request. (Additional details are in the message box just below this one.) |
Warning: active arbitration remedies The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article relates to the Arab–Israeli conflict.The following restrictions apply to everyone editing this article:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. |
References
[edit]</nowiki>}}
2405:6E00:630:DED2:795B:EC0A:CA11:F601 (talk) 08:10, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
References
Not done: The quotes in the last two references in the footnote, at least, do not explicitly support that "The militant's death is often compared to Samson's". Throast {{ping}} me! (talk | contribs) 14:27, 24 October 2025 (UTC)
- I have removed that part now. A better explanation of that would be too long for a footnote about the artwork, so I have simplified the footnote to focus on the artwork. 2405:6E00:630:DED2:795B:EC0A:CA11:F601 (talk) 07:53, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
Nuclear ambiguity
[edit]}}
2405:6E00:630:2539:B03B:7E56:4288:D846 (talk) 14:07, 22 October 2025 (UTC)
- Same range, multiple requests Whyiseverythingalreadyused (talk) 16:07, 22 October 2025 (UTC)
- Yes, this was a revised version of the request from 18 October 2025 that got rejected about 4 hours later. Previously I put the main messages of the article in my own words, the rejection said that was "somewhat vague" and "the portion you quoted does not support the claim", so here I used short quotes of the author's exact words. The rejection above also said "views should be attributed to its author" so I fixed that and linked the author's Wikipedia page instead of the newspaper. 2405:6E00:630:1BAB:F3F9:C96E:D7CC:BB93 (talk) 02:19, 2 November 2025 (UTC)
References
Not done: Cultural references to Samson do not seem relevant to the background of the deterrence strategy. In my view, the professor's opinion belongs in the "Authors' opinions" section rather than the "Background" section, if at all. Throast {{ping}} me! (talk | contribs) 14:36, 24 October 2025 (UTC)


