Talk:Ruling gradient

This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Trains: Operations High‑importance Trains Portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Associated projects or task forces: /  This article is supported by the Operations task force.

• Ardglen
  • 500 m (1,640 ft) estimate from Curve and Gradient book.
  • 487 m (1,599 ft) ^[1] Bayley
  • Bayley doesn't mention gradient

The whole missive on tunnels should be in a separate article.

The case with the Cascade Tunnel is less than hypothetical and ignores geographical reality. I believe the primary reason the original tunnel was replaced, was the winter avalanche problem on the west approach.

Baden K. 189.188.230.218 (talk) 23:30, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Ruling gradient. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20081208130955/http://extranet.artc.com.au:80/engineering_cd_diagrams.html to http://extranet.artc.com.au/engineering_cd_diagrams.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 20:05, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]