Talk:PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL was nominated as a Engineering and technology good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (April 12, 2020). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the PostgreSQL article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed Article policies Neutral point of view No original research Verifiability

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects.

Computing: Software / Free and open-source software Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Software (assessed as Mid-importance). This article is supported by Free and open-source software (assessed as High-importance). Databases (inactive) This article is within the scope of WikiProject Databases, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.DatabasesWikipedia:WikiProject DatabasesTemplate:WikiProject DatabasesDatabases

Revisions succeeding this version of this article is substantially duplicated in one or more external publications. Since these publication(s) copied Wikipedia, rather than the reverse, please do not flag this article as a copyright violation of the following source: Postegerous SQL, Engineer Master, 2015 Additional comments Verbatim copying. Engineer Master has been informed. Revision ID not accurate (dated to time of this template).

Archives

Archive 1 Archive 2

This page has archives. Topics inactive for 365 days are automatically archived 2 or more at a time by Lowercase sigmabot III if there are more than 2.

Copied from [1] WP:CRYSTAL doesn't apply to the near future (with a set date), at least (notable) movies. [It's a question if next future releases of PostgreSQL is notable..] I guess planned features can be cancelled (at any time?). In case they are in beta I would say including is ok. As the upcoming release (as all are) is open source it is released in some sense (and could be used, but not recommended for production, while testing is ok and recommended). Really all committed code is release (but not notable). Where should we draw the line (believe will end up in next release), beta, release candidate, alpha?.

I believe this is wrong even though the team celebrated its 12 year birthday that day. Initial release was in 1997. The article itself says this "The first PostgreSQL release formed version 6.0 on January 29, 1997". 213.131.36.174 (talk) 17:24, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The standards compliance section says 'PostgreSQL conforms to at least 170 of the 177 mandatory features for SQL:2023 Core conformance", and no other databases fully conformed to it'. However, Mimer SQL seems to support all core features, see https://download.mimer.com/pub/developer/standard/Core-SQL-Feature-Summary.pdf. Or do I misunderstand this? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nowthenlater (talk • contribs) 19:34, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]