Talk:Off topic

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Internet Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InternetWikipedia:WikiProject InternetTemplate:WikiProject InternetInternet Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ive updated the page a bit and will probably do so a bit more in the next few days. Added a bit more information regarding usage of the term "off topic," and some new external links.
--Wump 09:22, 13 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps you can add an Off Topic link to the opposit of On Topic :) Anker99 01:51, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

People don't write "on topic" posts, they write posts, which may be "off topic" or not. ie: on-topic is defined only as an opposite of off topic. Off topic posts are marked as OT, whilst On-topic posts are not marked. If there are no objections, I will convert it across in a week or so. --BP 10:41, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I could not quickly come up with any references for the paragraph I added about OT ban policies. Any experience list manager could could tell one this but a survey would need to be done (and probably has been) but I have not found it... The article should / does cover both on-topic and off topic. I did not even notice that my seach to off-topic was redirected to on-topic. Artcile naming policies may dictate... Fholson 16:26, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

Why is the title "Off topic" while the content text uses "off-topic" ? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.82.9.156 (talk) 06:47, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Shouldn't this page be called off-topic if every mention of the term uses the hyphen?--Adûnâi (talk) 01:32, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]