Talk:Multimodal interaction

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Computing: Software Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Software (assessed as Mid-importance). Artificial Intelligence This article is within the scope of WikiProject Artificial Intelligence, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Artificial intelligence on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Artificial IntelligenceWikipedia:WikiProject Artificial IntelligenceTemplate:WikiProject Artificial IntelligenceArtificial Intelligence ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

This article is being renamed to Multimodal Interaction to become the core article for a new sub-category of Human Computer Interaction. The term Multimodal Interaction is more inclusive than Multimodal Interfaces, and is the term adopted by several notable organizations including the W3C. Articles/catgeories under the new Multimodal category will include virtual, artificial and augmented reality. Thanks. -- Dx 20:19, 26 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

the following reference concerns HRI:

Integration and design of multi-modal interfaces for supervisory control systems

Authors: Zaatri A.; Oussalah M.

Source: Information Fusion, Volume 4, Number 2, June 2003 , pp. 135-150(16)

Publisher: Elsevier — Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.97.149.241 (talk) 23:35, 7 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It is probably a good idea to add some citations when using statements like "most common" or when asserting what makes a well-designed or poorly-designed MMI. VUIvangelist (talk) 23:12, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Is this still the case in the present version of the article? If not, then should {{more footnotes needed}} be finally removed from it? ACaseOfWednesdays (talk) 12:48, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The content of this article seems to be focused on exploring non-standard modalities (especially haptic & audio) for HCI, but it is not really talking about multimodal interaction -- what happens when multiple modalities are simultaneously present. Therefore, I think most of this article either belongs in Modality (human-computer interaction) or in the pages for the specific modalities, e.g. Auditory display or Haptic technology. Thoughts? Statisfactions (talk) 02:10, 31 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Actually re-reading the article, I think I'm wrong, that most of this is in fact focused on multi-modality. Never mind. Statisfactions (talk) 22:29, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

OK this one is odd.

I tagged this article as AI-generated because a lot of the text displays clear indicators of LLM output, potentially lacking thorough review. The text originates in this diff, but that diff is excerpting something somewhere else, and I don't know who added it. Nevertheless, regardless of where it came from it still needs the usual review for hallucinations, sourcing, tone, etc. Gnomingstuff (talk) 04:50, 24 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]