Talk:MultiCam

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Military history: Technology / North America / United States This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met Associated task forces: /  Military science, technology, and theory task force North American military history task force United States military history task force

Archives (Index)

1

This page is archived by ClueBot III.

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

• Camouflage Uniform of the Hungarian Army 2021.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 23:08, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Why is the M2017 listed as a multicam derivative? The pattern is different and the colors are different, so what is left? nothing of any resemblance. You could as well claim that UCP is a direct copy of M81 Woodland: it also has "only" a different pattern and different colors. That is ridiculous, sorry. I have to delete that block, as it is simply plain wrong. Even if the pattern was designed by Crye, it would still be different. It is not even the same family of camo patterns, if at all it resembles more the Swiss pattern (but I wouldn't dare to claim that it is a variant of that).--2003:E2:C724:500:345F:BC06:8B9E:5AE4 (talk) 03:41, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The design of M2017 is similar to multicam in that both use a similar color palette, as pointed out by the cited sources. [1] - "with colors that resemble the US Multicam" and [2] - "The Army pattern appears to utilise a similar palette to MultiCam"

So it can be considered a multicam variant. Alin2808 (talk) 19:54, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

• MultiCam.svg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 11:37, 17 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]