Talk:Learning Ally

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Dyslexia (inactive) This article is within the scope of WikiProject Dyslexia, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.DyslexiaWikipedia:WikiProject DyslexiaTemplate:WikiProject DyslexiaDyslexia Libraries Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Libraries, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Libraries on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LibrariesWikipedia:WikiProject LibrariesTemplate:WikiProject LibrariesLibraries Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Disability Learning Ally is within the scope of WikiProject Disability. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.DisabilityWikipedia:WikiProject DisabilityTemplate:WikiProject DisabilityDisability Organizations This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

I think the organization is reasonably notable. There's a version that doesn't look like self-promotion in the editing history a month or so back (before the edits of Audiobooklover). Perhaps we can roll back to that? --Alvestrand 13:11, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Done. PKirlin 19:45, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It was still (or again?) mostly a copy/paste from http://www.rfbd.org/about.htm. I've shortened and copyedited it, and added some additional detail about how their service is different from the mass consumer "books on tape" products. However, it's still a paraphrasing of the salient parts of their web page, which is better than a copy/paste but not as encyclopedic as I would like. Any suggestions for taking it to the next step? Petershank (talk) 22:42, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]