Talk:Identity driven networking

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Computer security: Computing Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer security, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computer security on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer securityWikipedia:WikiProject Computer securityTemplate:WikiProject Computer securityComputer security Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Computing (assessed as Low-importance). Things you can help WikiProject Computer security with: Article alerts are available, updated by AAlertBot. More information... Review importance and quality of existing articles Identify categories related to Computer Security Tag related articles Identify articles for creation (see also: Article requests) Identify articles for improvement Create the Project Navigation Box including lists of adopted articles, requested articles, reviewed articles, etc. Find editors who have shown interest in this subject and ask them to take a look here.

Topic added after MarkWahl's msg

This article seems to be more about "what could be" rather than "what is". Perhaps this topic is not ready yet for a Wikipedia article. MarkWahl (talk) 01:12, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I want to agree; my first instinct was to PROD it. But G gives results for this in mainstream venues. We're stuck with this silly marketing term, and now have to make sense of it here --- is my thought. --- tqbf 01:56, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This article is completely unsourced, and appears to be talking about a concept, a hypothetical suggestion of what could exist. While it is valid to talk about such things, how can we write an accurate encyclopedia article about it? This article has been edited 4 times in 2008, and none in 2009, and has content warning tags dating from December 2007 which have not been addressed at all.

Therefore, i will informally propose deletion of this article, unless we can find sources to verify. Any objections? If there are none, i will formally propose deletion soon. —fudoreaper (talk) 02:00, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]