Talk:Hethersett

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

East Anglia Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject East Anglia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of East Anglia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.East AngliaWikipedia:WikiProject East AngliaTemplate:WikiProject East AngliaEast Anglia Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Much of this article had been cut-and-pasted from the Hethersett website. I have removed the text in question. Shimeru 07:57, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hethersett. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090704125149/http://www.south-norfolk.gov.uk/democracy/Hethersett_parish.asp to http://www.south-norfolk.gov.uk/democracy/Hethersett_parish.asp
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.norfolk.gov.uk/consumption/groups/public/documents/general_resources/ncc017867.xls

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:34, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Is it nessarcary to have a detailed description of every single part of the church? Most of this appears to be copy and pasted. Skyeteam (talk) 14:47, 8 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Additionally, one church appears to have too much information, while two other places have barely one sentence, this appears to be bias. Skyeteam (talk) 14:51, 8 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]