Talk:Gate array
OK, I did the merge from ULA, but this article still needs some cleanup from someone familiar with the chips, who can also talk like regular people. :>) There is still a bit much jargon that is not quite comprehensible to someone outside of chip design and fab. Thanks!Lisamh 03:19, 20 September 2006 (UTC) Might be useful to cite and quote from New Scientist, for example https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=bvrsJuPd6SUC&pg=PA478 which introduces TI as a supplier, or the sample material from Chris Smith's book: http://www.zxdesign.info/book/bookAnnounce.shtml or Michael Debenham's book: https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=4LsgBQAAQBAJ&pg=PA51 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 51.6.217.39 (talk) 22:01, 18 May 2017 (UTC) I don't want to seem officious or anything, but upon reviewing this page, a lot of content was apparently added by Robert Lipp who is himself referenced to an extent in this article. I thought that this generally wasn't a done thing on Wikipedia. Also, a lot of the content doesn't really have the level of citing that seems to be required these days, and I think the article's structure might need some review as well. --PaulBoddie (talk) 00:01, 1 March 2022 (UTC) Hi, just browsing and saw your comment about my edits as a primary source. I always thought primary sources were preferred over secondary sources. You would prefer me to have quoted hearsay rather than facts? That’s what most references actually are. ~2026-22670-89 (talk) 20:24, 12 April 2026 (UTC) Robert Lipp ~2026-22670-89 (talk) 20:25, 12 April 2026 (UTC)
| This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
| |||||||||||
OK, I did the merge from ULA, but this article still needs some cleanup from someone familiar with the chips, who can also talk like regular people. :>) There is still a bit much jargon that is not quite comprehensible to someone outside of chip design and fab. Thanks!Lisamh 03:19, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
Might be useful to cite and quote from New Scientist, for example https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=bvrsJuPd6SUC&pg=PA478 which introduces TI as a supplier, or the sample material from Chris Smith's book: http://www.zxdesign.info/book/bookAnnounce.shtml or Michael Debenham's book: https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=4LsgBQAAQBAJ&pg=PA51 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 51.6.217.39 (talk) 22:01, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
I don't want to seem officious or anything, but upon reviewing this page, a lot of content was apparently added by Robert Lipp who is himself referenced to an extent in this article. I thought that this generally wasn't a done thing on Wikipedia. Also, a lot of the content doesn't really have the level of citing that seems to be required these days, and I think the article's structure might need some review as well. --PaulBoddie (talk) 00:01, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
- Hi, just browsing and saw your comment about my edits as a primary source. I always thought primary sources were preferred over secondary sources. You would prefer me to have quoted hearsay rather than facts? That’s what most references actually are. ~2026-22670-89 (talk) 20:24, 12 April 2026 (UTC)
- Robert Lipp ~2026-22670-89 (talk) 20:25, 12 April 2026 (UTC)