Talk:FAA Practical Test

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

United States: Government Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. Government (assessed as Low-importance). Aviation This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation This article has not yet been checked against the criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar and style: not checked Supporting materials: not checked To fill out this checklist, please add the following code to the template call: | b1<!--Referencing and citation--> = <yes/no> | b2<!--Coverage and accuracy   --> = <yes/no> | b3<!--Structure               --> = <yes/no> | b4<!--Grammar and style       --> = <yes/no> | b5<!--Supporting materials    --> = <yes/no> assessing the article against each criterion.

Is there a way sources can be added to this article? Freedom759 (talk) 17:55, 24 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Due to the Wikipedia article not following wikipedias notability guidelines I have suggested this page be deleted.

Any objections or reasons why this page should or should not be deleted will go under this page.

Freedom759 (talk) 23:31, 1 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello all,

I have noticed that the contents of the edition prior to my edit was leaning more toward pilot-only, while the term reflects the whole umbrella of airmen. I have tried to make it more universal. I know that there is more than "Designated Pilot Examiner".

I have also started rewording certain items so that they align with what the documents refer to (examiner vs evaluator... well because... an evaluator doesn't have to be an examiner in all cases; it can be an ASI or flight instructor)

This page will need a full revamp taking in formal wording and information taken from the FAA website. I hope I have helped things go in the right direction with my edit, not only for the content, so that it will look more like a wikipedia document than a middle school essay.

--Minfremi (talk) 04:25, 14 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]