Talk:Extended Project Qualification

This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Education This article is within the scope of WikiProject Education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of education and education-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EducationWikipedia:WikiProject EducationTemplate:WikiProject Educationeducation ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Extended Project Qualification. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111005050623/http://store.aqa.org.uk/over/pdf/AQA-9990-EPQ-W-SP.PDF to http://store.aqa.org.uk/over/pdf/AQA-9990-EPQ-W-SP.PDF

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:36, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I am replacing a dead link and rationalising the content in the introduction. I have found one source as a replacement citation but if not considered by others as sufficiently valid then it should be upgraded with an alternative citation.Vincentvangolf (talk) 01:41, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

In line with the template message that additional citations are required, a citation (John Catt Educational) has been added to support an unsubstantiated point at the end of the introduction. If a higher quality citation can be found then this one should be replaced Vincentvangolf (talk) 06:10, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The second paragraph of the Description section mentions restrictions which are unsubstantiated. The evidence from AQA^[1] suggests that there are fewer restrictions. Therefore if a citation cannot be found to support what is there then this needs replacing with evidence that can be supported.Vincentvangolf (talk) 08:18, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

In the absence of any support for the unsubstantiated assertion, the sentence has been edited and support added. Vincentvangolf (talk) 01:45, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]