Talk:Defibrillation

This  level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Physiology Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physiology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physiology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysiologyWikipedia:WikiProject PhysiologyTemplate:WikiProject PhysiologyPhysiology Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale. This article has not yet been associated with a particular area. Medicine: Emergency High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Emergency medicine and EMS task force (assessed as Top-importance).

Archives

Index 1

This page has archives. Topics inactive for 90 days are automatically archived by ClueBot III if there are more than 7.

Hello! I’ve reviewed the Lead, Medical Uses, Types, and Interface with Person sections of this article for the UCSF Wikipedia Elective. Overall, great work revising this article. Here are some suggestions:

Lead: great expansion of content and references in a simple, easy-to-follow manner

Medical uses: I like the revisions you made to the content and references about outcomes, but I think the first few sentences could be improved for readability

Types: Additional need for references in “manual external defibrillator” section, but good content revisions overall. Good simplification of “manual internal defibrillator” section. “AED” section is a little long. Especially because there is a link to an external article. I might consider cutting down this section, especially the 4th and 5th paragraphs. “Wearable cardiac defibrillator” references “as of February 2011”, which is quite a bit out of date now.

Interface with person: Would add references to this section. Could add a picture of self-adhesive electrodes. Could add a picture for the anterior-posterior scheme. Also should label the current image as anterior-apex scheme.

Hope this is helpful--let me know if you have any questions!

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Defibrillation. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.case.edu/artsci/dittrick/site2/museum/artifacts/group-c/c-8defrib.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060718182753/http://heartcenter.seattlechildrens.org/what_to_expect/pacemakers.asp to http://heartcenter.seattlechildrens.org/what_to_expect/pacemakers.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:21, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It notes "This changed in 1990 after Australian media mogul Kerry Packer had a heart attack and, purely by chance, the ambulance that responded to the call carried a defibrillator." But a defibrillator is used for Cardiac Arrest NOT Heart Attack. Did he have a Heart Attack which ledt to a Cardiac Arrest? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.158.59.137 (talk) 08:18, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

• Cabinet .jpg

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 13:38, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Experiments and research have since a long time established that energy is not a reliable parameter to determine the shock strength. It should be inserted in the article as it gives a better perspective on the relevant mechanisms. 84.58.249.189 (talk) 10:50, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please read IEC 60479-1 and 2. The stimulus amplitude increases with charge, not energy. 84.58.249.189 (talk) 09:58, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Valid point, but I am failing to see how the IEC standard works as a source for this article. (Part of that is because I am failing to see the full text, hah.) Maybe someone will find a more fitting and hopefully more accessible source. Artoria2e5 🌉 08:43, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is no mention of how a defibrillator generates the desired shock; that’s also a kind of "mechanism", but one that’s understood by humans. There seems to be at least two main "waveforms" that manufacturers aim to provide, the older monophasic and the newer biphasic.

I’m not sure whether the engineering aspect of a medical device requires a medical source. Well, the part that compares the therapeutic efficacy of different waveforms definitely will require one, if I get to writing it… eventually. Artoria2e5 🌉 06:51, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hana Akselrod, Mark W. Kroll, and Michael V. Orlov, History of Defibrillation, Chapter 2 in: Efimov, Kroll, Tchou, Cardiac Bioelectric Therapy, pp 15-40. 2A02:1210:2642:4A00:2D1B:961B:EA86:D96C (talk) 22:10, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]