Talk:Declassification

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Politics Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Freedom of speech Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Freedom of speech, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Freedom of speech on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Freedom of speechWikipedia:WikiProject Freedom of speechTemplate:WikiProject Freedom of speechFreedom of speech Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

It would be interesting to know WHY documents that are classified are later declassified, that is, the reason behind this. For example, why shouldn't they just remain classified?--200.14.108.1 19:00, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The passage of time or events, the lessening of perceived harm if disclosed, and correcting overclassification are the primary reasons for declassifying or downgrading security classifications. For example, ship movements before they sail may be classified information, but once they have finished their mission may no longer be of value. Another example, may be the content of a policy speech is protectible before the speech is given. In order to prevent confusion of what is current policy is before the speech is given, but once the speech is given there is no need to prevent dissimination because there is no longer a possibility of confusion during the transition period. Current war plans typically are classified, but due to the passage of time world war II war plans may no longer qualified. —Preceding unsigned comment added by FOIAngel (talk • contribs) 16:29, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This article only concerns the USA. It would be good to have informtation about other countries. Dpmuk 00:19, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I saw a former intelligence official on television describing one of his superiors (DCI or maybe POTUS) as having "committed an act of declassification", which is apparently the intelligence community jargon for a high-level official publicly announcing something heretofore classified without going through the normal procedures (but not unlawfully, the official having legal authority to declassify). It would be nice to document this. 121a0012 (talk) 04:02, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The article refers to 9 reasons to avoid declassification at 25 years, but doesn't state what they are. Further, that information is quite difficult to find online elsewhere. Should these be included?

They are: (1) reveal the identity of a confidential human source, or a human intelligence source, or reveal information about the application of an intelligence source or method;

(2) reveal information that would assist in the development or use of weapons of mass destruction;

(3) reveal information that would impair U.S. cryptologic systems or activities;

(4) reveal information that would impair the application of state of the art technology within a U.S. weapon system;

(5) reveal actual U.S. military war plans that remain in effect;

(6) reveal information, including foreign government information, that would seriously and demonstrably impair relations between the United States and a foreign government, or seriously and demonstrably undermine ongoing diplomatic activities of the United States;

(7) reveal information that would clearly and demonstrably impair the current ability of United States Government officials to protect the President, Vice President, and other protectees for whom protection services, in the interest of the national security, are authorized;

(8) reveal information that would seriously and demonstrably impair current national security emergency preparedness plans or reveal current vulnerabilities of systems, installations, infrastructures, or projects relating to the national security; or

(9) violate a statute, treaty, or international agreement. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.60.213.253 (talk) 00:15, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please see this discussion thread for important information relevant to edits to this article. Thanks! Dominic·t 20:56, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]