Talk:Chain tool

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Chain tool article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed Article policies Neutral point of view No original research Verifiability

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This page was proposed for deletion by an editor in the past.

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Cycling This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cycling, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cycling on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CyclingWikipedia:WikiProject CyclingTemplate:WikiProject Cyclingcycling ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

I don't believe the distinction between bikes with chains with master links and bikes with chains without is correct. There are plenty of single-speed bikes without master links, and there are plenty of many-geared bikes (21-30) with master links. SRAM makes chains suitable for 8 and 9 speed rear ends that include their 'Power Link'. KMC makes a 'Missing Link' that works well with Shimano 10-speed chains. Any objections to me making a correction? AndrewDressel 13:52, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, liked this article. One helpful thing would to make clear in the text that there are two cradles in the tool. One (furthest from the piston) is for removing or inserting pins. This has the additional effect of tightening the pins and can make a `stiff~link'. A `stiff~link' can cause problems and chain breakages.

The second cradle (nearest the piston) is for loosening the chain links. This can fix a `stiff~link'. Robin48gx (talk) 12:09, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

the text is too verbose and uses too many undefined technical terms for a general reference, could someone please re-write the usage of this tool in a more straight-forward and general manner, perhaps with diagrams (or at least link to definitions of the terms used, like "roller" for instance). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.229.85.62 (talk) 12:53, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you're someone who just bought their first chain tool, I highly recommend procuring an old crappy chain (I bet your Local Bike Store will have one sitting around) and messing around with it so you can get a feel for what you can and can't do, how to not push the rivet all the way out of the link plate, etc., etc. That way, when you inevitably mess up your first few times, you won't be messing up your brand-new $20 chain. Plus, it's fun. :D Druiffic (talk) 08:36, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Agree. play with an old chain first and get used to making stiff links and then loosening them in the other cradle. Robin48gx (talk) 12:10, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Chain tool/CommentsTalk:Chain tool/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

I have assessed this article as Stub-class and identified the following areas for improvement: The article needs cleaning up The article needs references The article would benefit from copyediting The article reads as a how-to guide, it would benefit if it just presented the facts SeveroTC 10:34, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 10:34, 26 June 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 19:51, 1 May 2016 (UTC)